When The Washington Post broke the story that Christine Blasey Ford was the person who accused Supreme Court nominee of assault dating back to high school, there were a several aspects of the WaPo story that struck me as particularly strange.
First, there was a suggestion that this is a repressed and recovered memory case:
“Years later, after going through psychotherapy, Ford said, she came to understand the incident as a trauma with lasting impact on her life.”
If this is a case of repressed memory, then it changes everything. It’s a convenient explanation for why Ford said nothing to anyone for 30 years despite herself being a clinical psychologist. Repressed and recovered memory, however, is of questionable veracity and admissibility in court.
Second, that repressed memory allegedly was recovered in 2012 during couples’ therapy, Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband.
Why in couples therapy, not in individual therapy? That seems like an odd time to recover memory, particularly for a clinical psychologist who likely underwent or practiced various forms of psychological therapy during her long career. This suggests that perhaps there was some marital problem which implicated an earlier trauma, if this story is true, or invented an earlier trauma as an excuse, if the story is not true.
Third, Ford volunteered the therapists notes to WaPo, but only selective portions chosen by Ford:
The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.
It seems odd for an alleged sexual assault victim to volunteer psychiatric records, particularly since the odious “nuts and sluts” defense so frequently is used against accusers. And why were only selective portions shared?
My gut tells me the therapy records hold a key to what did or did not happen here. Having voluntarily shared a part of those records with a newspaper, it’s hard for Ford to argue confidentiality.
Via NYTimes:
She’s not prepared to talk with them at a hearing on Monday,” Ms. Banks [ one of Ford’s lawyers] said. Even if Republicans agreed to an F.B.I. investigation, it would take time to complete, she added. “No legitimate investigation is going to happen between now and Monday.”
But Republicans drew a hard line. “If she does not come on Monday, we are going to move on and vote on Wednesday,” Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and a member of the committee, told Fox News on Tuesday evening.
http://archive.is/AnvRX#selection-329.1-333.232
Trump is trying to govern and Democrats are doing nothing but playing delaying games. I would hazard a guess that NO Democrats in government believes there is a shred of validity in Ford’s claims as they apply to Kavanagh.
I hope the reality of the true character of these Democrats and the tendencies Democrats show should they have more power is not lost upon the voters of November.
Talk about bending over backwards!
Sen Grassley is going to charter a jet to take whichever Sens & Judge Brett K to Mrs Ford’s so she can be interviewed in the comfort of close-to-home!
She’ll only have a few days to decide if she’ll go for this or turn it down, too.
But the FBI is saying they have nothing to investigate.
There’s no date, no place, no witnesses, even she is refusing to see them!
So, nothing.
And the statute of limitations has long passed.
And it never was a FEDERAL crime.
And, whether it was a crime at all is even questionable.
Bets on if she answers Sens questions before they vote on Judge K?
Whenever I have to have any of my medical records to give to another physician, my primary care physician sends them. I do NOT get copies of my medical records. The accuser would have the right to see her psychotherapist’s notes, if she asked to see them, but it seems to me a therapist would be violating HIPA laws by giving the patient hard copy medical files.
It would be interesting to know how the Washington Compost learned the accuser’s name to be able to contact her. Who leaked her name? DiFi?