This may well be the most important article I’ll write in 2023.
In this article, I publicly reveal record-level vax-death data from the “gold standard” Medicare database that proves that:
The vaccines are making it more likely that the elderly will die prematurely, not less likely
The risk of death remains elevated for an unknown period of time after you get the shot (we didn’t see it return to normal)
The CDC lied to the American people about the safety of these vaccines. They had access to this data the entire time and kept it hidden and said nothing.
If there is one article for you to share with your social network, this is the one.
Executive summary
Isn’t it a shame that none of the world’s governments make the vaccination-death records publicly available? My claim is that if they did that, it would end the debate instantly and prove to the world that the vaccines are unsafe. So that’s why they keep it locked up.
But apparently there is one whistleblower who is interested in data transparency.
I was able to authenticate the data by matching it with records I already had. And the analysis that I did on the data I received matches up with other analyses I have received previously.
The nice thing about this Medicare data is that nobody can claim that it is “unreliable.” Medicare is the unassailable “gold-standard” database. It’s the database that the CDC never wants us to see for some reason. They never even mention it. They pretend it doesn’t exist. So you know it is important.
Do you want to know what it shows?
It shows that these shots increase your risk of dying and once you get shot, your risk of dying remains elevated for an unknown amount of time. And that’s in the very population it is supposed to help the most!
Now you know why the CDC, which has always had access to the Medicare records, has never made them publicly available for anyone to analyze to prove that the vaccines are safe. Because the records show the opposite. That’s why they keep the data hidden from view and it’s why they NEVER talk about it.
Today, in this article, you will finally get to see what nobody outside the HHS has ever seen before: the “gold standard” Medicare records, i.e., the truth. You can analyze it yourself.
You’ll soon see for yourself why the CDC will never release this data and why the mainstream press is NEVER EVER going to ask to see the data: because it would reveal they lied to people and killed over 500,000 Americans by recommending they take an unsafe “vaccine.”
The bottom line is this:
When there is no data transparency, there is a high chance that the government is lying to you.
After all, if the data supported their narrative, they’d be tripping all over themselves to release the data. When it doesn’t support the narrative, they simply never talk about it and pretend it doesn’t exist and tell the press never to ask about it.
So you already know how this is going to end. Very badly. For Biden, the CDC, the FDA, the mainstream medical community, the mainstream press, and Congress. They all will have egg on their face because they never asked to see the data.
The “misinformation spreaders” will have been proven right with the government’s own “gold standard” database. It’s payback time.
Acknowledgements
I had Clare Craig of the HART Group look this over for any flaws. She liked it.
Professor Norman Fenton had a look as well and he didn’t find anything amiss either.
This doesn’t mean there aren’t any flaws, but it just means that there aren’t any obvious flaws. If you find a mistake, let me know in the comments.
Why this article is so important
If nobody can explain how the “slope goes the wrong way,” then this should be GAME OVER for the vaccination program because we are using their own “gold standard” database to prove that the vaccines are not safe and that they lied to us.
Unless I made a serious error, there is no rock big enough for them to hide under on this one. No excuses. No attacks. It’s basically bulletproof. The results simply cannot be explained if the vaccines are safe. And the numbers are huge. You don’t need a peer reviewed study on this one.
The Medicare data that I received
It’s in Excel, there are over 114,000 records, and you can download it here.
While I would have liked to receive the merge of all death records and vaccination records of everyone in the US, the data I did receive, when properly analyzed, is sufficient to prove the point that the vaccines are increasing your risk of death.
LIMITATIONS
Be sure to read the About tab for caveats about the data. It will help if you read and understand this article before you look at the records.
MEDICARE DATA NOTA BENE
Note that the scatter plots below were produced from a much larger set of Medicare records than the ones you can download. The plots from the records I received are included in the Excel spreadsheet and are consistent with the plots in this article which are the higher quality plots (and which contain dose 2 and 3 plots).
Overview of how to analyze the Medicare records
Because we only have vax-death records of people who have died (rather than the full set of records that any truly honest government would supply), we have to analyze the data in a certain way to understand what is going on.
This is a new way to look at the data so let me give you the bird’s eye overview first.
The main thing is that in Jan 2021 we have a double whammy of death: from COVID and seasonality (older people die more in winter).
Figure 0. Days to death from Dec 15, 2020 in Medicare in Connecticut. Each bar is a 5 day period. The point of this graph is to show that the COVID outbreak exacerbated the slope since you are seeing effects of seasonality PLUS the waning part of a COVID outbreak. This is why there is a 40% drop from peak values.
So if the vaccine does absolutely nothing, we’ll see the slope of the histogram of the deaths per day curve go dramatically down in the first quarter as COVID and seasonality effects diminish. Then it will flatline for a time until seasonality picks up again in winter or there is another big COVID outbreak. The drop could be as much as 40% from the peak value (e.g., from 536 to 324) in Figure 0.
If the vaccine is PERFECT, we’ll see the same slope go down, but not as much because we’ll just see seasonality effects going down (since nobody is dying from COVID). It will then remain perfectly flat until it picks up again in winter. See Figure 1 below for what the “deaths per week” curve should look like for a perfect vaccine.
The main point is this: if the vaccine isn’t causing harm, the slope will go down and remain flat.
What I will be doing below is calculating the days until death from shot #1 if and only if shot #1 was given in Q1 of 2021. So that histogram should look very similar to Figure 1. It’s going to be smoothed somewhat since the shot was given over a quarter (rather than on a single day), but since most of the vaccine in Q1 was delivered in the first half of January, the curve will be pretty similar to Figure 1, but it will start to flatline a couple of weeks sooner.
Once you understand these concepts, you are ready for the details.
For people in Medicare, there is a strong seasonality effect on the death rate
For the elderly, there is a strong seasonality of deaths. They are high in the winter and low in the summer. The difference between peaks and troughs is around 20%. This data is from the CDC for ages 65-84:
Figure 1. This is the weekly death counts from 2015-2019 summed over all US states for ages 65-84. This was created using a visualization on the CDC website using this dataset. Epidemiologists are very familiar with this effect. There are no surprises here. The peak is 256K, the trough is 213, so there is a 17% seasonality drop in deaths from the peak.
What this means is if you got the shot in Q1 of 2021, and you look at the days until death, if the vaccines are safe, you should find that it will go lower in time and then turn upwards.
But what we find is the opposite.
The control group for 2021
Figure 2 shows the deaths by week in 2021 for all states ages 65-84. Note that the rates drop for the first 11 weeks and stabilize.
In 2021, there is a steeper drop than normal because of COVID adding to the drop:
Figure 2. This is the weekly death counts summed over all US states for 2021. This is essentially the control graph. This was created using a visualization on the CDC website using this dataset. Epidemiologists are very familiar with this effect. There are no surprises here. The deaths drop for the first 11 weeks of the year then stabilize. The peak is 81K, the trough is 50K so there is a 39% combined drop from peak to trough.
The vaccine program was initiated on Dec 14, 2020, and peaked in the third week of Jan 2021 for people in this age group:
Figure 3. Connecticut vax rollout schedule for <80 Medicare participants peaked in weeks 3 and 4 of 2021. Each bar is a week
This means that if we limit our “days from shot #1 to death” analysis to people who got their first vaccine in Q1 of 2021, if the shot is harmless, we should see the rate of deaths dropping for at least 9 weeks after the shot, and then remaining flat for the next 15 weeks before turning upward. This is because about half the shots got delivered before week #3 (11-2=9)
What a better way to depopulate the Earth over Erlich and his Population Bomb scam
another vet
2 years ago
It looks like another conspiracy theory has been proven to be true just like Covid coming from a lab, the vaccine doesn’t prevent you from getting or transmitting the virus, and ivermectin is a viable treatment option. Not only have they destroyed trust in the government, they’ve destroyed it in the medical community as well.
Nathan Blue
2 years ago
Things we now know concerning Covid-19:
It is man-made, from the SARS virus, and escaped/was released from the Wuhan Institution of Virology in Wuhan, China.Fauci and our government lied about N95s working in the beginning because they didn’t want normal people hoarding them.Cloth masks don’t work.Ivermectin and HCQ, two safe and effective antivirals that don’t make money for the Big Pharma, were banned and criminally suppressed for phrama profits, killing millions.The mRNA treatment (not a true vaccine) kills healthy people more often than the virus itself.Pfizer and others made TRILLIONS from a regime-backed forcing of their product on the rest of us.Everything above is VERIFIED FACT.
The regime, and the donors who installed them, are guilty of crimes against humanity.
Last edited 2 years ago by Nathan Blue
kitt
2 years ago
This is really old news, we knew it at the start, the vaxx didnt work and elderly died from getting it. Gates Final solution. It is sterilizing the next generation just like Gates sterilized those in Africa some at gun point.
But baby this aint game over, not by a long “shot”.
They have patented a bird flu, just like Covid 19. Magically the WHO are warning this is the next pandemic……
Greg
2 years ago
A load of horse manure. The writer bombards you with charts and graphs until your brain is numb, and then throws out a simplistic bottom line “conclusion”. Take note of the fact that a few “minor” disclaimers appear at the top of the spreadsheet, a number of which could be serious flaws in the logic leading to the writer’s conclusion:
These are NOT the complete vaccination records in all 50 States for people who died in Medicare on or before Feb 1, 2023 and had at least one vaccine
You should be aware of the following:
1. A small portion of the Medicare records have people who got vaccinated AFTER they died. These records have been deleted.
2. Whatever query produced these records did NOT get all the records for people who died since their vaccine. It seems like it is a random subset of this data.
3. The data is from all 50 states from the Medicare system
4. Medicare does NOT have vaccination records for many people who got vaccinated outside of the Medicare system. Thus many people who appear “unvaccinated” are not.
5. This is ONLY deaths of people under age 80 who received at least one vaccination *AND* died on or before Feb 1, 2023.
6. Spot checks of the records with records I have authenticate these as legit Medicare records.
7. Be careful when looking at first vaccination data after October 2021. It may in fact be a third shot but “appear” to be a first shot due to record keeping errors.
8. The fact that the rate of deaths goes up so quickly from day 0 is inexplicable. I’ve seen records for other vaccines and they are a flat line from day 0; there is no “healthy patient bias” present for other vaccines. It’s almost as if someone has gone into medicare and systematically either removed these deaths or moved them to a different date. What is supposed to happen for a safe vaccine is after Day 0, the death rate should almost instantly snap to the baseline death rate for the age cohort under study.
I began losing confidence in the analysis with #1. Vaccination after death casts doubt on the validity of the data. That was dealt with by simply throwing the impossible information out, and then assuming the remainder to be accurate. How do think that would work out with a statistical drug safety study?
Move on to disclaimer #2: “Whatever query produced these records did NOT get all the records for people who died since their vaccine. It seems like it is a random subset of this data.”
Seriously? A random subset? You can’t make valid generalizations based on a random subset. What you need is a random sampling, which is something entirely different.
#5. “This is ONLY deaths of people under age 80 who received at least one vaccination *AND* died on or before Feb 1, 2023.”
You’re drawing conclusions about efficacy of a vaccine by looking only at people who died? Seriously?
Efficacy has to do with the overall reduction in serious illness and deaths among the entire vaccinated population, or entire specific subcategories of that population. Looking only at those who died tells you nothing about efficacy.
Norwegian officials said 23 people had died in the country a short time after receiving their first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine. Of those deaths, 13 have been autopsied, with the results suggesting that common side effects may have contributed to se…
Even mild side effects can be deadly to the frail, you dont get it do you? Why jab them anyway you heartless bastard.
Pfizer and BioNTech are working with the Norwegian regulator to investigate the deaths in Norway, Pfizer said in an e-mailed statement. The agency found that “the number of incidents so far is not alarming, and in line with expectations,” Pfizer said…
From early 2021
Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/international/covid-19-vaccine-23-senior-citizens-die-after-taking-pfizer-shot-939742.html.
greg, you’re not educated, or even intelligent enough, to put out your shit-show of your bot-based delusions and muddying of the water for ANYONE to take you seriously.
Just take the L and STFU. Covid was a scam, and it killed millions.
Michael Shellenberger
@ShellenbergerMD
·
9h
Now that the U.S. Department of Energy has joined FBI in concluding that the coronavirus likely leaked from a lab, it’s worth remembering that the media, en masse, condemned the lab leak theory as a “debunked conspiracy theory,” and Facebook censored people who dared suggest it
I know faulty logic when I see it.
Oh yeah?
What do you have to say for yourself?
People were censored for this. Now our own government is admitting it.
Do you? You haven’t figured out that when the leftist media lies to you 99% of the time, there’s a good logical chance they are lying the other 1% of the time.
If they’re studying “dying BECAUSE of the vaccine” by looking only at people who died, they’ve already assumed the truth of their conclusion. This is a logical fallacy. A bogus argument, by definition. It doesn’t matter how many charts and graphs it’s decorated with, or how eloquently it’s presented. It’s still bogus.
No, they aren’t assuming the vaccine killed them, they are looking to see if it did. The point is, unless the vaccine was intended to kill them, efficacy is not a concern.
Nope. Every person in their sample was selected because he or she both had vaccine and is dead. That makes it impossible to determine if vaccination played any part at all in their death. All you can say with certainty is that every one of them died of something.
You could just as easily select a sample consisting entirely of people who both had vaccine and are alive, and then claim it proves vaccination NEVER causes death. It would be the same logical fallacy, and just as bogus.
Nathan, are you saying those who worked all their lives and are now struggling to live off a Social Security check do not have the right to vote?
That’s a good question, and I’d say “yes.” It’s not a question of what you did in your life, it’s what are you paying to maintain the government now.
Harsh? Perhaps, but in the end the idea of people getting paid to live by the government makes them slaves, whether that be food stamps or SS.
I’m Gen X. We won’t get SS. Neither will Millennials or my Gen Z kids. My SS tax is merely paying for a socialist experiment that only one Generation, the very entitled Boomers, will get.
If so, you’re way out of line.
I can see how you’d feel that way, but think about how no American before or after you guys has this benefit.
It’s not a question of what you did in your life, it’s what are you paying to maintain the government now.
So, by your standards, one has a cradle to grave responsibility to pay enough taxes to sustain a government that we never asked for and never wanted and was never intended by the founders
Perhaps, but in the end the idea of people getting paid to live by the government makes them slaves, whether that be food stamps or SS.
Those receiving Social Security are not the same as those receiving social welfare. Social Security is a program (albiet a Ponzi scam) that citizens were forced to pay into from the deductions made on even their very first pay check. Social Security is a return on an investment forcibly made in the Federal government.
My SS tax is merely paying for a socialist experiment that only one Generation, the very entitled Boomers, will get.
Well, it seems you are lacking historical knowledge of SS. The very first check (a one time payment) went out in 1937. The first monthly checks were sent in 1940, before I was born. So how many generations did that go to since then that reached retirement age after 1940? The boomers (post 1946) are NOT the first generation to see Social Security payments.
You seem to want to have the Constitution honored. Show me where that document even hits that no one not contributing to the tax base would be denied the right of the vote.
Nope. Every person in their sample was selected because he or she both had vaccine and is dead. That makes it impossible to determine if vaccination played any part at all in their death.
Assuming everyone is stupid and tailoring your argument to that level of intelligence only shows the limited level of intelligence you possess, but it is a common affliction of leftists. You think it is impossible to determine the cause of death after someone has died? No wonder you can’t make a cognizant argument on any topic.
No it’s not. Those responsible for this medically-induced genocide are afraid of paying the consequences for their actions.
No amount of paid trolls will counteract the effects the truth is having on the global population:
We were lied to…over and over again.
The virus was man-made.
Ivermectin and HCQ were effective against it.
The “vax” is dangerous and is only appropriate for the fat and old.
Companies got filthy rich on the backs of dead Americans and dead people of the world.
No, let’s address all the crap you wrote about how people were nothing but low-life scum if they refused to take the jab for the good of the world all the while lying Fauci was telling us the jab would prevent us from getting the Kung Flu.
Comrade Greggie, I have been aware of your tactics for years.
First, you make statements (letting your mouth overload your a$$, so to speak) on an issue, but when questioned about it or asked to back up your claims, you glibly either toddle off to another thread or you respond with some idiotic response like “See what I mean?” which simply means “Sorry, won’t answer that. I let my mouth overload my a$$.”
Being a pathetic idiot is no way for you to go through life, but alas, you seem to enjoy being dumber than the court jester.
Greg you still have yet to tell me how many departments are there in the government its been years you have never answered.
But to your point what exactly did you ask I got lost in the cut and paste bullshit.
I began losing confidence in the analysis with #1. Vaccination after death casts doubt on the validity of the data. That was dealt with by simply throwing the impossible information out, and then assuming the remainder to be accurate. How do think that would work out with a statistical drug safety study?
Move on to disclaimer #2: “Whatever query produced these records did NOT get all the records for people who died since their vaccine. It seems like it is a random subset of this data.”
Seriously? A random subset? You can’t make valid generalizations based on a random subset. What you need is a random sampling, which is something entirely different.
#5. “This is ONLY deaths of people under age 80 who received at least one vaccination *AND* died on or before Feb 1, 2023.”
You’re drawing conclusions about efficacy of a vaccine by looking only at people who died? Seriously?
Efficacy has to do with the overall reduction in serious illness and deaths among the entire vaccinated population, or entire specific subcategories of that population. Looking only at those who died tells you nothing about efficacy.
In none of that subjective, mostly fluff drivel to you address anything at all.
Your strange obsession with #1 and your subsequent ranting about it prove the point, as you continue to say nothing and mean nothing in the rest of your diatribe.
You’re obscuring and blowing smoke. Not going to work.
What happened to Damar Hamlin? Why won’t the hospital confirm what caused him to collapse and why does Hamlin have to keep quiet?
Nan G
2 years ago
Map showing how many per 100,000 came down with covid.
Note AFRICA.
Much of Africa uses ivermectin to prevent parasitic infections common there.
The vaccination rate of covid there is low.
So, what protected all these millions of people?
Ivermectin works.
What a better way to depopulate the Earth over Erlich and his Population Bomb scam
It looks like another conspiracy theory has been proven to be true just like Covid coming from a lab, the vaccine doesn’t prevent you from getting or transmitting the virus, and ivermectin is a viable treatment option. Not only have they destroyed trust in the government, they’ve destroyed it in the medical community as well.
Things we now know concerning Covid-19:
It is man-made, from the SARS virus, and escaped/was released from the Wuhan Institution of Virology in Wuhan, China.Fauci and our government lied about N95s working in the beginning because they didn’t want normal people hoarding them.Cloth masks don’t work.Ivermectin and HCQ, two safe and effective antivirals that don’t make money for the Big Pharma, were banned and criminally suppressed for phrama profits, killing millions.The mRNA treatment (not a true vaccine) kills healthy people more often than the virus itself.Pfizer and others made TRILLIONS from a regime-backed forcing of their product on the rest of us.Everything above is VERIFIED FACT.
The regime, and the donors who installed them, are guilty of crimes against humanity.
This is really old news, we knew it at the start, the vaxx didnt work and elderly died from getting it. Gates Final solution. It is sterilizing the next generation just like Gates sterilized those in Africa some at gun point.
But baby this aint game over, not by a long “shot”.
They have patented a bird flu, just like Covid 19. Magically the WHO are warning this is the next pandemic……
A load of horse manure. The writer bombards you with charts and graphs until your brain is numb, and then throws out a simplistic bottom line “conclusion”. Take note of the fact that a few “minor” disclaimers appear at the top of the spreadsheet, a number of which could be serious flaws in the logic leading to the writer’s conclusion:
I began losing confidence in the analysis with #1. Vaccination after death casts doubt on the validity of the data. That was dealt with by simply throwing the impossible information out, and then assuming the remainder to be accurate. How do think that would work out with a statistical drug safety study?
Move on to disclaimer #2: “Whatever query produced these records did NOT get all the records for people who died since their vaccine. It seems like it is a random subset of this data.”
Seriously? A random subset? You can’t make valid generalizations based on a random subset. What you need is a random sampling, which is something entirely different.
#5. “This is ONLY deaths of people under age 80 who received at least one vaccination *AND* died on or before Feb 1, 2023.”
You’re drawing conclusions about efficacy of a vaccine by looking only at people who died? Seriously?
Efficacy has to do with the overall reduction in serious illness and deaths among the entire vaccinated population, or entire specific subcategories of that population. Looking only at those who died tells you nothing about efficacy.
You are spot on.
No he’s not.
Norwegian officials said 23 people had died in the country a short time after receiving their first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine. Of those deaths, 13 have been autopsied, with the results suggesting that common side effects may have contributed to se…
Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/international/covid-19-vaccine-23-senior-citizens-die-after-taking-pfizer-shot-939742.html
Even mild side effects can be deadly to the frail, you dont get it do you? Why jab them anyway you heartless bastard.
Pfizer and BioNTech are working with the Norwegian regulator to investigate the deaths in Norway, Pfizer said in an e-mailed statement. The agency found that “the number of incidents so far is not alarming, and in line with expectations,” Pfizer said…
From early 2021
Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/international/covid-19-vaccine-23-senior-citizens-die-after-taking-pfizer-shot-939742.html.
greg, you’re not educated, or even intelligent enough, to put out your shit-show of your bot-based delusions and muddying of the water for ANYONE to take you seriously.
Just take the L and STFU. Covid was a scam, and it killed millions.
I know faulty logic when I see it.
Michael Shellenberger
@ShellenbergerMD
·
9h
Now that the U.S. Department of Energy has joined FBI in concluding that the coronavirus likely leaked from a lab, it’s worth remembering that the media, en masse, condemned the lab leak theory as a “debunked conspiracy theory,” and Facebook censored people who dared suggest it
Oh yeah?
What do you have to say for yourself?
People were censored for this. Now our own government is admitting it.
I know a traitor trying to hide when I see it.
Do you? You haven’t figured out that when the leftist media lies to you 99% of the time, there’s a good logical chance they are lying the other 1% of the time.
If they are studying dying BECAUSE of the vaccine, the efficacy is not the question, unless we are talking about assisted suicide.
If they’re studying “dying BECAUSE of the vaccine” by looking only at people who died, they’ve already assumed the truth of their conclusion. This is a logical fallacy. A bogus argument, by definition. It doesn’t matter how many charts and graphs it’s decorated with, or how eloquently it’s presented. It’s still bogus.
No, they aren’t assuming the vaccine killed them, they are looking to see if it did. The point is, unless the vaccine was intended to kill them, efficacy is not a concern.
Nope. Every person in their sample was selected because he or she both had vaccine and is dead. That makes it impossible to determine if vaccination played any part at all in their death. All you can say with certainty is that every one of them died of something.
You could just as easily select a sample consisting entirely of people who both had vaccine and are alive, and then claim it proves vaccination NEVER causes death. It would be the same logical fallacy, and just as bogus.
About half of Americans don’t pay income tax.
They shouldn’t be allowed to vote, because they’ve paid nothing into our system.
Nathan, are you saying those who worked all their lives and are now struggling to live off a Social Security check do not have the right to vote?
If so, you’re way out of line.
That’s a good question, and I’d say “yes.” It’s not a question of what you did in your life, it’s what are you paying to maintain the government now.
Harsh? Perhaps, but in the end the idea of people getting paid to live by the government makes them slaves, whether that be food stamps or SS.
I’m Gen X. We won’t get SS. Neither will Millennials or my Gen Z kids. My SS tax is merely paying for a socialist experiment that only one Generation, the very entitled Boomers, will get.
I can see how you’d feel that way, but think about how no American before or after you guys has this benefit.
I’d even add that only veterans of the military or civil service should be able to vote.
Democrats and the Uniparty at large are buying off people with no skin in the game.
Remember this the next time the right tells you they have no intention to end Social Security and Medicare.
They’ll claim they’re saving the system.
We will remember if not drastically reformed Democrats watched both crash and burn.
While giving a Comedian puppet 100 billion.
I’m not on the Right. Most of Americans are Moderates, which is why the majority voted for Moderate Donald Trump.
You people NEED to keep the myth of “right/left” going.
It’s not an issue of wanting to end Medicare. We’ve all been informed it’s going to end on it’s own.
So, by your standards, one has a cradle to grave responsibility to pay enough taxes to sustain a government that we never asked for and never wanted and was never intended by the founders
Those receiving Social Security are not the same as those receiving social welfare. Social Security is a program (albiet a Ponzi scam) that citizens were forced to pay into from the deductions made on even their very first pay check. Social Security is a return on an investment forcibly made in the Federal government.
Well, it seems you are lacking historical knowledge of SS. The very first check (a one time payment) went out in 1937. The first monthly checks were sent in 1940, before I was born. So how many generations did that go to since then that reached retirement age after 1940? The boomers (post 1946) are NOT the first generation to see Social Security payments.
You seem to want to have the Constitution honored. Show me where that document even hits that no one not contributing to the tax base would be denied the right of the vote.
Income tax is a fine you pay for being productive, pure theft.
Can we all put Zelensky in as a dependent this year?
Should people who aren’t allowed to vote be allowed to own and carry firearms?
Yes.
Assuming everyone is stupid and tailoring your argument to that level of intelligence only shows the limited level of intelligence you possess, but it is a common affliction of leftists. You think it is impossible to determine the cause of death after someone has died? No wonder you can’t make a cognizant argument on any topic.
Right, Deplorable Me.
Its called an “autopsy.”
It’s been around for hundreds of years and they are only getting better at doing them.
This is unknown technology to Greg.
This article is pure BS.
No it’s not. Those responsible for this medically-induced genocide are afraid of paying the consequences for their actions.
No amount of paid trolls will counteract the effects the truth is having on the global population:
We were lied to…over and over again.
The virus was man-made.
Ivermectin and HCQ were effective against it.
The “vax” is dangerous and is only appropriate for the fat and old.
Companies got filthy rich on the backs of dead Americans and dead people of the world.
Its easy to mark them off as natural causes. Drug company walks away counting its profits.
And that’s all greg is pushing…more obfuscation, relativism, and just plain cowardice in the face of these assholes getting caught.
So address the points I raised.
I won’t hold my breath. That never happens around here.
No, let’s address all the crap you wrote about how people were nothing but low-life scum if they refused to take the jab for the good of the world all the while lying Fauci was telling us the jab would prevent us from getting the Kung Flu.
How about addressing the lies you promoted?
And our civic duty to be part of the gigantic depopulation experiment.
See what I mean?
Comrade Greggie, I have been aware of your tactics for years.
First, you make statements (letting your mouth overload your a$$, so to speak) on an issue, but when questioned about it or asked to back up your claims, you glibly either toddle off to another thread or you respond with some idiotic response like “See what I mean?” which simply means “Sorry, won’t answer that. I let my mouth overload my a$$.”
Being a pathetic idiot is no way for you to go through life, but alas, you seem to enjoy being dumber than the court jester.
You need a hat that says “Trolling for Trump”.
Now how did we know that the Trump that lives rent free in your head would pop up?
Because Comrade Greggie doesn’t have the intellect to come up with anything else, Kitt.
Greg you still have yet to tell me how many departments are there in the government its been years you have never answered.
But to your point what exactly did you ask I got lost in the cut and paste bullshit.
You addressed nothing.
In none of that subjective, mostly fluff drivel to you address anything at all.
Your strange obsession with #1 and your subsequent ranting about it prove the point, as you continue to say nothing and mean nothing in the rest of your diatribe.
You’re obscuring and blowing smoke. Not going to work.
What happened to Damar Hamlin? Why won’t the hospital confirm what caused him to collapse and why does Hamlin have to keep quiet?
Map showing how many per 100,000 came down with covid.
Note AFRICA.
Much of Africa uses ivermectin to prevent parasitic infections common there.
The vaccination rate of covid there is low.
So, what protected all these millions of people?
Ivermectin works.
Ivermectin works, and the those who withheld it are guilty of crimes against humanity.
The real mass murders WEF, UN, CFR, China, Russia, Liberal Democrats(Like Biden)and Pfizer