Dems can’t run on Obamacare and can’t hide from it either

Spread the love

Loading

Byron York:

Some Democrats hope to minimize the importance of Obamacare as a political issue by focusing on other topics in this November’s midterm elections. Some hope to win by promising to fix the flawed national health care plan they passed in 2010. And others hope to turn the issue on Republicans by appealing to voters who have been helped by the law.

The problem is, none of that will work. The importance of Obamacare as an issue in November 2014 cannot be controlled by either political party. It will be determined by just one thing, and that is the performance of Obamacare as a law in the months preceding the election.

The Obama administration obviously understands that. There is no other explanation than political expediency for its announcement last week that it is extending the “keep your plan” fix until 2016 for Americans who have coverage that doesn’t meet Obamacare’s minimum standards.

Sign Up for the Byron York newsletter!
The administration knows that the same kinds of cancellations that happened to holders of individual policies over the winter will happen later this year to people insured in the small group market. That could be a lot of newly-angry voters. So the White House put it off until after Election Day.

The administration did not take action because it feared Republicans might gin up some fake health care controversy to be used against Democrats. It took action because it knew Obamacare was going to impose new burdens on millions of Americans with an election approaching.

Obamacare is touching more and more Americans. Remember that chart cited by some liberal commentators suggesting that 80 percent of Americans would be entirely unaffected? Recent studies are showing something much different.

A survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation in February found that 54 percent of those interviewed said they have “not been personally impacted” by Obamacare. That number was down from 59 percent in January and 64 percent in December 2013. It will probably continue to fall; the 80-percent-unaffected idea was always a fantasy.

Meanwhile, Kaiser found that the number of people who say someone in their family has been “negatively affected by the health reform law” has climbed to 29 percent, up from 26 percent in December. Finally, the number of people who say someone in their family has “personally benefited” from Obamacare is at 17 percent, up from 11 percent in December. That’s not a good ratio for Obamacare advocates.

Some Democrats, and their supporters in the press, will probably argue that not all those who say they or a family member have been negatively affected by Obamacare have actually suffered any ill effect. Maybe that’s true, for some. But telling voters they’re wrong is not a particularly effective electoral strategy.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Cancer Patient Who Blamed Obamacare For ‘Unaffordable’ Costs Will Actually Save Money
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/10/obamacare-attack-ad_n_4937650.html

Yes they can.
Reason: the RINOs will not call them on their Obamacare stance.
After all, the RINOs just want to stay in office. They do not wish to stand for anything. Standing for something would be controversial, and we can’t have that.
So the Dems have a free ride. It will be like 2008, where the RINOs said we could not criticize Commander Zero, because that would be racist. The fact that he was half African (putatively) and half Hawaiian was irrelevant. None of his ancestors had been slaves.
Karl Rove does not want to rock the boat. To discuss one’s political opponent on their record would be harmful. Trust me on this. The RINOs earned their minority status the hard way: they earned it.