DOJ to Colorado Family: Give Up Your Religion or Your Business

Spread the love

Loading

Terence P. Jeffrey:

The Justice Department last week presented the Newland family of Colorado–who own Hercules Industries, a heating, ventilation and air-conditioning business–with what amounted to an ultimatum: Give up your religion or your business.

“Hercules Industries has ‘made no showing of a religious belief which requires that [it] engage in the [HVAC] business,” the Justice Department said in a formal filing in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

In response to the Justice Department’s argument that the Newlands can either give up practicing their religion or give up owning their business, the Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing the family, said in a reply brief: “[T]o the extent the government is arguing that its Mandate does not really burden the Newlands because they are free to abandon their jobs, their livelihoods, and their property so that others can take over Hercules and comply, this expulsion from business would be an extreme form of government burden.”

Now that the Supreme Court has upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its mandate that individuals must buy health insurance, this suit which seeks to protect a small business from being forced to take actions that violate the moral and religious beliefs of the family that owns it is likely to be the next major court battle over Obamacare.

At stake is whether businesses are protected by the First Amendment—the part of the Bill of Rights that guarantees not only the free exercise of religion but also freedom of speech and of the press.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

You know, society would be much better off without religion.

@Liberal1 (objectivity):

You know, society would be much better off without religion.

Why yes, and here is ample documentation of just that: The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression

Liberal1[objectivity]
this is your opinion, and your side opinion,
but the people are not of that opinion, and to force a person to choose
between his busyness and his religion is going too far, in that snaky inch by inch crawl to impose the COMMUNIST AGENDA TO GET PEOPLE TO OBEY THE COMMAND OF THEIR SICK PLAN
OR PERISH, LIKE SO MANY PEOPLE DISAPEARING IN THIS AMERICA, IF EVER FOUND ARE DEAD, LIKE THE REGIME OF COMMUNIST IN OTHER COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD,
AND THEY HERE IN THE WHITE HOUSE AS LEADER EXCHANGING SECRETS WHICH NO AMERICAN SHOULD KNOW, THAT TELL YOU OF THE FINE COOPERATION BETWEEN COMMUNIST AROUND THE WORLD, THEY ARE BROTHER IN MIND, AND THE GOAL IS TO WIN POWER TO REDUCE THE PEOPLE INTO SLAVERY, IT IS CLEARER AS THEY ARE NOT HIDING ANYMORE,
THEY EVEN WANT TO CHANGE THE CITIZENRY OF THIS COUNTRY BY ALIEN FROM ANY OTHER COUNTRIES, AS LONG AS THEY GIVE THEIR ALLEGEANCE NOT TO THE CONSTITUTION BUT TO OBAMA AND HIS GROUP.
DID YOU NOTICE THOSE WHO DISAPEAR ARE BORN AMERICAN MOSTLY WHITE?
CHECK IT UP, YOU MIGHT BE NEXT, OBAMA ADD who said it’s scary to be A WOMAN
because of MITT ROMNEY?
HELL IT’S SCARY TO BE A BORN AMERICAN BECAUSE OF OBAMA REGIME AND DANGEROUS AGENDA AND HIS
UNIONIZE AGENCIES SCARING THE BUSYNESS OWNERS AND THE FARMER’S FAMILIES

@Liberal1 (objectivity):

No Problem Liberal, start with the Muslims when you have them all convinced come back and speak to the Christians. We won’t hold our breath waiting.

@Aleric

The silly thing about Lib1’s post is that there would be no societies without religion. All human institutions, society and culture are founded upon the Sacred. It is surprising that most college educated adults are so unaware.

What is more difficult to apprehend is that Gospels undermine all forms of the Sacred, even Christianity’s own Sacred.

It is no accident that anti-religion radical secularist states have descended into filling mass graves since 14 July 1789.

This is a chilling paragraph:

“The government’s exclusionary attitude would push religion out of every sphere of life except the four wall[s] of a church,” they said in their brief. “If for-profit corporations have no First Amendment ‘purpose,’ newspapers and other media would have no rights.”

Most people are unfamiliar with the Islamic Sharia teaching about the ”rights” of other religions in their midst.
It is VERY SIMILAR to the above!
It adds that the churches may never be remodeled, improved, expanded or even repaired if damaged by human or natural disasters.
It also refuses to allow any new churches to be built.
And no permits are even granted for expanding graveyards.

The contracting of the right to a persona conscience to within the walls of one’s church is also very aligned with Islam’s Sharia, which is a religion that does not acknowledge persona conscience within its own adherants.

Odd, that Obama wants to impose this particular constraint on religions other than Islam.
Remember, Muslims are exempt from ObamaCare because they consider this type of insurance to be haram, unIslamic.

If I remember correctly, the reason corporations have the right to donate to individual campaigns, is because of a first ammendment right. That was the Supreme Court ruling.

Hey folks, if you reply to the ignornant babblings of Liberal1, it makes the rest of us question your sanity, too! LOL

Randy
hi,
I’m coming back from YOU TUBE, LOOKING AT THE VIETNAM WAR,
HOW MANY DIED 58000, THEY CALL IT
THE AMERICAN HOLOCAUST
IT WAS A TERRIBLE PLACE, A TERRIBLE WAR,
YES ALL WARS ARE, BUT THOSE GUYS HAD A BAD DEAL,
I WANT TO HONOR ESPECIALLY NOW THE VALIANT [ OF PERSONS OR CONDUCT BRAVES COURAGEOUS
OF VALOUR BE WORTH, BE STRONG,] WARRIORS FORGOTTEN BY SOME DESPICABLE IGNORANT PEOPLE,
FOR THOSE WHO MADE IT BACK.
IT’S MY FIRST TIME TO RUN IN THE MANY VIDEOS ABOUT THE SOLDIERS OF VIETNAM.
THEY ARE ALL THE HEROS OF THIS AMERICA.

Lib1 said;

You know, society would be much better off without religion.

That is spoken like a true liberal/progressive. A person who believes that they know, better than you, how you should live your life. And a person who would have in office a person like them, who would be your master.

Lib1 is a person who believes in slavery as an institution.

Marxism is the Progressive religion, but since it doesn’t fit the description of a religion it is OK to the brain dead.

UPDATE:

A federal court said Friday that a Colorado-based company does not have to comply with the Obama administration’s birth-control mandate because of the employer’s religious beliefs.

Judge John Kane emphasized that his ruling only applies to the specific company whose lawsuit he considered — Colorado-based Hercules Industries.

http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/abortion/240819-court-temporarily-blocks-contraception-mandate

@Liberal1 (objectivity):

Wait… Are you a liberal who supposed to preach tollerance or a fascist that seeks to stamp out what you don’t understand? Under current Law that is provided by the constitution of the USA any citizen is allowed to practice their religion (or refusal to worship) without discrimination by government or private citizens. Another example of the DoJ is getting out o line. And the last few nations that went all natural atheist kinda ended up genocidal on its citizens, such as People Republic of China Mao reign trying to kill off buddhists and Christians before the current regime change or how the former USSR for forcefully tried to starve off or worked to literal death Ukrainians in what we now know as the holodorom.

You, notsoliberal1, are a very disgusting bigot.

@Skookum:

Marxists and fellow travelers have long chafed at that comparison suggesting that Communism is in substance a religion. There are a number of Marxist scholars who I respect, one whom is Eugene Genovese. After a half a century as a Marxist Genovese conceded that there is something to it, Communism has religious aspect. Remember, Buddhism is a religion and Buddhism has NO deity. Eugene Genovese’s Marxist wife converted to Catholicism towards the end of her life. Dr. Genovese followed her and returned to the Catholic of his youth.

@Nan G:

Yes on point. Islam claims to provided for freedom of worship as do many Progressives including no few Clintonistas and Obamanites.. They will not however allow freedom of practice of religion [freedom of exercise of religion] where they can enforce their supremacies..

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That no law part seems pretty clear to me.