Feds Say They’ve Arrested ‘Innocence Of Muslims’ Film Producer Nakoula

Spread the love

Loading

Nikki Finke @ Deadline:

BREAKING… There is a courtroom proceeding this afternoon in the Roybal Federal Building in Downtown LA regarding what the feds are saying is the arrest of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, reputed filmmaker of the anti-Islam filmInnocence of Muslims which has sparked rioting, violence, and deaths in 30 countries in the Mideast, Europe, and Asia since 9/11. An initial appearance in USA v. Nakoula, 09-cr-00617-CAS, has been scheduled on or after 3:00 PM today. Nakoula was arrested for violating terms of his probation and is set for an initial appearance before U.S. District Judge Christina Snyder, who sentenced him in June 2009 following a bank fraud conviction. Federal officials were looking into whether Nakoula violated his probation in that case by uploading the crude film’s 14-minute trailer onto the Internet. He and his family have been in hiding since he was voluntarily interviewed by federal authorities and has since put up for sale his Cerritos home where some of the video was shot. Nakoula served 21 months in prison on 2009 federal bank fraud and aggravated identity theft charges and a $795K fine. He now could face more prison time if it is determined his involvement in the film was a violation of his probation, which barred him from either owning or using devices with access to the Web for five years without prior approval from his probation officer. Earlier, when LA County sheriffs escorted him to a police station for FBI questioning, Nakoula left his family’s Cerritos home with his head wrapped in a towel to hide his identity.

His arrest today is an apparent U.S. attempt to appease worldwide Muslims and their clerics and governments demanding for the YouTube video to be removed and its filmmaker punished. In an address on Tuesday condemning the content of the video, President Obama explained, “The strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech.” This legal action is a way to preserve America’s  First Amendment principles but at the same time find a roundabout but legitimate way to punish Bakoula for the crudely made film that portrays the Muhammad as a religious fraud, womanizer and pedophile.

In most federal cases alleging probation violations, the probation officer submits a confidential report to the sentencing judge who has the option of holding a probation revocation hearing. Then Snyder can send the defendant to prison or impose additional terms of probation without jail time. But first theprobation violation has to be proven, and Steven Seiden is Nakoula’s defense attorney in this matter. Nakoula may argue that he’s being singled out on a probation technicality for exercising his right to free speech.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Bakoula portrayed the Muhammad as a religious fraud, womanizer and pedophile?
OR, the Hadith portrayed the Muhammad as a religious fraud, womanizer and pedophile.

Mohammad was a religious fraud:

Tabari 6:107 “Satan Cast a False Qur’an Revelation on the Messenger of Allah’s Tongue.”

These verses Mohammad wrote but later said Satan inspired are the very same verses Salmon Rushdie based his book, The Satanic Verses, on. But Mohammad is the one who admitted he allows demons to inspire his verses, not Rushdie….or Bakoula!

Mohammad was a womanizer:

Book 039, Number 6759:
A’isha the wife of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him), reported that one day Allah’s Messenger (Mohammad) (may peace be upon him) came out of her (apartment) during the night and she felt jealous.
Then he came and he saw me (in what agitated state of mind) I was.
He said: A’isha, what has happened to you?
Do you feel jealous?
Thereupon she said: How can it be (that a woman like me) should NOT feel jealous in regard to a husband like you.
Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: It was your devil who had come to you, and she said: Allah’s Mes- senger, is there along with me a devil?
He said: Yes.
I said: Is devil attached to everyone?
He said: Yes.
I (Aisha) again said: Allah’s Messenger, is it with you also?
He said: Yes, but my Lord has helped me against him and as such I am absolutely safe from his mischief.

At the time of Aisha having this conversation with Mohammad he had 9 other wives and numerous concubines and was still out looking for sex with more women.

Tabari IX:139 – “You are a self-respecting girl, but the prophet is a womanizer.” Words spoken by the disappointed parents of a girl who had ‘offered’ herself to Muhammad (he accepted).

Mohammad was a pedophile:

Muslim (8:3309) – Muhammad consummated his marriage to Aisha when she was only nine. (See also Bukhari 58:234 and many other places).
Bukhari (62:18) – Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.
Muslim (8:3311) – The girl took her dolls with her to Muhammad’s house (something to play with when the “prophet” was not having sex with her).

Ugh!

Obama proudly appointed a man to a post partly because he was a “Hafiz.”*
*A Hafiz is a person who has memorized the entire Koran.
Rashad Hussain (born in 1978), is an American attorney, and U.S. Special Envoy to the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), an intergovernmental group with 57 member states.
Obama:

As an accomplished lawyer and a close and trusted member of my White House staff, Rashad has played a key role in developing the partnerships I called for in Cairo. And as a Hafiz of the Quran, he is a respected member of the American Muslim community….

But it must be noted that while many Muslim men do that, very few have memorized OR EVEN READ the Hadith!
And it is in the Hadith where we really learn about Mohammad.

I’m not sure what the purpose of publishing this article. Is it to suggest that the government wishes to penalize someone who produces an anti-Muslim film? Is it too suggest that this man should not be penalized for breaking his probation? Is it intended to make him sort of a folk hero—breaking the law in response to Islamofascism?

Liberal1[objectivity]
is it because the FEDS OBAMA, WANT TO SEND A MESSAGE TO THE MUSLIMS
THAT HE HAS GIVEN A FORMAL ORDER TO GET THE ONE THE MUSLIMS WANT TO BE PUNISH,
BUT TO ESCAPE THE ANGER FROM THE AMERICANS HE HAS FOUND A COVER UP TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A BREACH OF A PREVIOUS ORDER.
IT’S as clear as stain crystal and as transparent as as the the scent of the perfume a skunk
sprayed upon you,

@Liberal1 (Objectivity): Let me help you because you are so stupid. He is in jail because 0-blama wants him there for political gain. Any other excuse is just pure stupidity.

No Ms. Bees. The only message that is being sent is that a shady character cannot be arbitrarily breaking his probation terms and getting away with it, as is our laws. Apparently, the penchant this man has for fake and multiple names never ends since, at his formal arrest yesterday, he gave yet another name to his every growing list.

The man is not to be trusted, and I’m pleased to see that even Shoebat Walid is agreeing with me that Bacile/Nakoula/Youssef may actually be a terrorist himself, and not some “innocent” 5th rate “filmmaker”, bilking people for a shoddy South Park production for cash.

Unfortunately, Bacile/Nakoula/Youssef can only be held in jail for his probation violations technically. However I hope that our intelligence investigations are working to find out if this film was a perk/assist to the Sept 11th terror attacks while he’s incarcerated.

MATA
hi,
it would be interesting to know what is his aim for having made that movie,
and you might have answered my question,
when you mention why on 9/11,
he might have more than one answer to it,
and still he had the first amendment on his side, no matter his probation,
do you think so?
thank you for the explanation, I find it interesting that he took a chance
to breach the probation, of no web , for that movie he must have known the consequences of it,
but not as big as expected, but he did it way before 9/11
you know when it happen, I came to think back of our exchange with mossomo, and when we think of it,
we where almost predicting that awful human
explosion to happen, it’s weird sometimes is in it? how things happen,
bye

Ms. Bees: ….and still he had the first amendment on his side, no matter his probation, do you think so?

Multiple answers to this, Bees.

If he were just expressing dislike for Islam and/or Mohammed… with no other underlying reason… he has the right to make a really bad movie.

Where he broke the law was using false names and using the Internet to upload the film without approval from his Probation officer. This is because his financial fraud crime, for which he was convicted, was accomplished by using false names and the Internet.

However the First Amendment does not allow for using free speech for malicious intent and to incite criminal behavior. So if he created this for the terrorists as part of a plot to cause chaos and incite attacks against US interest overseas, he has no safe haven in the First Amendment.

MATA
changing subject; I just learn there are fake gold bar sold in NEW YORK,
REALLY LOOK ALIKE.
BYE

MATA
YES, BUT MANY ARE DOING IT TO EXPRESS ANGER AT THEM, ARE WE GOING TO HAVE TO RESTRAIN OUR URGE TO KILL THEM WITH WORDS, FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO US,
THEY HAVE KILLED OVER 6 THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS ON THE FIRST 9/11, ARE WE TO TURN THE OTHER CHEEK ON THIS 9/11 AND PRETEND LIKE OBAMA, IT’S JUST A BUMP ON THE ROAD,
AND WHAT MAKE OBAMA SO SURE THEY WILL CHANGE, IT’S ONLY HIM AND WHO HE CONVINCED
WHO BELIEVE IT, NOBODY DOES. SO THAT FILM IS ONE OF OTHERS IN DIFFERENT FORMATS,
ON DIFFERENT PLACES, ON DIFFERENT TIMES, BECAUSE NO AMERICAN WILL FORGET AND FORGIVE THEM, TO HAVE DONE WRONG TO PEACEFUL MEN IN THERE,
THEY SOW HATE, THEY WILL HARVEST HATE FOREVER,
I know this man has broken the law, but they did not bother him before that mob killers began to kill
and dessecrate and kill good humans in high positions , and those killed
out of pure evil they posses , passed on ,since multiple generations, of killing other.
AMERICA FOR AMERICANS, THE BLOOD OF OUR BRAVES CRY OUT, IT
MUST BE PAID FOR THEIR OUTRAGE, THEY ARE THE KILLERS NOT THE FILM.
THEY MUST TAKE RESPONSABILITY OF THEIR ACTIONS,
IT’S NOT FOR AMERICA TO CHANGE HIS CONSTITUTION AND AMENDMENTS TO PLEASE THE ENEMIES.

@MataHarley:

Just to play devil’s advocate, they do have to prove that he violated his parole. If he had a second party manage a Youtube website for him and they uploaded the trailer it may or may not violate his parole depending on the court’s wording. (I like you suspect that he may be in cahoots with terrorists, and that he at least violated the spirit of the court’s order, but that’s for the court to decide.)

Don’t disagree with that in the slightest, Ditto. Evidently Bacile/Nakoula/Youssef has had his bail revoked, and held in custody pending his hearing, likely due to the fact that when he showed up for a hearing, he used yet another name… Mark Basseley Youssef. Says it was legally changed to that in 2002, yet he was tried and convicted circa 2007 under the name of Nakoula. Apparently, this guy can’t stick to one name.

Ditto
hi,
I did read he is a COPTIC EGYPTIAN, AND THEY ARE BEING TORTURE AND KILLED
BY THE MUSLIM, EVEN CRUCIFIED NOT LONG AGO BY THE MOB,
I REMEMBER READING IT,
SO THAT COULD BE THE REASON WHY HE DID THE MOVIE,
EVEN IF HE HAD TO PUT HIMSELF IN TROUBLE,
WHEN YOU HEAR THAT HORRIBLE THING DONE TO YOUR OWN RELIGION,
IT TRIGGER A REVENGE POWER TO EXPOSE THE MUSLIMS CRUELTY
IN A WAY WHERE THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CAPTURE THEIR REAL FACES AND
SO CALLED PEACEFUL RELIGION.
BESIDE, I don’t think I am wrong by saying the fact that he is AMERICAN STILL PUT HIM UNDER THE PROTECTION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT,
AND HE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OBAMA LEANING TOWARD THE PROTECTION OF MUSLIMS INSTEAD OF STANDING BY AMERICA’S LAWS NO MATTER WHO IS THE AMERICAN, THE FACTS IS THAT HE AS THE PRESIDENT OF AMERICA IS SUPPOSE TO PROTECT ALL AMERICANS,
AND TAKE THEIR SIDES,
I find it strange that they arrest him only after the
MUSLIMS display of their murders,
AND NOT HAVE BEEN BOTHER IN JUNE BY THE RELEASE OF THE FILM, IT’S TELLING, THEY TRY TO GET AWAY FROM ACCUSING OBAMA WHO FAIL TO DO HIS JOB TO ACCUSE THE MUSLIMS OF TERRORIST ACTIONS AGAINST AMERICA AGAIN ON 9/11,
FOR HIM IT’S JUST A BUMP IN THE ROAD,
THE FACT IS THEY ARE STARTING TO WANT TO LIMIT THE RIGHT TO SPEAK OF ALL AMERICANS,
WHO’S PUNISHING WHO?
think about the blogs, they allow the enemies to have blogs spitting their hates, why do they let them free

@ilovebeeswarzone:

Honestly Bees, we don’t really know if he is a Coptic. This man is a congenital liar and con-man so you can’t take anything he says at face value. He claims that he has Coptic family members in Egypt, but he has also claimed to be an Israeli and to have had hundreds of Jews who financed the project. He completely misrepresented to the actors and crew what the film was about and, according to these people, his shooting script had nothing whatsoever to do with Islam or Mohammad. (Although I would think that his asking them to say the name “Mohammad” and other Islam related words in vocal recording sessions should have raised warning flags, you can’t blame the performers for their naivety in trusting their director.)

Ditto
I WOULD NOT BLAME THE PERFORMERS, HOPE THAT ANYTHING I SAID made you believe that,
I don’t blame the movie, I did not see it, and I’m not interested to see it.
I know of NAKULA from what I read,
it’s just the first amendment which interest me, that I feel he deserve to be protected, him more than the pass given to those who cannot control themselves, they are killers, and they are the one to pay for their crimes,
not turning the guilt back to AN AMERICAN,
bye

@ilovebeeswarzone:

I know you don’t blame the actors or crew Bees. And I share your concern about the first amendment. I’m not at all interested in the film either. I’ve had to sit through enough of such films in college film classes, and I assure you they are not a genre that I support. The making of a nation They do however have a curiosity value into the mindset of bigotry and propaganda.

The main thing that I want you to understand about this filmmaker, is that he is a con-artist. And that he is a rabble rouser. Typically, all they care about is getting their scam going. They have no ethics whatsoever. Such smear films are designed to infuriate their chosen target and induce violence. The question is what is the real orientation of the producer. He first claimed to be an Israeli, then he claimed to be a Coptic Christian. but you can never trust that he is giving you the truth. It is entirely possible that is a radical Islamist agent of the Muslim Brotherhood. creating a video that disparages their own religious, so that they can blame it on their enemies.

Traditionally, an agent provocateur (plural: agents provocateurs, French for “inciting agent(s)”) is an agent employed by the police or other entity to act undercover to entice or provoke another person to commit an illegal act. More generally, the term may refer to a person or group that seeks to discredit or harm another by provoking them to commit a wrong or rash action.

Ditto
hi,
yes and how do we deal with him to find his intent?
how about having him agree to a deep sleep memory probe, which would
lead to this only part of his memory, beginning way ahead of his actions but further far down,
to the idea forming in his mind, I call it the birth of his idea , which lead him to the action itself.
I have read about those probes and I think it could be done, even in more than one session,
I suppose he could be made to agree by convincing him of his own interest to find out what made him do it, and what make him lie so much,
that would benefit also the OTHER LIARS ELECTED TO POSITION OF HIGH POWER, BEFORE THEY ARE ELECTED TO PREVENT THEIR LIES TO REACH THAT POWER AND DAMAGE THE AMERICANS,
A VERY WORTHY CAUSE TO HAVE IT DONE BY SECURITY EXPERTS, TO PROTECT THE NATION, FROM IMPOSTERS
SEEKING TO DESTROY AMERICA, FROM WHAT WE ARE SEEING NOW GOVERNING THIS NATION WITH A TOTAL IMPOSITION OF POWER WHICH IS GROWING AS WE SPEAK, AND GOD SAVE AMERICA IF HE IS GIVEN A SECOND TERM. WHICH THAT PROBE WOULD PREVENT
IF THEY ARE FOUND TO BE LIARS BEFORE,
THANK YOU FOR YOUR VERY IMPORTANT INFO,
BYE

Ditto
more thoughts on it, is that the AMERICANS MANY OF THEM LEARNED TO NOT TRUST
ANY ELECTED WITH THE MEDIAS PROPAGANDA EFFORT TO SELL THOSE WHO SURELY PAID
THEM WELL, AS A WHOLE PARTY OF DEMOCRATS BENEFIT FROM IT, THEY ARE ALL RICH AND CAN AFFORD TO CHIP IN THE COST,
BUT THEIR LIES ARE SHOCKING MANY AMERICANS, WHO HAVE BECAME DES-ILLUSION AND PUT THEM ALL IN THE SAME BAG, LOOK AT OBAMA DEMONIZING THE CONGRESS SO MUCH THAT THE PEOPLE CAME TO SHUN THE CONGRESS AND THE POLLS PUT THE CONGRESS TO THE LOWEST NUMBER EVER MADE, BECAUSE OBAMA BLAMING THEM FOR HIS FAILURE,
BUT THE ONE WHO MAINTAIN THEIR CREDIBILITY ARE THE MILITARY, AND THE FBI,
SO IF ONE OF THEM WHICH HAS VETTED THE PRESIDENT WOULD COME IN WITH HIS RESULT OF WHAT THE MAN IS TRULY IN HIS DEEP INTENT, WOULD MAKE AMERICAN DISENFRANCHISE WITH THE WORDS OF THE PRESIDENT IF SHOWN LIES AND NEFARIOUS INTENT TOWARD AMERICA,
AND THEN THE LEAST INFORMED WOULD BE SURE OF WHAT IS TOLD ABOUT THE MAN
SEEKING THE HIGHEST POSITION A SECOND TIME, COMING FROM HIGH CREDIBLE SOURCE,
WHICH AMERICA STILL BELIEVED, AND IT WOULD CARRY THE WEIGHT IT NEED TO CONVINCE AMERICAN WHICH THEY SHOULD VOTE FOR,
SOME HIGH COMMANDERS AND CIA HIGH KNOWLEDGEBLE ARE WARNING THE PEOPLE AT THIS TIME AND SHOULD BE HAVING THE WEIGHT OF THEIR WORDS AS TRUTH MORE
THAN ANYONE ELSE.