A former State Department official told the Senate Intelligence Committee he destroyed records in January 2017 at the request of former British spy Christopher Steele, according to a report released on Tuesday.
Jonathan Winer, who served as special envoy to Libya through early 2017, was Steele’s contact at the State Department. He arranged a meeting for Steele in October 2016 with another State Department official at Foggy Bottom to share findings from a dossier of research he had compiled on Donald Trump.
The Senate Intelligence Committee interviewed Winer twice about his contacts with Steele and his handling of the dossier, on July 10, 2017 and April 18, 2018.
According to the Senate report, Winer disclosed that he destroyed reports that Steele had sent him over the years. The Senate report also says that Winer failed to reveal when asked in his first interview with the committee that he had arranged the meeting for Steele at the State Department months earlier.
“After Steele’s memos were published in the press in January 2017, Steele asked Winer to make note of having them, then either destroy all the earlier reports Steele had sent the Department of State or return them to Steele, out of concern that someone would be able to reconstruct his source network,” the Senate report says.
The report quotes Winer saying: “So I destroyed them, and I basically destroyed all the correspondence I had with him.”
Steele appeared to be on a deletion spree at the time he made his request that Winer scrub his records.
The former MI6 officer told a British court in March that he “wiped” all of his correspondence related to the dossier in December 2016 and January 2017. He said he had no records of communications with his primary dossier source, who has been identified as Igor Danchenko.
Steele, a former MI6 officer who owns a private intelligence firm in London, provided Winer with more than 100 intelligence reports from 2014 through 2016.
Emails that The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit show that Winer shared Steele’s reports with a small group of State Department officials. The Senate report says that the State Department was able to provide the committee with Steele’s reports from 2015 and 2016, though most from 2014 are missing.
It is unclear if Winer violated any State Department regulations regarding the handling of government records.
Republican lawmakers have long been interested in Winer because of his interactions with Steele and his handling of the dossier. The Senate report offered a scathing assessment of the dossier, which the FBI used to obtain warrants to surveil former Trump aide Carter Page.
The report said that Steele displayed “poor” tradecraft. It also said that Steele “repeatedly” refused the committee’s requests for interviews.
Winer, who was a longtime aide to former Sec. of State John Kerry, was in contact with the founders of Fusion GPS, the firm that hired Steele. Winer also served as a background source for two reporters, Michael Isikoff and David Corn, for stories they wrote before the November 2016 election touting Steele’s allegations.
Winer also disseminated an anti-Trump dossier peddled by two Clinton-linked operatives, Cody Shearer and Sidney Blumenthal. Winer told the Senate committee that he provided Steele with memos that Shearer wrote about Trump. Steele in turn shared the documents with the FBI to lend support to his own theories about Trump.
The Senate report suggests that Winer withheld some details about his links to Steele from both the committee and the State Department.
Strikes me as a crime
Official documents of the US Government protection for government documents and records is provided by 18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. To bad Nancy Reagan wasnt there she would have told him to just say no..
No wonder they call it Foggy bottom, Trump calls it the DeepState Dept. Im sure these policies of do as you will and F’ the law were a Kissinger leftover from the 70s.
Um… isn’t that perjury?
@DrJohn: Yeah, it’s a crime. Like Hillary’s 33,000 emails or the documents Sandy Berger stuffed in his underwear, individuals don’t get to decide what the people get to know; laws do. Democrats care nothing about laws.