Fauci: I’ve Been Lying To You About Herd Immunity

Spread the love

Loading


 
by ALLAHPUNDIT

I can’t remember the last time I heard a public official, especially a highly influential public official, admit to deceiving the public.

No, wait. Now that I think about it, I do remember.

It was … Anthony Fauci, back in June, admitting that Americans were deliberately given bum advice about masks early on in order to preserve the extant supply for medical professionals.



So, why weren’t we told to wear masks in the beginning?

“Well, the reason for that is that we were concerned the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply. And we wanted to make sure that the people namely, the health care workers, who were brave enough to put themselves in a harm way, to take care of people who you know were infected with the coronavirus and the danger of them getting infected.”

Recently the Times noticed that his estimate of how much of the population will need to be vaccinated before herd immunity sets in has begun to shift. Early on he said it’d be 60-70 percent. Lately he’s been saying “75, 80, 85 percent” or “75 to 80-plus percent.” Was he just being sloppy before or had something in the science changed since his initial estimate?

There’s been some new data, Fauci said. But also, he’s been lying all along:

In a telephone interview the next day, Dr. Fauci acknowledged that he had slowly but deliberately been moving the goal posts. He is doing so, he said, partly based on new science, and partly on his gut feeling that the country is finally ready to hear what he really thinks.

Hard as it may be to hear, he said, he believes that it may take close to 90 percent immunity to bring the virus to a halt — almost as much as is needed to stop a measles outbreak…

“When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent,” Dr. Fauci said. “Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I thought, ‘I can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85.”

The last person in government who should be lying to the public about anything is the lead spokesman for a national pandemic response, especially with a mass vaccination effort under way. Compliance with prevention measures requires trust — trust that onerous social-distancing rules are just and effective, trust that the vaccine is safe, trust that authorities are leveling with you about the risk and how soon the pandemic might end if follow the guidance. That’s why we all freak out when the likes of Gavin Newsom is caught dining out in defiance of his own COVID hygiene protocols. It’s not just that it makes him look like a hypocritical choad, it’s that people are destined to conclude from his behavior that gathering is less risky than it actually is.

Trust is essential. At least twice now, Fauci has given Americans good reason not to trust him by misleading them and then copping to it.

Reading the passage above, I thought back to his clashes with Rand Paul during Senate testimony this year. Paul warned Fauci that he may be an expert but his word isn’t law; elected officials write the rules for their constituents, not scientific bureaucrats. That’s correct, said Fauci. I’m a scientist, so my job is simply to give you the hard scientific truth and let you take it from there.

Except he hasn’t done that. He’s hidden the hard scientific truth in order to shape public opinion — twice, at least. He’s playing PR guy when, of all people in government, he should be dealing exclusively in facts and letting the chips fall where they may.

We’re left with an inescapable question: Was he lying about herd immunity before or is he lying now? I don’t grasp the logic of lying to Americans about this earlier. Whether herd immunity sets in at 60-70 percent or 75-85 percent, the takeaway for the average joe is that most of us will need to get the jab in order to squash the virus. The point of lying, I assume, was to give the public false hope that the path to pre-pandemic normalcy was a bit shorter than it actually is, but for most of us the difference between a 70 percent immunity threshold and an 85 percent threshold is meaningless. The bottom line is that a great majority of the population will have to be vaccinated before it’s party time and thus we all need to do our part.

So why lie? Why be cute about the numbers? If anything, I’m led to wonder whether Fauci is lying now by artificially inflating the number needed for immunity because he thinks raising the bar might encourage fencesitters to bite the bullet and get the vaccine. Now that we know that he’s practicing social engineering via deceptive public comments, everything he says can be questioned in those terms.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I will never believe Bill Gates sock puppet Faux xi, not one word. Nor the technocrats that talk about new strains to increase grant money.
The VP should have booted the old liar looong ago from the task force.
He even lies to children about jabbing Santa Clause much to the delight of the MFM.
Not Santa is magical therefore immune he cant even catch a cold.
HCQ, masks, ivermectin, now the vaxx.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/french-infectious-disease-expert-shocked-by-the-number-of-adverse-reactions-to-covid-19-vaccine
But ABC comes in to cover with mockingbird BS
https://abc7news.com/covid-19-vaccine-reactions-moderna-vs-pfizer-what-are-the-side-effects-of/8805958/
The lab rats are waiting til the human trials are over.

Hey, lay off the doc. He is simply practicing LIBERAL science. That is “science” that is flexible and malleable to suit the liberal agenda. Obama burned through all the masks and didn’t bother replacing them, so masks aren’t important… until we have enough. Then, wear them or you’re an asshole. Herd immunity can be lower until we have the means to attain it and stand down a bit… then the threshold needs to be raised, and raised again.

Liberal “science”. It’s what you make of it.

The problem with Fauci’s explanation is all on the receiving end, where some people hear only what they want to hear rather than what’s actually being said.

@Greg: No, the problem for YOU is that we actually pay attention to and remember what we hear.

Dr. Fauci hasn’t attempted to deceive anyone. It has been his misfortune to find himself having to work around an executive administration that has attempted to do so constantly. He’s done a very good job of that, much to the benefit of the American people. The man is a dedicated and highly competent public servant, not a politician.

By the way, I’m declaring my own political Christmas truce. Here’s a musical meeting of the ancient and the modern. Merry Christmas, everyone. I hope we all have a better year in 2021.

Merry Christmas to everyone! Be of good cheer

Ironic how the Left excuses Fauci because he is one of their own.
But when President Trump told Bob Woodward about how he’d merely downplayed covid at the start, he was reamed!
Love that both Fauci and scarf-lady have been caught in big hypocrisy lately.
At least she quit over hers.
At 84 you’d think he was old enough to be forcibly retired, but apparently not.

“Coronavirus lived on surfaces until it didn’t.

Masks didn’t work until they did, then they did not.

There is asymptomatic transmission, except there isn’t.

Lockdowns work to control the virus except they do not.

All these people are sick without symptoms until, whoops, PCR tests are wildly inaccurate because they were never intended to be diagnostic tools.
So we will gather for Christmas and New Years as we have in years past. Feast and raise a glass to another year gone by with hopes we all of us gather again next year.
Merriest Christmas Ever to all.