By Jo Nova
The Experts thought Greenland’s ice has been there for the whole Pleistoscene era, or the last 2.6 million years. It was just another useless consensus, stultifying science — feeding the myth that the climate was perfect until Big Coal screwed it up.
Map adapted from Westoff et al 2022
Finally, 30 years after the famous GISP ice core was hauled out of the Greenland summit, someone has bothered to study the dirt at the bottom and found poppy seeds, willow twigs and insects there, where they were not supposed to be. They discovered a vibrant tundra ecosystem where there was supposed to be an ice-cap. The obvious conclusion is that cavemen didn’t cause it, and that there must be some huge other natural forces at work that we have no clue about. Our climate models didn’t predict this, because CO2 was low then and clearly, the models are hopelessly incomplete. We are babes in the wood on the third rock from the sun.
The captive science PR writers don’t tell us that CO2 might be irrelevant compared to the big mystery forces we don’t understand. Instead they tell us that this means that the Greenland icesheet is more fragile than we realized and could melt again (send us your money!)
No matter what we discover it’s always worse than we thought:
Fossils From The Heart of Greenland Reveal a Greater Threat of Rising Seas
Scientists have discovered plant and insect remains under a two-mile-deep (three km) ice core extracted from the center of the island, providing the clearest proof yet that nearly all of this vast territory was green within the past million years, when atmospheric carbon levels were much lower than today.
Their research, published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, indicates even greater potential for global sea level rise due to human-caused climate than previously thought.
The stranglehold of government-funded-science meant it took 30 years to do half an hour of research:
The ice core, named GISP2, was drilled in 1993 and although its rock and ice had been studied extensively, nobody had thought to look for fossils in the ’till,’ or the mixed sediment at the bottom.
That’s because until recently the idea that Greenland was ice-free in the recent geologic past seemed too far-fetched.
“Literally, we saw the fossils within the first hour, maybe half hour, of working on it,” lead author Paul Bierman, a professor of environmental science at the University of Vermont, told AFP.
To their amazement, researchers found within this three-inch-layer soil willow wood, spores from spikemoss, fungi, the compound eye of an insect, and a poppy seed – together suggesting a vibrant tundra ecosystem.
The GISP2 site is about as high and central as you can get in Greenland. If the ice was gone there, it was probably gone everywhere. But the same experts who want us to spend $1,000 billion dollars every year, thought that Greenland was an impenetrable ice-fortress.
In 2016 some scientists figured out the bedrock under the GISP core was only 1.1 million years old, which was considered “controversial” since the ice was supposed to have been solid for 2.6 million years. In 2019 Bierman et al were shocked to find that Camp Century (in the far north) had melted totally around 416,000 years ago. (That frozen soil was first dug up in the 1960s, so it sat in a Danish freezer for fifty years.) Another ice core at DYE 3 contained the DNA of spruce trees. Obviously Greenland melts, we just don’t know why, when or how often. The researchers best guess is that the ice melted at the summit probably more than 250,000 years ago and probably less than 1.1 million. Maybe it was 416,000 years ago too.
If the whole ice cap melted, the world’s oceans presumably rose the 7 odd meters they are theoretically supposed to rise. There is no denying that this would be seriously inconvenient today, especially for coastal real estate, but it’s also true to say corals reefs didn’t vanish, there was no mass extinction or runaway Greenhouse apocalypse either. The Earth didn’t turn into Venus.
The important message here should be that natural climate change could smack us over the head, but we don’t understand the big forces at all.
Frankly all those who oppose Fossil Fuels should go live it a Primitive Village without all the Benefits of Fossil Fuel its going to surprise them when they get no food and everyday supplies
Give them sheep, a spinning wheel and a loom Have them make school clothes for their kids.
There are ways to power factories without burning fossil fuels. Even the earliest textile mills back east—full of machinery—were powered without fossil fuels.
So, you feel water power or a mule on a turnstile is the answer. However, since fossil fuels are not really causing any environmental or climate change, why not use the cheapest sources of energy?
Can you imagine being allowed by the EPA to build a waterwheel?
Obama tried to call even puddles from rain on farmland, “navigable waters,” so people had to freeze their land use.
And how quick would the animal lovers come down on a business that even thought of running their machinery via animal power?
Steam? It comes from coal and/or wood.
How about manpower.
Remember Soylent Green? Edward G Robinson, in his last role, keeping the lights on by peddling a stationary bike.
Want that?
And as always just like t hat Fool Greg you babble your nonsense and think were going to believe your a Rocket Scientists while your not at all just someone who believes the M.S. Media is the Truth Wally Kröhnkite was a God
Other than nuclear and large scale hydroelectric power I can’t imagine waterwheels being a viable option. What else do you have? How would we power a steel mill or data center or chip manufacturing or food processing plants, etc. How do we transport the goods? Electric long haul semi trucks? Good luck. Try making batteries without fossil fuels. Just the extra weight of battery powered trucks would do damage to roads and bridges may need to be reinforced to handle the weight as well. Covert all trains to electric power. Fine who pays for the massive change and how do we generate the massive amount of new electricity needed? Regardless we will need more electric power not less and waterwheels might provide a smidge of it but probably not worth it in most cases. It’s been said before and it seems you are a victim of it. Democrats believe in magical thinking.
i can’t decide whether you are stupid, naive or a combination of both. You make claims but don’t back them up.
But leftist con artists can’t scarf up billions of dollars unless they can fabricate a phony existential emergency. Cmon, man!
There’s a reason it’s called Greenland
Yup the Vikings had a really sick sense of humor. Greenland is also much colder than Iceland, with around 80% of the country covered in ice, compared to Iceland’s 11%. As cold as a winter might be in Iceland, it’s nothing close to Greenland, which can drop to around -17 degrees Celsius.
Boiling oceans seem to favor coral
https://davidicke.com/2024/08/10/huge-increase-in-coral-produces-third-year-of-record-highs-on-the-great-barrier-reef/