Kamala Stopped FBI From Monitoring Black Supremacists Like Waukesha Killer

Spread the love

Loading

by Daniel Greenfield

Two years ago, Senator Kamala Harris, along with Senator Cory Booker and six other Democrat Senate members, attacked the Justice Department for monitoring black supremacists. The politicians signed a letter falsely claiming that black identity extremists was “a fabricated term based on a faulty assessment of a small number of isolated incidents”.
 
And they argued that monitoring black racists was racist.
 
When Kamala Harris was running for president, the privileged daughter of wealthy foreign students falsely claimed that she faced segregation in Berkeley, California.
 
“That little girl was me,” she famously declared.
 

 
In Waukesha, Jackson Sparks, an 8-year-old boy, was killed by the black supremacist terrorist whom Kamala Harris had protected.
 
That little boy’s blood is on her hands.
 
Kamala had joined a crusade by Senator Cory Booker to pressure the FBI to eliminate the black identity extremists category and stop tracking terror attacks by black supremacists.
 
Later that same year, two devotees of the Black Hebrew Israelite hate group, a racist and antisemitic cult, opened fire at a Kosher market in Jersey City. The black supremacist terror attack killed the store owner, an employee, and a customer.
 
[the_ad id=”155722″]
 
An unexploded bomb in their van could have killed people a distance of five football fields away.
 
Even though the terrorist attack happened in Senator Booker’s state, he refused to acknowledge that the black supremacist hate he had protected was responsible.
 
Booker had previously berated FBI Director Christopher Wray for monitoring black racists.
 
“That language you said, both ends of the spectrum, the murders at synagogues, the murders we’ve seen motivated,” he ranted. “You said both ends of the spectrum, as if there actually is a movement of black identity extremism: it’s almost creating this reality.”
 
Another Black Hebrew Israelite terrorist attacker went on to attack a Monsey synagogue during Chanukah, slashing worshipers with a machete, wounding 4 and killing one.
 
A 72-year-old Chassidic Jew who had been born in Hungary after the Holocaust tried to fight him off with his cane. The black supremacist killer smashed in his skull with a machete.
 
A Green Party candidate and “respected civil rights attorney” fought for the racist killer who got off, despite having googled “Why did Hitler hate the Jews” and “New York City Increases Police Presence in Jewish Neighborhoods After Possible Anti-Semitic Attacks. Here’s What To Know.”
 
The Black Hebrew Israelite cult’s “Why did Hitler hate the Jews” meme reappeared again in the internet history of another black supremacist killer.
 
Darrell Brooks, who drove his car into the Waukesha Christmas Parade, killing 6 people, including an 8-year-old boy, had previously posted a variation of the same Black Hebrew Israelite meme claiming that Hitler was killing Jews to support the black supremacists.
 
   
 
While Kamala and Booker intimidated the Justice Department and law enforcement officials, the media had celebrated the vile racists. The New York Times described the Black Hebrew Israelites as “sidewalk ministers” who practice “tough love” while dismissing their racist rants as “blunt and sometimes offensive language.”
 
Typical of this “tough love” and “blunt” language was declaring, “The Holocaust is a damn joke! Heil Hitler!” and  “The messiah, who is a black man, is going to kill you”.
 
The media’s laborious whitewashing of the Black Hebrew Israelite hate cult began when it falsely accused Covington Catholic students in D.C. for a pro-life rally of racism when they were assailed by racial slurs from members of the BHI hate group. The Washington Post, which would end up settling a lawsuit over its false reporting, claimed that, “Israelite street preaching in parts of D.C., Philadelphia and New York is commonplace, a familiar if odd accent to city life.”
 
According to the Bezos paper, “Heil Hitler” adds a ”familiar if odd accent to city life”.
 
Rep. Ilhan Omar, who could never resist antisemites and racists, falsely claimed that the slandered students were “taunting 5 Black men”.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

When did the FBI become led by a bunch of pussies that are afraid of a couple of race-baiting crybabies and fails to do its job tracking violent terrorists? The same thing happened under Obama; they were “forced” to delete references to Muslims and Islamic extremists in their investigations, which pretty much ends useful investigation and prevention of terrorism.

At the same time, they invent the threat of “white supremacists” committing violent acts of terror across the nation and search, in vain, for evidence of any such threat.

Clearly, beyond doubt, the FBI has been reduced to a political organization that commits investigations for strictly political reasons, trying to eliminate political opposition from Democrats and protect those who are willing to commit terroristic political violence for the left.

Milwaukee DA office has zero record of the court proceedings where the SUV terrorist tried to murder his baby momma by running her over and was not only given back the dangerous weapon but given a 1000 dollar bond for attempted murder. There is a federal law about keeping TRANSCRIPTS what do they think this is an election? Technical difficulties, my Aunt Edna’s hairy butt, this is a cover up. Wassa madder Chilsolm are there worse cases with lower bails, where is the line drawn where technical difficulties may or may not occur?

As far as I can tell, the only place/time the FBI actually investigates crimes it does not instigate is on television.

Like on TV, the majority of what they are “investigating” never happened.

Hey is’nt it Federal Crime to aid and abet a crinimals in the commission of a Crime

JUST IN: Senior Advisor and Chief Spokesperson to Kamala Harris Resigns
comment image
Symone Sanders

Another high profile official is exiting Kamala Harris’s office.

Symone Sanders, a senior advisor and chief spokesperson to Kamala Harris, is leaving the White House at the end of the month.

Politico reported:

Symone Sanders, the senior adviser and chief spokesperson for Vice President Kamala Harris, is expected to leave the White House at the end of the year, according to five administration officials familiar with the matter.

It was not immediately clear where Sanders is heading next or when she will be leaving the vice president’s office. Sanders is the highest profile exit and the second high-profile one from the Harris team in the last month. Ashley Etienne, Harris’ communications director, is also set to depart in the coming weeks.

An official in the vice president’s office confirmed the departure and said the president and vice president have “known for a while.” The official added that Sanders had worked for President Joe Biden for nearly three years.

It was recently reported Kamala Harris’ Communications Director Ashley Etienne is leaving the administration in December to pursue “other opportunities.”

Interesting to say the least. It is not lower level staff leaving, these are high level key advisor positions. It has also been known now for several months, the biden regime has been looking for a way to “offload” harris. harris routinely polls significantly below biden. Efforts to cast her in a different more appealling manor have fallen short. Inside sources say the biden regime has not excluded any possiblities to rid themselves of harris.

More FBI malfeasance…

How the FBI Downplays Leftist Terror Activity

The investigation into the 2019 Dayton, Ohio mass shooting shows the Bureau cannot be trusted to identify left-wing violence.

Pro-Antifa social media accounts are taking a victory lap this week following the announcement that the FBI has ruled out a political motive in the 2019 Dayton, Ohio mass murder of nine people, carried out by Antifa supporter Connor Betts. One of the victims was Betts’ sister.

Betts interacted with multiple Antifa-aligned accounts online, including the Socialist Rifle Association (SRA), a Marxist group whose members commonly provide armed support during Antifa actions. Betts himself attended Antifa protests while armed, and made statements calling for killing “every fascist” and urged his comrades to “arm, train, prepare” to oust Trump from office, according evidence unearthed by Andy Ngo, a journalist with a long history of covering Antifa violence. Betts can also be seen in images wearing Satanist and anarchist patches. Betts, dressed all in black and wearing a mask, opened fire on a crowd outside the “traditional western-themed bar” Ned Peppers, before being killed by police.

The FBI appears to have taken none of these known facts into account when it determined:

The evidence from the extensive investigation indicated the perpetrator, Connor Betts, was solely responsible for the injuries and deaths that were a result of his actions. He acted alone and was not directed by any organization or aligned to any specific ideological group./blockquote>

The FBI instead emphasizes Betts’ apparent fascination with mass shootings of all types, even non-ideological ones, and highlights mental health issues, including obsessive compulsive disorder. It has nothing to say about the death of Betts’ sister either, or whether Betts was aware of his sister’s presence in the crowd.

It may be reasonable to say that Betts was not directed by any organization, though this is scarcely necessary for politically motivated terrorism in the 21st century. As has been the case, for example, among Islamic State terrorists, individuals often conduct attacks they know will win the accolades of members of groups with whom they are aligned, even though they may not have received direct orders.

Betts for example publicly uttered his approval of the attack conducted by armed Antifa member Willem van Spronsen, targeting a Tacoma-area Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility, only one month before Betts’ own shooting spree, calling Spronsen “a martyr.” It is worth asking whether Betts may reasonably have believed his own attack would be regarded in a similar manner by people he interacted with online.

It is also not clear if the FBI developed an extensive understanding of Betts’ nonpublic contacts, as it had struggled to acquire access to one of Betts’ many cell phones. Antifa is known to be heavily security-conscious and to use encrypted communications and “burner” phones.

Regardless, evidence that Betts aligned himself with ideological “anti-fascists” is uncontrivable and easily available. Unfortunately, the willingness of the FBI to blatantly ignore publicly available information about a perpetrator’s political motivations is equally well known. The FBI outraged congressional Republicans when it failed to identify progressive activist James Hodgkinson, who opened fire on Republican lawmakers during a practice for the congressional baseball game in 2017, as politically motivated, instead labelling his attack as a “suicide by cop.”

Like Betts, Hodgkinson had a substantial social media trail of political posts which the FBI deliberately ignored, in addition to a list of Republican congressmen on his person prior to the attack.

Law enforcement has also recently come under fire for ignoring the political motivations of Waukesha parade attacker Darrell Brooks, Jr., whose social media was replete with pro-Black Lives Matter and black identity extremism content.

It is reasonable for the FBI to consider whether Betts’ mental health, use of illegal drugs, and other factors may have impacted his decision to conduct his murderous assault. What is not reasonable is the FBI’s insistence on ruling out, despite clear evidence, that Betts had an ideological affiliation with a known violent ideological movement, that he corresponded with groups from that movement on social media prior to the attack, and that Betts praised an armed attack by an individual affiliated with one such group only one month prior to his own murderous attack.

Unfortunately, the FBI continues to make clear that its assessments cannot be considered reliable when it comes to potential terrorist violence from perpetrators whose politics are deemed “left-wing.” This puts the FBI substantially out of step with other Western law enforcement and intelligence agencies, which do actively analyze the threat of left-wing terrorism.

The FBI has repeatedly downplayed the threat of “left-wing” violence in support of a politicalized narrative which recognizes only white-supremacist groups or America’s “right-wing” as a potential threat. Indeed, under the Biden Administration’s domestic terrorism strategy, mere adherence to beliefs ranging from objections to COVID vaccine mandates, to election integrity concerns, to opposition to critical race theory in public schools have all been identified as hallmarks of violent extremism, even when there is no evidence of membership in supposedly extremist organizations.

This being the case, local and state law enforcement should no longer be deferential to FBI rulings on the political motivations of perpetrators in cases which may have a nexus to terrorism. While the FBI has lead jurisdictions on terrorism cases in the United States, their refusal to assert a terrorism nexus should not dissuade local or state law enforcement from conducting their own investigations, and bringing state terrorism charges, where such legislation exists.

How the FBI Downplays Leftist Terror Activity