George Zimmerman back to being plain Hispanic

Spread the love

Loading

Apparently Zimmerman is no longer a “white Hispanic”

The dispute “was between him and his wife and her father,” Morgan said. “There were some allegations that there had been an assault, but we could not confirm any of it.”

Orlando TV station WKMG reported that Shellie Zimmerman’s parents, David and Machelle Dean, live at the home.

WKMG’s SKY 6 helicopter showed at least a half-dozen police squad cars outside the house.

In the divorce petition, Shellie Zimmerman says she and her husband separated a month after Zimmerman, who is Hispanic, was acquitted of any crime for fatally shooting Martin, a black teenager, last July. The verdict sparked protests across the nation.

USA Today

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

136 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

you all got a point to take into account, you all are intelligent people,
you all are well equipted with a way to turn words into means to please or hurt badly,
but but, here it is for self opinion not other like orders or statement of the other profile
because of his or her opinion,
we have no right to assault any other for what word they express,
that is called SELF CONTROL,
LET THIS POST BE A REMINDER that we are here to expose only our opinion,
not to start a war on the other with insults,
you are too smart to loose your CONTROL WHICH DIMINISH THE POWER OF YOUR OPINION,
MY OPINION ONLY

@MataHarley: and let me share some of my thoughts: First

For the second time in the past year – and prior to this (finally) unedited response – I requested Curt to remove me as an author of FA.

Mata, one sure way for you to be removed as an author is: Ta Da, don’t write anything. Simple enough?

So you don’t write much anymore but:

But I will say that I would be more than happy to put up my body of FA author work

you’re willing to brag about how much you write?

I like this:

appealing to those at your (that’s a relatively general “you”) mentality level

I know that what I say and how I say it it reflects on Curt. I don’t think any blog owner wants an author unloading a full metal jacket of genuine, unedited opinion on the mental parasites

Mata, have you been certified as some kind of mental giant? Why doesn’t it show in your writing and your arguments. Usually name calling, your forte’, reflects a relatively low level of intelligence, why would you be different from the norm?

uh, that would be a perfect example of you.. simply because they have no other life but to spout personal insults and BS on this blog 24/7.

You actually think I spend more time on this blog than you do? list your times of comments and compare it to mine. I don’t think you would be surprised that you comment multiple times more per day than I do.
Some quotes:”” tiresome, you’re a loud, crass, pathetically sad and mean ol’ biddy who’s a piss poor example of debate tone and style here. Wouldn’t matter so much except that you’re here, 24/7… effectively masking any of the few sane voices left. Don’t you have a bloody life?

And in doing so, your other friends who also live here virtually 24/7 have apparently been afflicted with your same rude, charm school drop out, virus. Lawdy, even the formerly mild mannered and polite Bees has now found it quite normal to be an uninformed, insulting, combative bitch at all levels. In fact, you all are so devoted to your own lack of social graces that you don’t even mind tearing each other apart with personal insults… ahem RT and tiresome.”” So funny. As I said, a good example of name calling.

@Richard Wheeler:

CURT Marine to Marine. You’ve allowed a few crass, loudmouthed bigots drive away the heart and soul of your once great Conservative blog.
In addition to Mata you’ve lost great contributors like Aye,Word, Larry, John Galt, O.T and others.There is no longer civil, intelligent discourse. You’ve been hijacked and you’re sinking. I can no longer learn anything of value on this site.

Oh my, another Dim/lib getting tired of being told he loves Obama and appeals to conservatives to change their beliefs and go down with him. It must be tough to be one of a small group in the midst of a whirlwind blowing against you.
Whimper RW

@MataHarley:

For the most part, this community has become a constant drone of pompous piety and personal assaults.

Mostly made by you. LOL

@MataHarley:

Now I’m not sure where tiresome gets the regal “we” from, as quoted above. I guess the rest of you didn’t realize she’s the head guru, queen bitch and goddess mentor who speaks for all of you here. But since I will not be missed, as tiresome asserts, you all are welcome to listen to her and ilk’s incessant, and predictably repetitive, worthless daily drone, and log off feeling well “informed”.

Hey, I take exception to that. LOL…
It’s history repeating itself. You got your butt handed to you in the GZ discussion, basically guaranteeing that GZ would be found guilty, then when you lost, you said it was on technicalities. So much for your judgement and opinions. As I said, if you don’t want to publish anything on this blog, just don’t type anything out and don’t hit the ‘Post Comment” key and you won’t have anything written here. We know you’ll still be reading tho. Too Funny.

@retire05: Retire, do you think Mata has taken her toys and gone home? Oh woe is us, what’ll we do? I’ll miss being called crass names (her most childish trait amongst others) but I’m sure we will survive.

@Curt: Nice comment Curt. As I said a few days ago, I like to read others comments, both those I agree with and disagree with. I don’t expect to change anyone’s mind on a blog, just read their opinion and like it or not. If there are some that think it is a necessity to change someone’s opinion, they are likely to be disappointed.

CURT
I LOVE YOUR WISDOM
thank you I LOVE IT HERE

@retire05, #111:

Another intelligent, articulate commentator driven away. These are the moments that a troll lives for, aren’t they?

CURT
FLOPPING ACES
IT IS A DAM BEST BLOG OF ALL,

GREG
THANK YOU BUT I am not going anywhere,

@Mata
I totally agree with everything you said which is why I too very seldom come here much less comment. All of the original authors are mostly gone and the once great debates (I’m remembering some great back and forth’s between you and Larry) have succumbed to name calling and race baiting. This site used to be something great, but now it’s just a cesspool of garbage spewing troglodytes. You are too good for this site and even though you and I butted heads quite a bit, I’ve always respected the hell out of you (same thing with Aye). But like anything in life, all good things must come to an end and unfortunately this bog has come to an end. It’s relevancy long gone. There are plenty of other great blogs out there thirsting for a smart well informed voice. I hope to see you on one of those blogs. Oh and to answer your question regarding “Retired” no she doesn’t have a life which is why she is on here so much and she’s a miserable little biddy full of piss and garlic. I actually feel sorry for people like her as blogs like this is all she really has. Trust me, in a face to face encounter she would buckle under the pressure and crawl back to her cave where it’s safe and warm. Most witches do!

Take Care
Ron H.

@Greg:

Another intelligent, articulate commentator driven away.

Who would that be? According to her, she wasn’t here in spirit anyhow, nobody here ‘smart’ enough to understand her wisdom. Well, except you and RW.

@Ron H.:

(I’m remembering some great back and forth’s between you and Larry) have succumbed to name calling and race baiting.

and let’s be truthful, Mata is about as big a name caller as anyone can be. Haven’t seen any race baiting, but will concede that libs are usually the one’s guilty of that, but, as I say, I haven’t seen that on this blog.

troglodytes
1.a prehistoric cave dweller.
2.a person of degraded, primitive, or brutal character.
3.a person living in seclusion.
4.a person unacquainted with affairs of the world.
5.an animal living underground.

Ron, while you are on your soapbox:

Oh and to answer your question regarding “Retired” no she doesn’t have a life which is why she is on here so much and she’s a miserable little biddy full of piss and garlic. I actually feel sorry for people like her as blogs like this is all she really has.

Think about who the ‘name caller’ is here.
Are you saying you’re better than a miserable little biddy full of piss and garlic? What are some of your attributes that allow you to stand on a soapbox spewing garbage and calling names and feel like you are above the fray?
Now here’s a funny one:

I actually feel sorry for people like her as blogs like this is all she really has

I’m sure your pity is what she is here seeking, LOL. And yet, here you are running down this site and blog and the people on it, and what are you doing? You’re one of those people you are attempting to put in your class, and addressing it to someone(Mata) that has just said she won’t be here anymore to read your crap. So just who are you addressing it to? Your ego? Pot, meet kettle.

These Dims and libs think they are so superior. FO!!!

Retire, feel free.

@Redteam:

Retire, feel free.

You asked:

Retire, do you think Mata has taken her toys and gone home?

Nah, I think she will lurk around, hiding in the dark corners, until she thinks her pity party has been forgotten. And then she will be back, to spin what she actually said, into something that doesn’t even closely resemble what she said here today. That’s her m.o.

Look, everyone is entitled to their opinion. You and I can disagree on an issue, we present our side, read the other side, and try to counter point. But those like Mata, et al, demand that you accept their opinion as the only right one, and if you don’t, your nothing more than a “sexist pig.” Odd, that term, since basically it went out with the ’70’s. And if you don’t agree, then you are not living up to their standard of a “conservative,” whatever that is.

RW likes certain people that post here because he supports their form of “conservatism”, i.e. he is a leftist who agrees with those who claim the mantilla of conservatism when they support his side of the aisle. Frankly, if I considered myself a conservative and found RW in my corner, I would have to re-evaluate my positions. Never has a liberal/progressive agreed with anything said by a honest-to-God conservative.

As I said before; no one ever changed anyone’s mind on a blog. It is simply a place to vent. But if you don’t like what is being said, and replied to, move on.

One other thing; those who think it is cool to ridicule people because of their age must think they will never reach that age. It is age discrimination, pure and simple. Arrogance of youth, so to speak. These are the same people that would have told Benjamin Franklin to go home to his rocking chair because he was just too damn old to matter.

@retire05:

One other thing; those who think it is cool to ridicule people because of their age must think they will never reach that age.

True, tho I don’t think, from what you say that you’re quite as old as I am, but Mata has to be near it because she was already married during the Viet Nam war, so that would make her fairly old. Surely old enough to not be referring to someone else as an ‘old’ biddie. RW served as an officer in the Viet Nam war, so he must be about my age also. I finished my Navy enlistment in 1961, some time ago.

I agree with you that Mata didn’t take her toys and go home, I think your assessment was about right on her. She’s done that bit before, I’m not sure she remembers it though. She never did come back to StrataSphere when he side lost. Didn’t want to have to hang her head, I guess.

@Redteam:

I find it all pretty funny, actually. Who, in their right mind, gets so hyper over comments by anonymous posters on a blog? Can you imagine what those people are like to debate in person? And then to adopt the attitude that “you’re not a conservative because you’re not MY kind of conservative” is just so much bunk. I thought there was just one litmus test; the Constitution.

I really don’t care how old anyone is, be they 18 or 80. Hopefully age brings a little wisdom, but that doesn’t seem apparent in all cases.

We have been advised that this blog is doomed because it is over run with “troglodytes.” I suggest that person check out the number of readers/supporters of AOSHQ.

@Scott in Oklahoma:

His story didn’t substantially change,

I guess we have different opinions of what constitutes “substantially”. I would think that if I just shot and killed someone I would have a fair recollection of the events that transpired. He gave a written statement and four interviews within three days which all have (IMO) “substantial” differences in regards to where TM came from and what he said to GZ. I can only assume from your comments, you – a seasoned law enforcement investigator – don’t think it’s a substantial change to state that the victim “jumped out from the bushes” when the video of his reenactment clearly shows that’s impossible. And this is where GZ lived, the neighborhood he spent his nights patrolling, so you’d think he knew the terrain. To be clear, that’s an insignificant detail to your trained eye? Or, could we be talking about a man who clearly lied in his initial interviews to lay the groundwork for what he probably assumed was a cake walk self-defense plea and was caught out as the methodical investigation forced him to contend with the realities of the actual geography of his neighborhood. Just an amateur speculating here. You’re the expert.

@Redteam:

You lost, get over it.

Simpleton thinking. What am I getting over? Do you really think a trial verdict is a referendum on anything but the evidence presented? You seem to see it as a referendum on this man’s charachter, the man you’ve been rooting for, who made you a “winner”.

The outcome of the trial hasn’t changed my opinion of GZ one iota. The history of his run ins with law enforcement point to a loose cannon with a propensity for violence. Just because his father-in-law isn’t pressing charges doesn’t change the fact GZ punched him in the face. You think whether he’s charged with a crime makes a difference?

I don’t want to insinuate that a local Police Chief, who actually has to deal with 911 calls relating to GZ, has more insight into the man than you, because clearly that would be ridiculous. However, I think it’s worth noting that Lake Mary Police Chief Steve Bracknell appears to agree in a series of emails that Zimmerman is a “ticking time bomb” and another “Sandy Hook” or “Aurora” “waiting to happen.” He also confirms that GZ punched his father-in-law in the nose (in his own house) and broke his wife’s Ipad.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/09/george-zimmermans-local-police-chief-agrees-hes-sandy-hookwaiting-happen/69368/

Rodriguez: “George is a ticking time bomb its [sic] becoming obvious … Zimmerman is a Sandy Hook, Aurora waiting to happen,”

Bracknell” “Your reference to Sandy Hook……………. I agree,”

But he’s just the guy responsible for dealing with the fall out. Your opinion is the one that carries weight, RT, right?

@Tom: Tom:

Simpleton thinking. What am I getting over? Do you really think a trial verdict is a referendum on anything but the evidence presented? You seem to see it as a referendum on this man’s charachter, the man you’ve been rooting for,

rooting for? Where and when was I ‘rooting’ for anyone? So, in your mind, if you’ve just been battered by several slams of your head on concrete and punched in the face and had your nose broken, you would have ‘vivid recall’ of all the minute details of the attack?

The outcome of the trial hasn’t changed my opinion of GZ one iota.

Mine either, prior to the trial, I thought GZ was a neighborhood watch person that was attacked by a thug and he shot the thug in self defense. The jury agrees with that. You were totally wrong, and the jury agrees with that. So why change your mind? You obviously don’t mind being wrong and sticking with it. That’s the mentality of most Dims/Libs.

I don’t want to insinuate that a local Police Chief, who actually has to deal with 911 calls relating to GZ, has more insight into the man than you,

LOL, you talking the Lake Mary police chief or the Sanford one? As you know, because the Sanford chief didn’t press charges, he was relieved of his job. Turns out, he was right.

another “Sandy Hook”

? Wow, a man that defends himself is likely to shoot children? Hmmm?

Your opinion is the one that carries weight, RT, right?

Actually, it was the jury’s opinion that carried weight, I’d say.
Just like Mata, can’t take a loss.

@Redteam:

I thought GZ was a neighborhood watch person that was attacked by a thug and he shot the thug in self defense. The jury agrees with that.

I’ll just let you try to figure out on your own this time why that’s an idiotic statement on multiple levels.

Just like Mata, can’t take a loss.

Perhaps she just grew weary correcting someone over and over who I suspect may be mentally impaired.

@Tom:

Perhaps she just grew weary correcting someone over and over who I suspect may be mentally impaired

All you have done is prove that liberalism IS a mental illness.

@Tom

:I’ll just let you try to figure out on your own this time why that’s an idiotic statement on multiple levels.

Idiotic? so you think the jurors were idiots because they ruled on the evidence. Yes, I’m sure you’d like for there to be some deep dark secret, conspiracy that just didn’t come to light, even tho they made every semi legal move they could think of to prejudice the jury, but since there was none, they(and you) just will have to live with your disappointment that libs are not ALWAYS right.

Perhaps she just grew weary

Nope, I’m pretty sure she got here weary of a life that must be a disappointment that everyone doesn’t see everything the way she does.

You fun, Tom. Keep it up. Have you checked out ‘whentostopdiggin.com’?

George Zimmerman back in the news.

Back in Nov. his ex-girlfriend had claimed he was breaking up her home and pointing a gun at her.
Police found him cooperative and took two different caliber guns from his possession along with parts of two boxes (50/box) of ammo.
She had gone public just the other day that she didn’t want to press charges.
So, today, AP reports:
Prosecutor: no domestic charges against Zimmerman –

Samantha Scheibe´s decision not to cooperate and the lack of other corroborating evidence would have made the case difficult to prove, State Attorney Phil Archer in Seminole County said in a statement. “There is no reasonable likelihood of a successful prosecution,” Archer said.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20131211/DAAKE1GG0.html