Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover Bears Delicious Fruit as Woketivist Freakout Commences

Spread the love

Loading

By Sister Toldjah

As we reported Monday, the wahmbulances were on standby for panicked Twitter leftists, “journalists,” and Twitter employees alike (but I repeat myself) after news broke that the social media platform had “entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by an entity wholly owned by Elon Musk, for $54.20 per share in cash in a transaction valued at approximately $44 billion.”
 
Prior to the press release issued by Twitter confirming that the “definitive agreement” was in the works, certain prominent “woketivists” were issuing frantic calls to action of sorts to their fellow wokesters warning, without evidence, that a Musk takeover supposedly would ensure that “white nationalism” would reign supreme on the platform.
 
Among them was Shaun King, a self-styled “racial justice warrior” who some left-wing activists say has been pretending for years to be a black man.
 
King took to the Twitter machine Monday to go on a bizarre, virtue-signaling tantrum where he alleged, among other things he wrote in a multi-tweet rant, that Musk’s desire to run Twitter was “about white power.”
 
“At its root, @ElonMusk wanting to purchase Twitter is not about left vs right. It’s about white power,” King proclaimed. “The man was raised in Apartheid by a white nationalist. He’s upset that Twitter won’t allow white nationalists to target/harass people. That’s his definition of free speech.”
 
Apparently, King was so fauxfended by the news of Musk’s impending takeover that at some point he either deleted or deactivated his Twitter account:
 


 
The revelation prompted many, including Donald Trump, Jr. to declare that King’s actions made Musk’s purchase worth it:
 


 
In addition to allegations of fraud and accusations that he’s appropriated black culture by masquerading as a black man, King is also known for using his Twitter platform to defame people. King even once falsely accused a Houston-area man of murdering a black girl. The man later killed himself.
 
[the_ad id=”157875″]
 
As I was writing this, King’s account began appearing active again. He is now claiming in expletive-filled tweets to his critics that he had to make his account more “secure” after allegedly “getting death threats and hack attempts.”
 
Considering his past full of well-documented lies, color me skeptical. King is known for his attention-grabbing ploys, so much so that he’s earned a lot of not-so-flattering nicknames – including from some of his so-called allies on the left:
 
https://twitter.com/clockoutwars/status/1518614826049851395?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1518614826049851395%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fsister-toldjah%2F2022%2F04%2F26%2Felon-musks-twitter-takeover-bears-delicious-fruit-as-woketivist-freakout-commences-n556164
 
What’s likely the case here is that he and other professional outrage mobsters on the left are conflicted about whether to stay or go from Twitter. That people who cause more harm than good on social media are mulling whether to stick around is a good thing, and is solid evidence that Musk’s actions are already bearing delicious fruit.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I just can’t wait for more tweets like this…

FROxmprXEAEvjg1.jpg

Well, he’s a pole-smoking hienie-miner, so what do we expect?

This couldn’t be more hilarious. Musk is buying Twitter to end censorship. However, I doubt if he cares if these stupid, racist, hateful, anti-American, crybaby leftists censor THEMSELVES. Could they be more stupid?

I guess if they can’t be the ones to censor the thoughts of others, they’ll censor themselves. They can’t live without censorship. Their brains no longer understands to concept of a competition of ideas; in their world, only suppressing ideas is acceptable. If they had superior ideas or had any confidence in their ideas, they would be ecstatic about the opportunity to destroy conservative ideas with their leftist utopia.

But they run from discussion like cowards because they know they fall short.

Let the torture begin
comment image

Last edited 2 years ago by kitt

Oh yeah pile on the moderators are most likely in tears.
comment image

Fantastic.

comment image

Knowles is awesome.

Shaun King benefitted from the unity of Twitter’s ideological slant.
For years he never saw one person tell him, remind him, he was a white man pretending to be black.
But such diversity at Twitter is ending./sarc off.
Here’s Twitter on the spectrum of political donations.comment image

Now that Elon Musk owns Twitter, MSNBC is all of a sudden worried that the platform can be manipulated for political reasons
Now that Elon Musk owns Twitter, MSNBC is all of a sudden worried that the platform can be manipulated for political reasons (rumble.com)

Haven’t they been telling us that it’s OK when a privately owned company does that?

It just dawned on me that liberals are suffering a huge double-whammy. They have simultaneously lost one of their climate gods AND a major source of censorship/propaganda.

Can we all be sad and sympathetic together?

05/13/22 – Elon Musk says Twitter deal on hold pending details on fake accounts; shares sink 8%

Elon Musk announced Friday that his Twitter deal is on hold until he receives more information about how many fake accounts there are on the social media platform.

In a follow-up tweet around two hours later, Musk added that he was “still committed to the acquisition.”

Twitter’s stock plummeted 18% in premarket trading following the initial announcement, but trimmed some losses after the second tweet. Shares were down about 8% by 11:28 a.m. ET. A spokesperson for the social media company did not immediately respond to a CNBC request for

$44 billion is a lot to pay for the technological equivalent of bathroom stall partition for trolls to write on.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

Actually, TEXAS REPUBLICANS just killed the Elon Musk purchase, and possibly Twitter as well:

05/13/22 – Texas has declared open season on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube with censorship law

Texas’s law makes it illegal for any social media platform with 50 million or more US monthly users to “block, ban, remove, deplatform, demonetize, de-boost, restrict, deny equal access or visibility to, or otherwise discriminate against expression.”

The law creates enormous uncertainty about how social media will actually function in Texas, according to legal experts, and raises questions about what users’ online spaces may look like and what content they may find there, if the companies are even able to run their services at all.

How would this kill the Elon Musk deal? Because of what Musk is “exactly aligned” with:

05/09/22 – Elon Musk says he is ‘exactly aligned’ with Europe’s sweeping new rules for social media platforms

Elon Musk appeared to endorse a key European law regulating social media on Monday when he appeared in a video with Thierry Breton, a top EU commissioner and digital regulator.

In the video, Breton said he met with Musk to explain the finer points of the Digital Services Act, a forthcoming law that imposes higher content moderation standards on tech platforms.

Asked by Breton whether he felt the DSA “fits pretty well” with how Musk believes platforms should be run, the billionaire Tesla (TSLA) CEO and prospective owner of Twitter said it is “exactly aligned with [what] we’re thinking.”

“Very much agree with — it’s been a great discussion and I really think that — I agree with everything you said, really, I think we’re very much of the same mind and, you know, just anything that my companies can do that would be beneficial to Europe, we want do that,” Musk said in the video.

What about the right of owners to control how their own property is used? Texas Anti-Censorship Law Targets Meta (FB), Alphabet (GOOGL), Twitter (TWTR)

The Texas law makes it illegal for any social media platform with 50 million or more monthly users in the United States to “block, ban, remove, deplatform, demonetize, de-boost, restrict, deny equal access or visibility to, or otherwise discriminate against expression.”

Will it now be OK for pornographers to post whatever they want, and sue if they’re not allowed to do so?