GARM ‘Advertising Cartel’ Shuts Down 48 Hours After X, Rumble File Lawsuit

Spread the love

Loading

by Tyler Durden

48 hours after X and Rumble filed a lawsuit against the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) ‘advertising cartel’ and several members, the World Federation of Advertisers announced it will shutter GARM, saying in a statement reported by Business Insider that they’re “a not-for-profit organization with limited resources.”

That obviously strains credulity considering they do the bidding of companies representing hundreds of billions in market cap, including CVS Health, Mars, Orsted and Unilever.

In an email to members, Stephan Loerke, the CEO of the WFA, said that the decision was “not made lightly.” Loerke also said that they intend to contest the allegations in X’s lawsuit – and were confident that the outcome would “demonstrate our full adherence to competition rules in all our activities.”

The lawsuit alleges that GARM’s members illegally conspired to “collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from Twitter, now known as X. The lawsuit also names Unilever, Mars, CVS, and Ørsted.

In response to the announcement, X CEO Linda Yaccarino said the platform that “No small group should be able to monopolize what gets monetized. This is an important acknowledgement and a necessary step in the right direction. I am hopeful that it means ecosystem-wide reform is coming.”

GARM was founded in 2019 by WFA, a global association representing over 150 of the world’s biggest brands and over 60 national advertiser associations which created GARM in 2019. Its members include heavyweights such as Unilever, Mars, Diageo, Procter & Gamble (P&G), GroupM, AB InBev, L’Oréal, Nestlé, IBM, Mastercard, and PepsiCo. These corporations not only wield immense economic influence but are accused of leveraging this power to control online discourse under the guise of “brand safety.”

This alliance quickly amassed significant market power, representing roughly 90% of global advertising spend, which amounts to nearly one trillion dollars annually.

Following Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter, advertising plummeted. The lawsuit alleges that after Musk acquired the company, GARM persuaded top brands to yank advertising.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Deep state was trying to go after Elon Musk like they went after Trump.
It’s been a multi-pronged attempt with many fronts.
Because Boeing has a shuttle attached to the ISS and no way to detach it, Musk is the only one who can get the astronauts home.(The 7 day planned visit up there is now in its 49th day.)
But joe would rather these space people die than give Musk a chance to rescue them.
No attempt will even be made before January of 2025.
This advertising freeze by the speech police failed only because Musk has both deep pockets and an “I don’t give a damn how much it costs,” attitude toward fighting the Orwellians.