Ghost Shot: Pfizer quietly admits it will never manufacture original FDA approved COVID vaccines

Spread the love

Loading

by Jordan Schachtel

The August 23, 2021 FDA approval of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine was a cause for celebration. Marked as a turning point in the battle against COVID19, the announcement was highly publicized by the Biden Administration with the clear intention to extinguish “vaccine hesitancy” and boost uptake.
 


 


 
It was celebrated as a cause for national relief, and many Americans arrived at their local pharmacies under the impression, via government and pharmaceutical propaganda, that they were receiving an FDA-approved COVID vaccine. Yet that legally distinct product, as we know it, never existed. And now we know, via Pfizer, that it will never exist.
 
For the uninitiated:
 
Comirnaty is a legally distinct product from the emergency use authorization (EUA) shots, and It has never made its way to market. For months on end, no such vaccine has ever become available. Those who received the “Pfizer shot(s)” have been injected with the emergency use authorization (EUA) version of the shots. See my piece in The Dossier for more info.
 
I fact checked the fact checkers and couldn’t believe what I found. Despite the corporate press, Big Pharma, and the federal government telling us otherwise, it is absolutely true that there is no FDA approved COVID-19 vaccine available in the United States today. And there are no plans to make one available any time soon…
 
The information operation succeeded. There was indeed an FDA approved vaccine, at least on paper, but you couldn’t get it.
 
When originally confronted with this ordeal, Pfizer labeled this issue an inventory question that had nothing to do with the legal distinction between an experimental EUA product and an FDA-approved vaccine. Up until just weeks ago, this was the statement up on the CDC website via Pfizer:

“Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY).  At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename.
 
At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution.  As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels.”

In May, Pfizer updated its statement to mention a December 2021 licensed Comirnaty product, which was granted a license four months after the highly-publicized August FDA press release.
 
And just last week, Pfizer finally acknowledged that its original licensed product will never be distributed. In an unreported update on the CDC website, Pfizer told the agency:

“Pfizer received initial FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename. These NDCs will not be manufacturedOnly NDCs for the subsequently BLA approved tris-sucrose formulation will be produced.”

The key distinction between the originally approved formulation and the tris-sucrose formulation is that — according to manufacturers — the latter can be held for a much longer period of time outside of an ultra cold freezer. These freezers cost over $10,000 a piece and each unit uses as much energy per day as an average American household. Improper storage can render the mRNA unstable.
 
Notably, the clinical trials for the Pfizer shot were conducted without the modified tris-sucrose ingredient. Given the partisan nature of Pfizer, the corporate media, government health bureaucracies, and your correspondent’s lack of expertise in this area, it is unclear whether this is significant.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ivermectin is a scientifically proven treatment for Covid-19. It was necessary to suppress legal and safe treatments so that an hazardous and experimental vaccine sliding through under the emergency authorization could be administered, thus lining the pockets of big pharma donor who helped install rather than elect Biden.

Hundreds of thousands died to support the undemocratic conduct of this regime.

According to their own reporting, vaccine makers have thrown out over 75 MILLION doses in just the USA.
People don’t want them.
But, of course, the gov’t has already paid for them all.
Without the bother of liability and advertizing, these Big Pharma companies have made BILLIONS of dollars in profits.
Why should they go the FDA approval route since it only invites lawsuits for damages they are immune from now?

But, of course, the gov’t has already paid for them all.

And the kickbacks have been sent.


comment image

They want t o reduce the Human Population over the false idea of Over Population and the Population Bomb myth of crack-pots like Paul Ehrlich

The plan is you will own nothing, reduced to a slave where they own everything, you get the waste they get the premium.
Eat bugs and recycled poop, while the pigs get filet minon and fresh veggies.
The media is conditioning us to believe our rights are selfish.
All they do is lie.

Tony strikes again. He finds the dregs of “science” for inhumane experiments, these researchers are sickos.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/federal-government-pays-university-1-5-million-to-start-a-fight-club-for-genetically-modified-hamsters

Last edited 2 years ago by kitt

You appear to be against animal experimentation by scientists, or perhaps you’re simple against animal experimentation that has anything to do with Fauci.

Spread by skin to skin contact
Breaking News: The CDC has raised the status of monkeypox to level two and are now recommending wearing masks.

Lets just look and see these blisters are also a Clot Shot side effect, damage to the immune system, much like shingles.

Get your safe and effective booster, get it into infant vaccine schedules.
Depopulation bomb.

I know the pox is predominantly among butt pokers but, it could spread to groomers as a way the have an equal playing field.

Within days of issuing this proclamation, the CDC cancelled it.
They didn’t want to look that foolish…..Too Late!
Turns out the man who is “patient Zero” in UK with monkeypox had first been kicked out of Saudi Arabia for being HIV positive.
Then he went to some gay bash (not in UK) and had anonymous sex with ten men (knowing he is HIV positive!!!)
THEN he went back to UK (he is British) and had more sex with strangers.
So, he’s freely spreading HIV and he also spread monkeypox.

So, in the USA the CDC made NO warning to gays not to party hard during “Pride” month.
And, what with CA making spreading HIV legal, who knows how many will get it and monkeypox by the end of June.

Last edited 2 years ago by Nan G

Like AIDS, this will be spread due to the total irresponsibility of the gay community. This coming out during the month they are celebrating their successful demagoguery of their gaydom is civilization’s misfortune.

Maybe someone could explain what the author’s point is, given his admitted uncertainty about the significance of the difference between what’s already been produced and a product with longer shelf life—particularly since people are refusing to avail themselves of what’s already available. Tooling up to produce a new version would likely be enormously expensive. Resources would be better utilized preparing to address emerging COVID variants. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations and deaths have been averted with the products on hand.

Given the partisan nature of Pfizer, the corporate media, government health bureaucracies, and your correspondent’s lack of expertise in this area, it is unclear whether this is significant.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg