Did the AIDS virus originate from the US Special Virus Cancer Program?


by Rhoda Wilson

The book ‘Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola: Nature, Accident, or Intentional?’ presents a thorough exploration of the origins of HIV and Ebola viruses. It clearly explains and documents how, when, where and why the viruses that now threaten humanity’s extinction were made and got loose, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz said in 2016.

We’re not just talking about AIDS and Ebola. Today, civilization is challenged similarly by ZIKA, the West Nile Virus, H1N1-H5N1 flu virus recombinants, and more.

To grasp the “bigger picture,” researchers and educated consumers need to understand the basis for all these new “emerging viruses.” This is best done by reading the actual government contracts. These records even show how much the viral engineers and vaccine makers were paid for what amounts to “genocide,” according to Dr. Horowitz and many other whistleblowers.

The above paragraphs are taken from an email sent out by Medical Veritas in 2016.  Twenty years after Dr. Horowitz discovered the text of the US Special Virus Cancer Program, Medical Veritas, for which Dr. Horowitz is editor-in-chief, circulated and published this email that described how the text was discovered and its implications.

“Initially concealed for ‘national security’ reasons by federal officials, this Special Virus Cancer Program text is must reading for any serious cancer researcher,” Medical Veritas wrote.

Background for Context

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz is a renowned authority in the fields of public health, behavioural science, emerging diseases, and natural healing. He is a Harvard University-trained expert in health education and media persuasion, with additional expertise in genetics, electrogenetics, virology, and vaccine research and development.

Dr. Horowitz announced in 1997 that while searching for the final piece of evidence to conclude his research on the origin of the AIDS virus, he had discovered the Special Viral Cancer Program (“SVCP”) text in the Chapel Hill Davis Library the year before.

The New York Times published an article on 19 November 1972 about an agreement between Soviet Union and United States cancer specialists to expand joint efforts in the fight against cancer. The article mentioned when the US cancer programme began: “In the United States, a Special Virus Cancer Program has been officially funded by Congress since 1964 at the rate of $50 million a year. It encompasses 131 research institutions.”

In around 2002, there must have been an accusation made that the SVCP created the AIDS virus because on 17 June of that year, the US General Accounting Office (“GAO”) sent a report to James A. Traficant, Jr. member of the House of Representatives and concluded: “There is no evidence that SVCP created the AIDS virus.”  In its correspondence with Rep. Traficant GAO also noted:

In 1972, SVCP developed a flowchart depicting research programme to investigate viral oncology (the study of how viruses cause cancer). Outcome of SVCP did not lead to discovery of viruses in human cancer cells, but did result in several advances in molecular biology.

Origin of the AIDS Virus (17-JUN-02, GAO-02-809R)

While we do not know what flowchart GAO was referring to as the attachments are not included with the correspondence above, the 1972 date led us to an invite to the Seventh Joint Working Conference of the SVCP held on 1 November 1972 archived online by the Wellcome Collection.  The invite, from SVCP chairman Dr. J.B. Maloney, was printed on the letterhead for the US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, now called the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”).

We haven’t read the 21-page invite but skimming through it, we noticed a few interesting remarks:

It may be that tumour-associated molecules we seek are not due to mutations, but rather are the result of virus infection.  The genes for the proteins in question may be the product of viral genes … Could human cancer be due to virus infection, could the tumour-associated molecules or antigens be the product of these viruses, can human cancer be prevented by vaccination?  These were exciting ideas. [page 5 & 6]

It is obvious a large programme could be built around them.  Large programmes can only be built around concepts that can be put in one or two words: SPACE, NUCLEAR, ENERGY, POLLUTION, CANCER VIRUSES.  The result was the largest planned, integrated, generously funded biological programme in the entire history of the planet.  It was the testing ground of many new administrative concepts.  It marked the entrance of planners and planning from the Department of Defence into the biomedical arena.  Use was made of contract research on a large scale, of the expertise in management and programmatic research of industry.  Research laboratories in this country and abroad were mobilised.  The triggering event was the discovery of virus-like particles in human leukemic plasma – VLPs as they came to be called. [page 5 & 6]

The search for oncogenic virus did, however, take an exciting turn: human upper respiratory viruses – adenoviruses – were found to cause cancer in newborn hamsters.  The same was true of the monkey virus, SV40, which had been a contaminant of some lots of early Salk vaccine, had not been completely inactivated, and had been injected live into thousands of humans including quite a few infants. [page 7, emphasis added]

[Note: The AstraZeneca covid-19 vaccine, also known as Vaxzevria, is a viral vector vaccine that uses a weakened chimpanzee adenovirus to deliver genetic material to the body. Pfizer’s covid vaccine contains an SV40 promoter.]

Interest now turned to RNA viruses and to the reverse transcriptase involved in their reproduction … The virus genes had somehow become incorporated into the normal genes of the animal and spread throughout the whole species … Here, then, is a gene brought into animals eons ago allowing the appearance of a new antigen not previously found in the species.  Not only that: even though the gene caused a disease – cancer – it spread and became universal … There are some aspects of this concept that are too good to miss.  If genes can be transplanted willy-nilly around the animal and plant kingdoms, then this could be a mechanism for promoting evolution par excellence. Many viruses cross species barriers.  Some viruses will infect both plants and animals.  If we knew the full map of the cross-species infections. I believe that we could find a gene that could be transported from almost any organism to almost any other.  One could conceive a vast viral postal system routing genes around “on approval.”  An amoeba may develop a better phosphatase than I have, and the gene involved may reach me piggyback on London Flu.  Quite exciting. [page 8, emphasis added]

Meanwhile researchers from around the world have been sequencing proteins from many different species and have come to the very opposite conclusion.  Evolution occurs very slowly, one amino acid at a time. [page 8]

Invite to Seventh Joint Working Conference of the Special Virus Cancer Program from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 21 August 1972

What do you think the author might have been getting at? Was the SVCP only about discovering what caused cancer?

Due to the outside chance that documents such as these may not be available for public view at some point in the future, for whatever reason, we have attached a copy of the invite to the Seventh Joint Working Conference of the Special Virus Cancer Program below.

Overview of the Special Virus Cancer Program

The following is a summary generated by an artificial intelligence (“AI”) program in response to the query “Special Virus Cancer Program August 1972.”

The Special Virus Cancer Program, also known as the SVCP, was a research program initiated in August 1972 to investigate the role of viruses in the development of cancer. The program was a collaborative effort between the United States and Japan, and its primary goal was to identify and isolate viruses that could cause cancer in humans.

The program was led by Dr. Frank Rapp and involved a multidisciplinary team of researchers from various institutions. The team used a combination of laboratory experiments and clinical studies to investigate the relationship between viruses and cancer.

During the course of the program, the researchers identified several viruses that were associated with cancer, including the human T-cell leukaemia virus (“HTLV”) and the human papillomavirus (“HPV”). These findings led to the development of new treatments and prevention strategies for cancer, including the use of antiviral therapies and vaccines.

The SVCP also led to the establishment of the United States and Japan Cooperative Cancer Research Program, which continued to support research on the relationship between viruses and cancer. The program’s findings have had a significant impact on our understanding of cancer and have led to the development of new treatments and prevention strategies.

In terms of code, there is no specific code related to the SVCP, as it was a research program and not a software development project. However, the program’s findings have led to the development of new software tools and databases for the analysis of genomic and proteomic data.

[The paragraph immediately above appears out of place however the AI program may have inserted it due to the differences in English and American spelling.  In British English, “program” is used to describe computer software and “programme” is used to describe a plan, system or TV show.  In American English, “program” is used to describe both.  As the ‘Special Virus Cancer Program’ was an American initiative, we used the American spelling in our search query.)

Here are some relevant references:

  • Rapp F. Special virus cancer program: travails of a biological moonshot. Science. 1972;175(4026):1061-a.
  • Gross RE, Van Zee KJ, Heerdt AS. The Special Surveillance Breast Program: a model of intervention for women at high risk for breast cancer. J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 1997;28(4):9-12.
  • Sullivan J, Suyono H, Bahrawi W, Hartoadi A. Contraceptive use-effectiveness in Mojokerot Regency, Indonesia: a comparison of regular program and special drive acceptors. Stud Fam Plann. 1976;7(7):188-96.
  • Sakurai Y. Rehabilitation in women with breast cancer-special problems in hereditary diseases. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986;13(4 Pt 1):871-7.

Source reference: Rapp F. Special virus cancer program. Science. 1972 Mar 10;175(4026):1061-2. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4026.1061-a. PMID: 17797370.

Special Virus Cancer Program – Must Reading for Cancer Researchers

By Medical Veritas

[Please note:  We have not edited the original in any way so American spelling is used in the text below.]

Initially concealed for “national security” reasons by federal officials, this Special Virus Cancer Program text is must reading for any serious cancer researcher.



Release: No. 96-2016-EV/6

For Immediate Release

Date mailed: December 5, 2016

Contact: Editor@medicalveritas.org

Special Virus Cancer Program Concealed Contracts Evidencing Man-Made AIDS Pandemic Released in 20-Year Anniversary of Amazing Discovery

Honolulu, HI — Twenty years ago Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz presented a shocking new theory on the man-made origin of HIV/AIDS at the XI International Conference on AIDS in Vancouver where he challenged the virus’s purported “discoverer,” Dr. Robert Gallo. That session was video taped, republished widely on the Internet, viewed by millions, and eventually cost Gallo his Nobel Prize in Medicine. it also got Horowitz blacklisted from the medical lecture circuit.

[We have uploaded a copy of the video referred to above from Revolution Television (see below).  The description below the video on Revolution Television’s website reads: “Where did AIDS come from? Some say it doesn’t matter, as long as we find a cure. But what if the man and money that created it, are still spreading it along with lies and half-truths? Watch this clip from In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood & Bioterrorism, to learn where AIDS really originated.”]

To celebrate this anniversary, and the lives of more than 20 million people worldwide who have since died of AIDS, Horowitz is republishing the National Cancer Institute’s censored Special Virus Cancer Program text originally published in 1972, for the eyes of only top officials.


In a 1996 press release, Horowitz, a Harvard-trained public health expert and medical educator, revealed that the AIDS virus (HIV-1) “did not likely originate naturally from African green monkeys,” as Dr. Gallo had promoted, nor from “Patient Zero” – a gay flight attendant named Gaetan Dugas. Instead, Horowitz’s three-year study concluded that the virus, and the associated pandemic, more likely evolved from early cancer virus vaccine experiments in which top military–pharmaceutical scientists infected monkeys and chimpanzees with viral genes from other animals to produce an array of “novel” illnesses. The primary focus of massive money and drug company investments was on the never-before-seen leukemia-lymphoma-sarcoma immune-suppression cancer complex now called AIDS.

“Such methods of recombining “novel” cancer triggers used by National Cancer Institute (NCI) researchers during the ‘Special Virus Cancer Program’ in the late 1960s, aimed to develop cancer “models” for human vaccine trials. The largely-funded mostly-secret program “generated grave outbreak risks” Horowitz concluded in this “first in-depth scientific exploration into the origin of the epidemic.”

Earlier this year, a massive amount of publicity attended the Science journal (04 Mar 2016: Vol. 351, Issue 6277, pp. 1013) that, finally, debunked the “Patient Zero” theory. A “new genetic study of HIV isolated from blood samples taken in the late 1970s clarifies where and when the epidemic began in the United States – and it does not involve a man infamously labeled as ‘Patient Zero’,” the journal published.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

And those Chem-Trails from those Jets l flying way over our heads what are they spraying on us?

My mother was the head of the Red Cross’s Public Health for Southern California at the time HIV/AIDS was getting a foothold in the homosexual community there in the 1970’s.
She desperately wanted to institute a strict protocol of sexual histories and quarantines.
But Fauci refused to allow this.
He wanted to see how the infection “played out,” to quote her at the time they were fighting in letters and phone calls.
I wonder if he expected the virus to stay inside the homosexual community, or if he knew sharing needles would spread it far and wide.
I wonder how surprised he was when it traveled to the general population via blood transfusions (which used to be very common after childbirth and minor surgeries.)
I wonder if Fauci was just stupid or if he was complicit in a human experiment on purpose.

Dr. Fauci should be brought up in charges of Crimes Against Humanity along with Gates, Soros and Schwabe as well as the CFR and WEF