Subscribe
Notify of

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It was fabulous. It was abundantly clear all these idiots were trying to accomplish was to pad their resume’s with some sound bites and get the opportunity to voice more false, baseless accusations against Trump. Instead of considering Lewandowski in contempt of Congress, these lying Democrat full colostomy-bags should be found in contempt of the Constitution.

Lewandowski wisely refused to answer any questions which he did not have documentation on or full recollection of. He is fully aware what the Democrats were up to, trying to ask vague and insignificant questions to which THEY have the documented answers to, trying to get Lewandowski to make some mistake which he can be prosecuted for… a standard they do not and WILL not hold themselves to.

Typically, Nadler decides no rules exist and HE can make and change rules as he goes along and as it suits the Democrat agenda.

Johnson confirms what everyone already believes; that he is a complete idiot.

Jackson-Lee also proves, once again, what a liar and IDIOT she is. More of a USELESS idiot.

Its way past time the Democrats were put in their place for far too long have been allowed to get away with everything its time for them to face the music the piper is wanting his fair share of the cash

Something far more insidious happened at this hearing.

Remember back in 2013 when IRS head Lois Lerner “took the 5th?”
Here’s how the NYMag looked at it then:

It’s worth pointing out that innocent people, as well as guilty people, can have perfectly justifiable reasons to plead the Fifth.

The Supreme Court affirmed this in Ohio v. Reiner.
…..
The thing to understand is that “self-incrimination” is not tantamount to “admitting guilt.” …. As the Court pointed out, “one of the Fifth Amendment’s ‘basic functions … is to protect innocent men … ‘who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances.’”

Compare and contrast that to how the 5th Amendment was twisted during the Lewandosky hearing.
Either a Dem, Nadler or his staff questioner, told Lewandowsky that only guilty people took the 5th!
Now, I’d heard a Dem say this in a different hearing once before.
But it is so far off the truth that it’s scary that anyone in gov’t thinks this way.
Trump invoked the 5th 97 times just during ONE divorce procedure.
His quote about only the guilty take the 5th is NOT legal precedent.
It is more like hyperbola.
That’s not hyperbola when it’s Nadler or one of the Dems or one of the questioners on their payroll in this Lewandowsky hearing.

A conservative, an honest, real conservative, testifies! Long overdue! Far too many liberal “Republicans” testifying in both Houses the last several years!

GOOD!