Subscribe
Notify of

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

As I was watching the video, I wondered if George Bush knew about the ban on guns on military bases. I’m guessing he didn’t, or I’m sure he would have voided that executive order.

You have to ask yourself why a president would want troops on military bases not to have guns. With violence around the world increasing, and more countries hating America, and with more countries getting better weapons, you would think that a president would want a military base to be able to defend itself against an attack.

I’m guessing that the guns are kept in very few places, so if the base were attacked, the terrorists would go to those places first, then the rest of the base would be defenseless. The troops might even be shot by their own guns.

As I have asked different times, who’s side do you think obama is on?

Why no guns on military bases: Issue weapons or private? If issue, accountability is a problem. If a soldier’s individual weapon is a rifle, how many magazines does he carry? Written combat load or real-life load? Close to 90 percent of soldiers serve in non-combat MOS and do not receive sufficient weapons training. If you have a rifle or pistol and come upon an active shooting and everybody else has a weapon, whom do you shoot? Just some quick thoughts.

SgtBob,
YOU HAVE A GOOD POINT,
BUT IF YOU SEE ONE IN FRONT, AND ONE DOWN, IT VERY LIKELY IS, THE SHOOTER STILL SHOOTING YOU, AND ON YOUR WAY IN YOU MOST LIKELY FIGURED IT,
EDIT” IF YOU’RE NOT SURE THE MOVE IS TO NOT MOVE STAY AWAY,
the enemy never knock, he attack by surprise,
be it a hater or a sick mind,
why should the military be disarmed, that guy would have been dead before he put his hand to get his weapon,
and why? because he is facing a military use and trained to expect a guy reach for his weapon
for only one action it’s to shoot,
we heard there was a argument between some maybe only the two of them, but there was those unarmed close and hearing the argument, they are dead now, because they where unarmed,
the irony is probably that the one arguing was suspicious ,
he had a gut feeling, which their training teach and develop,
so he might have ask the other if he had a weapon before letting him in further, and the sick mind got angry to be rebuff because yes he had a weapon and knew he couldn’t enter,
and shoot unarmed MILITARIES,
WITH ALL WHAT IS GOING ON OUTSIDE THE FORTHOOD,
THEY SHOULD HAVE A GUN,CONCEALED,
THERE WAS A CROWD OUTSIDE, SOMEWHERE ELSE, A SCUFLE STARTED, WORD
MUST HAVE BEEN EXCHANGE FROM THE MARINE, TAKEN ON CAMERA,
A GUY RUN FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CROUD, AND HE ATTACK A MARINE
SLASHING HIS FACE FROM ONE EAR TO THE OTHER, IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN A LATINO HE HAD A BROKEN BOTTLE AND DID IT VERY FAST AND RAN AWAY,AFTER,
YOU COULD HEAR A YELP FROM THE MARINE WHO NEVER EXPECTED IT, THE CAMERA BLANK
THE NEWS DID NOT MENTIONED IT OR I MISSED IT, I KNEW HE WAS A MARINE BECAUSE SOMEONE SAID IT,
I’M STILL WONDERING HOW HE IS,

@SgtBob: #2

If a soldier’s individual weapon is a rifle, how many magazines does he carry?

I’m guessing that if guns would be allowed on base, they would be pistols only, and there would be standards to meet. For example, if they are Special Forces, they automatically qualify.

Imagine being trained how to use almost ALL of the guns around the world, having been sent to different places around the world, been in several firefights, then when you return to a military base, you have to surrender your pistol. Thank you Bill Clinton.