Ace:
A Picasso sold for big money at auction and so it’s kind of news. $174 million big.
The leftist media has been attributing this act of (minor) censorship to “Fox News,” despite the fact that “Fox 5” appears right in the bottom corner of their pictures — that is, it’s a local affiliate.
Here’s the New Yorker’s art critic:
How sexually sick are conservatives & Fox News? They blurred parts of the Picasso painting. #SickMinds pic.twitter.com/5PGw5h5iBs
— Jerry Saltz (@jerrysaltz) May 13, 2015
He just ignores the “Fox 5” in order to spread The Narrative.
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/598944373926207488
But certainly FoxNews would censor it, if it covered this story, right?
Wrong. Fox News proper did cover it– uncensored. Boobies intact.
.@lachlan Here's how Fox News Channel aired it Tuesday, for instance. pic.twitter.com/xWPPN8YV1L
— Vince Coglianese (@VinceCoglianese) May 14, 2015
Mother Jones then gets super-funny by showing other paintings with thedirty parts blurred out.
While these hens hector Fox News about censorship that didn’t happen — one searches in vain for the Charlie Hebdo cartoons on the New Yorker, or Mother Jones.
Almost the entirety of the “mainstream” — actually, leftwing media– either embargoed the Charlie cartoons completely, or cropped/censored them so that none of the Forbidden Art would offend their readers.