Investigation into Clinton lawyers accused of deleting emails is ordered

Spread the love

Loading

Fox News:

A Maryland county judge has ordered the state bar to investigate three lawyers accused of deleting thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Circuit Judge Paul F. Harris Jr. ruled Monday that the Attorney Grievance Commission and Office of Bar Counsel Maryland Office of Bar Counsel must look into complaints against Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson and David E. Kendall, citing “allegations of destroying evidence,” according to the Washington Times.

The ruling came after Ty Clevenger, an attorney in New York City, filed the complaint. He recently was denied files from the FBI related to Clinton’s email investigation, due to what the bureau called a lack of public interest.
Clevenger argued that the lawyers should be investigated for wrongdoing by destroying evidence, The Baltimore Sun reported.

Harris said Clevenger’s appeal to have the lawyers investigated “appears to have merit,” the Times reported.

Clevenger is looking to prove Clinton committed perjury, the Times reported. He said he was writing a book about political corruption — and has lobbed accusations against both Republicans and Democrats.

A lawyer for the bar counsel said Monday that Clevenger’s complaint was “frivolous” but wouldn’t elaborate, citing confidentiality reasons. Judge Harris rejected the argument.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The judge needs to real’y throw the book at them all

We can have no idea how much damage Hillary’s decision to use a private, secret, unsecured server did to our national security. Hillary had her staff destroy 33,000 emails after the existence of this server became known. Does anyone REALLY believe these were personal emails which needed to be totally, completely, irretrievably wiped from the face of the earth?

As it stands right now, this activity is approved. Despite the rules, regulations and laws against it, the past administration established a precedent that conducting State Department (or any other) government business… the PEOPLE’S business… in cloaked, dark secrecy from government oversight, while frowned upon, will not be punished.

So, I ask any of the whiny, crybaby, sore loser liberals out there, is it OK if the Trump administration conducts business the same way? Someone answer, please (no, I am not expecting AJ to respond… FAR too dangerous for him).

There are just some who dont have to follow the law, just a fact. Where those around Trump get early morning raids where they sweep in and go through the underwear drawers, Clintons people get immunity and she gets have their lawyers decide what is evidence.