Electric Vehicles: Volt Farce

Spread the love

Loading

by ANDREW STUTTAFORD

Central planners have a way of brushing unpleasant and inconvenient questions away without bothering to come to an answer. Those promoting electric vehicles (EVs) are no exception. One of those awkward questions concerns how already shaky electricity grids, undermined by the decarbonization process, are going to cope with the extra demand that will come with EVs.

In an article for Cal Matters published before the administration’s recent announcement of the way that the EPA would be used to “encourage” consumers to buy EVs, Nadia Lopez examined exactly that question:

Under a groundbreaking new state regulation, 35% of new 2026 car models sold in California must be zero-emissions, ramping up to 100% in 2035. Powering these vehicles and electrifying other sectors of the economy means the state must triple its power generation capacity and deploy new solar and wind energy at almost five times the pace of the past decade . . .

At the same time as electrifying cars and trucks, California must, under state law, shift all of its power to renewables by 2045. Adding even more pressure, the state’s last nuclear power plant, Diablo Canyon, is slated to shut down in 2030 . . .

Wait, there’s more. Lopez explains that, to provide enough electricity to meet total demand, California must (my emphasis added):

Convince drivers to charge their cars during off-peak hours: With new discounted rates, utilities are urging residents to avoid charging their cars between 4 p.m. and 9 p.m. But many people don’t have unrestricted access to chargers at their jobs or homes.

Build solar and wind at an unprecedented pace: Shifting to all renewables requires at least 6 gigawatts of new resources a year for the next 25 years — a pace that’s never been met before.

Develop a giant new industry: State officials predict that offshore wind farms will provide enough power for about 1.5 million homes by 2030 and 25 million homes by 2045. But no such projects are in the works yet. Planning them, obtaining an array of permits and construction could take at least seven to eight years.

Build 15 times more public chargers: About 1.2 million chargers will be needed for the 8 million electric cars expected in California by 2030. Currently, about 80,000 public chargers operate statewide, with another estimated 17,000 on the way, according to state data.

Expand vehicle-to-grid technology: State officials hope electric cars will send energy back to the grid when electricity is in high demand, but the technology is new and has not been tested in electric cars.

Increase electricity production by up to 42% in 2035 and, under a recent scenario, as much as 85% in 2045, according to California Energy Commission estimates. Generation capacity — the maximum that must be installed to meet demand throughout a given year  — would need to triple by 2045.

I am, I admit it, something of a pessimist, but when central planners are involved — and have no doubt, that’s what’s going on here — pessimism is the appropriate frame of mind.

Looking out from California to the U.S. as a whole, here’s Utility Drive (April 11) on grid interconnection:

The total capacity of energy projects in U.S. interconnection queues grew 40% year-over-year in 2022, with more than 1,350 GW of generation and 680 GW of storage waiting for approval to connect, according to a new report from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Queue wait times are increasing as the number of projects getting in line has grown.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

There’s not going to be any money to create all those needed infrastructure improvements, tho.

Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric, and San Diego Gas & Electric are now planning for a flat-rate charge based on income.”

Not a flat-rate charge, period, but one based on how much money you make.

Under the proposal, it would cost as little as $15 a month for low-income households and up to $85 more per month for households making more than $180,000 a year.

Marxists never realize that they will be incentivizing being a low-income household and penalizing those making more than $180,000 a year.

They will thus get more low-income households and fewer that make more than $180,000 a year. The old Marxist adage, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” rewards having a need, but not having an ability: those who produce are essentially made the slaves of those who do not.

No one loves being a slave, so they will move away.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2023/04/16/california-goes-full-communist-utilities-to-base-what-they-charge-on-how-much-you-make-n1687622

The left makes policy based on the belief that everyone will simply submit, not seek their own salvation. They are incapable of thinking things through and, as a result, do nothing but make current problems worse or create new problems.

If the left was actually serious about any of their “green” agenda, they would be concentrating all their resources towards upgrading the power grid to support it. Instead, in their “infrastructure” bill, they waste money on hiking trails in Michelle’s name and bridges to watch birds from. Why isn’t every nickel going towards the grid and energy production?

The answer is simple: Democrats only create problems, they never solve one. Is California building mor power plants? No. Is California building the infrastructure to charge all those EV’s? Nope. But, there is a further reason for that.

It’s clear the earth itself isn’t capable of supporting this agenda. There isn’t enough raw material to support it and mining what IS there is in no way describable as “net zero”. I used to think this was a problem, but in the left’s way of thinking (such as it is), it’s not, really. In the “net zero” future, not just anyone that wants a vehicle gets a vehicle. You have to be part of the uber-wealthy elite to afford personal transportation and, thus, a personal space to live in and to be able to live anywhere but in communal, crime-infested, disease-spreading, tightly packed urban conclaves.

Does anyone anywhere see the kind of effort required to meet the energy demands the left itself has prescribed for the future?

Lets just put all if Washington D.C.(District of Crooks)and the UN(Useless Nations)totally on Wind and Solar power and see if they can hack it