Did White House arm al-Qaida operatives who killed U.S. ambassador?

Spread the love

Loading

Aaron Klein @ WND:

JERUSALEM – While echoes of the “Fast and Furious” scandal still resound in the White House, another administration decision at the heart of Obama’s Mideast policy may prove even more explosive.

Almost entirely missing from the debate surrounding the anti-U.S. attacks in Libya is the administration’s policy of arming jihadists to overthrow Mideast governments. But in the case of Libya, the arming of jihadists may have directly resulted in the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks against the U.S. consulate in Benghazi and the subsequent murder of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, private security employees and former U.S. Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

After changing its story multiple times, the White House finally conceded the deadly assault on the U.S. consulate was a planned attack linked to al-Qaida, as per information released by national intelligence agencies.

The admission prompted Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., to call for the resignation of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice for pushing the narrative that the attacks were part of a spontaneous uprising.

King may instead want to focus his investigative energies on the larger story: How the Obama administration armed Libyan rebels who were known to include al-Qaida and other anti-Western jihadists, and how the White House is currently continuing that same policy in Syria.

During the revolution against Muammar Gadhafi’s regime, the U.S. admitted to directly arming the rebel groups.

At the time, rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi boasted in an interview that a significant number of the Libyan rebels were al-Qaida gunmen, many of whom had fought U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Hasidi insisted his fighters “are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists,” but he added that the “members of al-Qaida are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader.”

Even Adm. James Stavridis, NATO supreme commander for Europe, admitted during the Libyan revolution that Libya’s rebel force may include al-Qaida: “We have seen flickers in the intelligence of potential al-Qaida, Hezbollah.”

At the time, former CIA officer Bruce Riedel went even further, telling the Hindustan Times: “There is no question that al-Qaida’s Libyan franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, is a part of the opposition. It has always been Gadhafi’s biggest enemy and its stronghold is Benghazi. What is unclear is how much of the opposition is al-Qaida/Libyan Islamic Fighting Group – 2 percent or 80 percent.”

The arming of the Libyan rebels may have aided in the attacks on our consulate in Libya. One witness to those attacks said some of the gunmen attacking the U.S. installation had identified themselves as members of Ansar al-Shariah, which represents al-Qaida in Yemen and Libya.

The al-Qaida offshoot released a statement denying its members were behind the deadly attack, but a man identified as a leader of the Ansar brigade told Al Jazeera the group indeed took part in the Benghazi attack.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Just to keep things fair. It was Amnesty McShame who openly called the Libyan “rebels” heros and actively wanted to arm them, despite some of their “leaders” admitting that they had recently been fighting against us in Afghanistan.

The only weapons we should give muslims are the ones that go “boom” when they are received.

JustAl
hi,
THE BEST WEAPON INDEED, HOW COME THE ELECTED DON’T THINK ABOUT THAT,
IT WOULD FIX A LOT OF THEM, AND MAKE THEM PEACEFUL

We sleep with them in Syria.

MOS8541
ARE YOU THERE NOW?

It was not long ago, when Leftists were calling the al-Qaeda and Taliban enemy in Afghanistan Freedom Fighters. Lest we forget where their true loyalties lie, it is not with the USA as we know it.

It’s not unusual when trying to neutralize a dictatorship by supplying arms to the rebels, that some of these arms may fall into unfriendly hands and be used against us. It’s naive to think otherwise.

Liberal[objectivity]
it is naive to distribute weapons to help a rebellion in a
country which is sovereign
no excuses’
now we see why those dictators needed to run their COUNTRY
WITH AN IRON FIST,