by Joanne Codling
The “hottest day” is not that hot, and very irrelevant
So the news cycle went hyperbolic over a single dubious hot day in records that only go back 0.01% of human existence. Remember when “30 year trends” were all that mattered?
Let’s ignore for the moment that the error bars on measurements of global temperature in 1899 would make any normal scientist blush. Who believes for one minute even today we can measure the global surface temperature to one hundredth of a degree? The cringeworthy insignificant digits were everywhere. On Monday the Earths surface was supposedly 17.01 degrees Celsius for the first time in “human history”. Then Tuesday it was 17.18C, Hallelujah. Who are we kidding?
Probably the biggest lie was to call this “human history” as if the ancient Egyptians were measuring the temperature on Earth and every day of the week. Are we really sure we know what the temperature was on July 3, 2201 BC? Maybe it was 17.31C that day — prove me wrong? We have no idea how hot the “hottest days” were for 99% of human civilization. The best proxies we have can’t tell us what the temperature was for 24 hour periods. We can’t compare 20 year smoothed averages with a single 24 hour snapshot. Well, scientific prostitutes can, but not real scientists.
If it was a record “hottest day”, it might have been the hottest day in the last 40 years (maybe, and if only we had good thermometers, didn’t put them at airports, near air conditioners and incinerators, didn’t go electronic, hide the calibration data, and adjustify the records, eh?). It’s a big so-what.
And in the end we know it there have been hotter years before in human civilization, and probably thousands of them.
Who is trying to erase the Holocene?
Don’t they teach climate scientists anything anymore? Karsten Haustein, from the University of Leipzig was telling the BBC that July will possibly be the hottest “since the Eemian”, 120,000 years ago, as if the Holocene optimum period didn’t exist.
A mere 5,000 years ago sea levels were higher, corals were happy, people thrived, and Greenland was a lot warmer. This was a global phenomenon — higher sea levels and some 6,000 boreholes drilled around the world show the same pattern.
It was hotter for thousands of years and CO2 was irrelevant. What the world needs are some real science journalists who can ask these badly trained junior modelers what happened to the Holocene?
This graph shows the ice-core data up until 1855. The last 150 years (1705 to 1855) are highlighted in red to show the warming as the Earth began coming out of the Little Ice Age.
Sea levels were higher all around the world
How could the oceans be higher all around the world if the world was not warmer? Sea levels have been falling for the last 7,000 years around Australia, they used to be nearly 1m higher in the South China Sea, South Africa and Polynesia and it’s a similar pattern around the world (thanks NoTricksZone). Studies on mangroves in Brazil show sea levels were about 2.7 meters higher in the mid-Holocene, and mangroves grew 34 kilometers further inland. (Fontes et al 2017). CO2 Science lists references all over the world. I am barely skimming the surface.
Other researchers estimate the waters flowing out of the Pacific Ocean past Indonesia were a full 2 degrees Celcius warmer 7,000 years ago. (Rosenthal, (2013). Somehow corals did not go extinct, ancient viruses didn’t wipe out the Sumerians, and humans spread across the Earth.
How Do We Know Climate Change Is Real? – There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause.
While Earth’s climate has changed throughout its history, the current warming is happening at a rate not seen in the past 10,000 years.According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), “Since systematic scientific assessments began in the 1970s, the influence of human activity on the warming of the climate system has evolved from theory to established fact.”1Scientific information taken from natural sources (such as ice cores, rocks, and tree rings) and from modern equipment (like satellites and instruments) all show the signs of a changing climate.From global temperature rise to melting ice sheets, the evidence of a warming planet abounds.Read the article. It you’re stupid, don’t bother. Facts can’t cure stupidity.
You believed a lie idiot
I guess if we wore masks it would get cooler.
Back in the 1970’s it was Global Cooling and New Ice Age there’s a episode of INSEARCH OF from 1978 about the hard winter that hit Buffalo New York in the winter of 76/77 and Time and Newsweek was giving it Top Coverage in their leftists rags back then
You should read up on the IPCC. Try the book The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World’s Top Climate Expert by Donna Lafromboise. It’s an eye opener.
Unless you’re stupid, don’t bother. Facts can’t cure stupidity.
So why do all the climate change predictions fail? How am I supposed to buy into what you are selling when your side can’t get one not one prediction right?
https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/50-years-of-failed-doomsday-eco-pocalyptic-predictions-the-so-called-experts-are-0-50/
Perry has cherry-picked decades of sensationalist articles and outlier predictions to discredit the current conclusions of observational, fact-based science. Global warming, desertification, mass species extinction, groundwater depletion, and environmental contamination with persistent non-biodegradable bio-active chemicals are all observable fact.
“Sides” has to do with controlling belief and opinion, not revealing truth.
Idiocy has arrived.
Should a trumpet be blown to announce your entrance?
You mean the very predictions you climate zealots use to try and secure control of the economy and all aspects of life for your own purposes? THOSE predictions?
Again, how about the predictions that came to pass?
Your “side” tries to fear-monger people into giving up their freedom to assuage a threat that is not there. You are liars and have absolutely not one shred of credibility.
I mean precisely what I said: Perry has cherry-picked decades of sensationalist articles and outlier predictions to discredit the current conclusions of observational, fact-based science. He’s doing that because the reality of all of the negative developments and trends I mentioned is indisputable. All of these negative consequences are real, and getting worse.
And I mean what I said: those are the same bullshit lies you use to try and get people to surrender their lives to socialist thieves. Your fear porn never comes to pass and people are figuring that out, finally.
Do you want to talk about geo-engineering yet?
Biden is getting on board with Bill Gates to dim the sun, how does that work for renewable solar?
They bought the science you tout so highly, grant money flows to those that lie for the agenda.
All that money could have been used to clean up pollution. CO2 is a natural part of our atmosphere not a pollutant. Biology will tell you it is plant food, greenhouses have CO2 generators to increase plant growth, plants are natural CO2 lock up systems, you dont need to pump it underground like some maniac.
The predictions did not come to pass because they were fear mongering lies.
Cherry picked? How many failed predictions do you need? I’ve got plenty more. You go off on some screed that of course you attribute to man caused. Where’s your proof these kind of thing don’t happen naturally? They always have. Oh and you forgot rain bombs and cow farts. Those are all the rage in the climate change community. Any weather event is now proof of climate change. It’s really getting old and tiring.
Lets go back in time briefly. Remember Hurricane Katrina? We were told this was a sure sign of climate change. We were now going to see more storms, more severe from now on. Then what did we get? Over the next decade or so we saw fewer major storms and less frequent. Another failed prediction and yet the climate change bandwagon just moved on waiting for the next weather event to arrive.
Today’s climate change predictions are tomorrows climate change failures.
Here’s some more for you.
Remember climategate? The leading climate scientists faking data? Oh how the media hated this getting out.
…
You’re in a cult.
It’s pointless arguing with people gullible enough to believe a billionaire needs their lunch money to save them from his critics.
F-off idiot
More fear mongering from the greedy, corrupt, leftist wealth-transferers. It’s all about grabbing as much money as is possible before the facts about the massive fraud of “global warming” is fully exposed (and it is already mostly exposed).
Hollywood Celebrity Robert Redford claims Fossil Fuels are Cooking the Earth while he has also done ads for United Airlines(Its Time to Fly)opposed drilling and opposes anyone Building Homes too close to his Estate while selling land to developers He like the rest of the Modern Day Hollywood crowd live in homes that still use all those Kilowatt Hours of electricity and all that water in one month far more then the average American Family dose in one year
According to the Crack-Pots 2014 was the Horres year its also when they held The Useful Idiots(Peoples)Climate March through New York City and left behind a Mountain of Trash while marching through the Streets over a totally fake threat of Global Warming/Climate Change