Dr. Scott Atlas: Science Killed Itself Over COVID-19

Spread the love

Loading

By Helen Raleigh

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the American people have been told to “follow the science.” Yet for a year and a half, they’ve heard contradicting messages from self-appointed prophets of “the science” like Dr. Anthony Fauci and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
 
We learned that politicians who claimed their decisions were science-driven often ignored scientific findings that didn’t fit certain political narratives. We discovered that scientists are fallible human beings, and some would let personal interests and political views cloud their judgment.
 
Is science itself one of the victims of the COVID-19 pandemic? I asked Dr. Scott Atlas at the 13th annual Freedom Conference hosted by the Steamboat Institute, a Colorado-based nonprofit organization. Formerly a professor and chief of neuroradiology at Stanford University Medical Center, Atlas is now a senior fellow in health policy at the Hoover Institution.
 
Atlas has been under constant attacks by the left and the corporate media since he served as a special adviser to former President Trump and a member of the White House coronavirus task force from August to November 2020. The New York Times and the Washington Post ran hit pieces on Atlas, questioning his qualifications despite his distinguished career and scholarship.
 
Google-owned YouTube also removed a 50-minute video of Atlas’s interview with the Hoover Institute. Twitter took down his tweet that questioned the effectiveness of masks.
 
‘Science’ Destroyed Its Own Credibility
 
Atlas has refused to be silenced. He has a lot to say about how the scientific field and Americans’ trust in it have been tremendously harmed during the COVID-19 pandemic. “Science has been not just a victim,” he told me, “but actively participated in the self-destruction of its credibility.”
 

 
To prove his point, Atlas referred to the now infamous letter published in Lancet, which denounced the lab-leak theory as a “conspiracy” that created “fear, rumors, and prejudice.” Facebook “fact-checkers” used the letter to censor discussion of the lab-leak theory for more than a year.
 
It then surfaced in The Daily Mail that Peter Daszak, president of Eco Health Alliance, orchestrated a group of scientists to write the letter without disclosing the EHA’s close financial ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Now many scientists accept that the WIV lab-leak theory is just as probable as the natural origin theory.
 
Atlas also faulted leading scientific publications such as Nature and Lancet for playing “important roles in enabling, encouraging, and enforcing the false narrative.” In June, journalist Ian Birrell cited one source who estimated the publisher of Nature had sponsorship agreements worth millions of dollars from Chinese institutions.
 
“Science is not supposed to be about intimidating, countering interpretation of data, or abusing, or censoring data,” Atlas said. “Science is not supposed to have a view. Science is only about data and the scientific process. There is never supposed to be ‘an accepted view’ of science.”
 
Stop Censoring the Scientific Process
 
Politicians and pundits also lost people’s trust by advocating regulations that were not based in fact. “The phrase ‘follow the science’ should never be uttered again by people who do not know actual data. They must stop,” Atlas said. “They have no credibility whatsoever when they get up and say, ‘follow the science.’ It’s clear many of them don’t know the science, don’t understand the science, and they are not using the science to make the recommendations.”
 



 
How can science and scientists recover from this trust deficit? “It depends on only one thing — the visibility of the scientific process, which by definition is about the visibility of the data,” Atlas said. “There should be no censorship of views and interpretation of different data. Do not intimidate or issue harsh condemnations of people just because you disagree with them. Let the truth prevail by the data.”
 
He has received hundreds of emails from other scientists who have encouraged him to remain outspoken while afraid to speak up themselves. “The saving of science really depend[s] on scientists to come forward and to be unafraid to say that the objectivity of science and [the] scientific process itself has been contaminated and impeded,” he continued. “When more scientists come forward, there hopefully will be a reversal of that [trust deficit]. There is no such thing as science without the evidence being visible and debates being current. Science doesn’t exist in any other way.”
 
How can we do a better job of fighting back the next time our ruling class tries to send us into crisis mode? We have to recognize what the data revealed about this current pandemic, Atlas said, citing several recent studies (including one by Eran Bendavid and other scientists of Stanford University) showing that lockdowns didn’t work to keep COVID-19 from spreading while imposing their own severe additional costs.
 
Never Let Lockdowns Destroy Lives Again
 
Lockdowns destroyed people, Atlas said, by “shutting down medical care, stopping people from seeking emergency medical care, increasing drug abuse, increasing death by suicide, more psychological damage, particularly among the younger generation. Hundreds and thousands of child abuse cases went unreported. Teenagers’ self-harm cases have tripled.”
 
Atlas also noted the increase of other deaths like tuberculosis, caused by the world’s focus on COVID-19. The World Health Organization warned in 2020 of up to an additional 400,000 deaths from tuberculosis because of the diversion of resources to COVID-19. “Mortality data showing that anywhere from a third or half of the deaths during the pandemic were not due to COVID-19,” Atlas said. “They were extra deaths due to the lockdowns.”

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Democrats simply want to obey, as long as the orders are coming from Democrats. They don’t care about what masks actually do, good or bad; they simply want to be the first to line up to obey any arbitrary directive issued by Democrats and insist everyone else blindly follow suit; if for no other reason that to make them look less stupid.

It’s been proven definitively that regions where masks are mandated fare no better than regions where masks were optional. People submit to this pointless mandate (and numerous others) like lemmings trying to be the first to the edge of the cliff.

Some actual real COVID-19 related biology.

https://m.twitch.tv/gigaohmbiological/home

COVID-19 has killed 642,000 Americans since January 2020.

Correction;

Me fauci and biden have killed 642,000 Americans since January 2020.

There, fixed it for you

Your sock puppet is showing again.

They have now recorded 13,627 deaths, 2,826,646 injuries, and 1,429 fetal deaths from pregnant women who took a COVID shot.

Official U.S. Government Stats on COVID Vaccines: 13,627 Deaths 2,826,646 Injuries 1,429 Fetal Deaths in Pregnant Women

Around 869.7 of every 100,000 Americans die each year. That works out to 8,697 per million. 169.6 million have been vaccinated. Do the arithmetic. A significant number people would “die after vaccination” if the injection were nothing but sterile distilled water. The same is true of other reported adverse events.

“Deaths following vaccination” doesn’t mean “deaths due to vaccination”. Also, the VAERS is a passive reporting system—a compilation of reports made by individuals or relatives, not a controlled system of reports from medical sources. They’re collecting anecdotal reports to look for patterns of adverse events that could warrant closer controlled examination.

The article misrepresents what the data actually means.

https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html

Biden Lies to Rabbis and Claims He Came “Out of the Civil Rights Movement” In Delaware During the 1960s

New Ad Highlights Joe Biden and His Afghanistan Exit Mess

New Ad Highlights Joe Biden and His Afghanistan Exit Mess

Idiot Biden promised to shut down the virus. He said Trump mishandled the virus and NO ONE would have died if his plan was followed.

Why hasn’t idiot Biden made the virus go away?

What Happened In Wuhan? Fauci Helped The Chinese Create A Monster
comment image

For eighteen months this nation has been rocked by the COVID-19 pandemic. It has disrupted our lives and personal relationships. It has shattered our economy. It has precipitated the largest assault on civil liberties in our history. And, yet, all these many months later a clear picture of how this event occurred and who is responsible remains elusive.

Let’s see what we can do to change that.

Virtually everyone agrees that the point of origin of the pandemic is Wuhan, China. The Chinese government claims that the virus came out of a “wet market” a place where live animals are sold as food. COVID-19 is one of a family of viruses known to infect bats. There are no bats sold as food in “wet markets” in Wuhan.

The Chinese government has never produced any evidence to support its “wet market” contention. Investigation of viral outbreaks relies heavily on contact tracing and identifying the first person infected, “patient zero.” The Chinese have never been able to produce this kind of data in reference to COVID-19.

Wuhan is also the home of multiple Chinese biological research labs. One of these is China’s premier BSL-4 research lab – the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Extensive work has been done at this facility on coronaviruses like COVID-19, which occur in bats. The bats in question are not native to the region around Wuhan. Researchers travel hundreds of miles to other parts of China to capture bats in large numbers and then transport them back to Wuhan for study.

Lab procedures at the Wuhan lab were known to be sloppy and dangerous. As detailed in a recent Congressional report on the origins of the virus, senior Chinese scientific personnel expressed concerns about safety at Chinese labs in the summer of 2019 before the pandemic began. Bat bites of researchers were so common a log was kept to track them. Researchers going into caves to collect bats were often covered in bat urine and feces.

There were multiple requests for maintenance at the WIV, including in a new facility that had been operational for only a short time. Some of those requests included maintenance on “environmental air disinfection system” and the “hazardous waste treatment system.”

In 2018, U.S. State Department officials in Wuhan sent cables to Washington, D.C. highlighting concerns with safety issues at the WIV. The cables reported that scientists at the WIV noted “a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.”

Paul Graham
@paulg
·
Sep 4
“What I found was that, just months into the pandemic, a large swath of the government already believed the virus had escaped from the WIV lab, rather than having leaped from an animal to a human at the Wuhan seafood market.”

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1433290002931142660/LarByO-t?format=jpg&name=small

In 2018, Diplomats Warned of Risky Coronavirus Experiments in a Wuhan Lab. No One Listened.
After seeing a risky lab, they wrote a cable warning to Washington. But it was ignored.
politico.com

All indications are that the COVID-19 first began to spread through the city of Wuhan as early as August or September 2019. Chinese Communist Party officials took their virus database offline in the middle of the night about this time and suddenly began to seek additional funding for security. Hospitals in the Wuhan area also began to fill with patients with symptoms similar to COVID-19.

Scientists at the WIV were conducting gain-of-function research at BSL-2 and BSL-3 safety levels. A BSL-2 lab has the same safety protocols as a dentist’s office. Gain of function research is work specifically designed to make a virus more communicable and more dangerous to humans.

There is in China no meaningful distinction between civilian and military research. The Chinese have never abandoned biological warfare. Military researchers were present in the WIV at the time of the outbreak of the pandemic.

Work at the WIV was funded in part by American taxpayer’s dollars. This money came from Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. It was funneled through an outfit called EcoHealth Alliance run by an individual named Peter Daszak.

The bat coronavirus grant provided EcoHealth Alliance with a total of $3.1 million, including $599,000 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology used in part to identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans. The dangers of the gain of function research were well known at the time the funding was provided. The grant proposal acknowledged some of those dangers: “Fieldwork involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs, while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.”

Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, has stated that “The viruses they constructed were tested for their ability to infect mice that were engineered to display human type receptors on their cell.” Ebright also said the documents make it clear that two different types of novel coronaviruses were able to infect humanized mice. The specific purpose of the work funded by American citizens via EcoHealth Alliance was, in short, to make viruses that were more dangerous to humans than those occurring in nature.

Fauci knew all of this at the time. It was spelled out in the documentation provided to secure the grant that funded the work. Yet, he stayed silent about it all through the pandemic even looking the other way when Daszak, desperate to evade responsibility, actively attempted to discredit anyone who suggested the virus came out of a lab. Fauci continues to maintain this position to this day, accusing anyone who questions him, including Senator Rand Paul of lying and besmirching his reputation.

Richard H. Ebright
@R_H_Ebright
·
Sep 6
“NEWLY RELEASED documents provide details of US-funded research on..coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology..The Intercept has obtained more than 900 pages of documents detailing..work of..EcoHealth Alliance..at the Chinese lab..”

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1435047173117317122/2LLgYD-o?format=jpg&name=small

New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research at Chinese Lab
More than 900 pages of materials related to US.-funded coronavirus research in China were released following a FOIA lawsuit by The Intercept.
theintercept.com
3 more replies
Richard H. Ebright
@R_H_Ebright
·
Sep 6
The materials confirm the grants supported the construction–in Wuhan–of novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses that combined a spike gene from one coronavirus with genetic information from another coronavirus, and confirmed the resulting viruses could infect human cells.
Richard H. Ebright
@R_H_Ebright
·
Sep 6
The materials reveal that the resulting novel, laboratory-generated SARS-related coronaviruses also could infect mice engineered to display human receptors on cells (“humanized mice”).
Richard H. Ebright
@R_H_Ebright
·
Sep 6
The materials further reveal for the first time that one of the resulting novel, laboratory-generated SARS-related coronaviruses–one not been previously disclosed publicly–was more pathogenic to humanized mice than the starting virus from which it was constructed…
Richard H. Ebright
@R_H_Ebright
·
Sep 6
…and thus not only was reasonably anticipated to exhibit enhanced pathogenicity, but, indeed, was *demonstrated* to exhibit enhanced pathogenicity.
Richard H. Ebright
@R_H_Ebright
·
Sep 6
The materials further reveal that the the grants also supported the construction–in Wuhan–of novel chimeric MERS-related coronaviruses that combined spike genes from one MERS-related coronavirus with genetic information from another MERS-related coronavirus.

The evidence does not just suggest strongly that the virus escaped from a lab. It shows that is very likely manmade and the deliberate result of precisely the kind of gain of function research Fauci was funding. Writing in the Wall Street Journal in June of this year, two scientists Dr. Steven Quay and Richard Muller noted specific aspects of the structure of the virus, which are essentially never seen in nature, but which are characteristic of human intervention and manipulation.

Quay and Muller, both researchers at Berkeley, noted that of the 36 possible genome pairings that can produce two arginine amino acids in a row, which results in boosting a virus’ lethality, the one most commonly used in gain-of-function research is CGG-CGG, or double CGG. They also noted that this pairing, which is found in COVID-19 has never been found naturally. It is only seen in organisms that have been genetically engineered by humans.

“Proponents of zoonotic origin must explain why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG,” Quay and Muller wrote. “Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?

et
See new Tweets
Tweet
Brit Hume
@brithume
·
Jun 7
The Covid-19 pathogen has a genetic footprint that has never been observed in a natural coronavirus, write
@quay_dr
and Richard Muller
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1434550498359595008/2vHeU2un?format=jpg&name=small

Opinion | The Science Suggests a Wuhan Lab Leak
The Covid-19 pathogen has a genetic footprint that has never been observed in a natural coronavirus.
wsj.com

None of that should have been a surprise to Fauci. As early as January 31, 2020, in an email from U.S. virus researcher Kristian Andersen, Fauci was told the same thing. Andersen, who runs a viral genomics lab at Scripps Research in La Jolla, Calif., wrote, “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered,” he wrote. Andersen also noted that he and others “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.”

Eighteen months ago, we were as a nation blindsided by this pandemic. Fauci was not. He had been for years funneling money to a Chinese lab working on creating precisely the monster that we now faced. The point of origin of the disease, its structure and its communicability all pointed to only one conclusion. COVID-19 was made in a Chinese lab and then released, intentionally or by human error on the world.

What Dr. Fauci should have done at that point was to reveal everything and anything he knew about the origins of the disease and provide the nation with the best possible chance of getting ahead of the pandemic and understanding how to control it. He did not. He lied. He covered up. He put his own personal reputation and position ahead of the lives of his countrymen.

Incredibly, Fauci not only retains his position but continues to be the face of our public health response to the pandemic. Seemingly immune to accountability, he continues to attempt to conceal the truth to this day. If there is any shred of integrity left anywhere in the federal government, that should end, and it should end today. Fauci should be fired. Federal charges against him should be filed, and we ought to lay out the whole ugly truth about what happened in Wuhan.

Maskless Nancy Pelosi Pictured Hanging Out with George Soros and Son This Past Weekend
comment image