Democrats Ran a Puppet Show, and Jake Tapper Just Gave Us the Backstage Pass

Spread the love

Loading

Jake Tapper’s Original Sin arrives not as an exposé from the fringes, but as a solemn reckoning from within the temple. It is a confessional narrative wrapped in the form of a journalistic postmortem. The central claim, both simple and devastating, is this: Joe Biden was unfit to run in 2024, and everyone who mattered knew it. They chose to pretend otherwise, and in doing so, they triggered a political catastrophe whose implications extend far beyond a single election cycle.

Tapper, together with co-author Alex Thompson, opens the book with a vivid image of Biden’s self-mythologized mantra, “GET UP”, as a kind of metaphysical armor shielding him from the infirmities of age. It is a motif that, in more reflective hands, might have invited sympathy. Here it functions more cynically. Biden’s refusal to step aside, rooted less in courage than in pride, becomes the engine of institutional denial. The authors, having interviewed over two hundred insiders, construct a damning picture of what amounts to an elaborate political theater. The performance, sustained by party elites, legacy media, and Biden’s inner circle, demanded a suspension of disbelief from the electorate. The real drama, as the book shows, unfolded offstage.

There are moments when Tapper’s restraint lapses, allowing clarity to burst through the fog. One passage admits, almost casually, that the administration operated not through a coherent executive but by a “Politburo” of advisors, Donilon, Klain, Dunn, Dillon, each maneuvering within a power vacuum. That term, evocative of Soviet bureaucracy, is not hyperbolic. It captures the essence of the system that emerged under Biden: diffuse power with no accountability, decisions driven by fear of optics rather than national interest. What Tapper avoids saying directly is that this arrangement nullified the constitutional role of the presidency. It was government by apparatchik.

This core insight, though carefully worded, vindicates years of conservative critique. For all the mockery heaped on right-leaning observers who questioned Biden’s fitness, Original Sin confirms that those doubts were not only justified, they were understated. Tapper notes that by mid-2023, internal polling and donor panic were rampant. Yet the machine rolled on, lubricated by a cynical calculus: a declining Biden was still preferable to a Kamala Harris who inspired no confidence among voters, donors, or staff.

Some passages of the book verge on unintentional comedy. The campaign, we learn, staged a ninety-minute town hall so tightly scripted that even the cameras were banned. The footage was reportedly so unusable it was buried. More surreal still are the descriptions of staffers huddled in prayer after Biden’s debate meltdown, as though divine intervention might repair a political decision made in bad faith. These vignettes provide rare moments of dramatic tension in an otherwise studied narrative. But their meaning is unmistakable: this was not simply a mismanaged campaign, it was a cult of inertia.

To be clear, Tapper does not lay the blame solely at Biden’s feet. Indeed, one of the book’s quieter strengths is its refusal to let the president serve as a scapegoat. Biden, in his dotage, is portrayed more as a vessel than an architect. The real indictment lands on the people who knew better. Cabinet officials who said nothing. Advisors who muttered in private but lied in public. Journalists who shielded rather than investigated. Tapper himself, once counted among them, now seeks atonement through exposure. But it is an exposure hedged by hedging. For example, he refers to Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice as “independent,” a claim that strains credulity in light of documented communication between the White House and prosecutors pursuing Trump. It is a curious omission, one that preserves the Beltway norm of institutional face-saving.

Still, the value of Original Sin lies not in what it dares but in what it affirms. That the 2024 election was a case study in elite self-deception. That the media’s moral pedestal has collapsed. That the governing class, far from being stewards of democracy, became custodians of a fiction. This is not a partisan interpretation. It is the book’s thesis. One need only read the closing chapters, where Tapper recounts the post-debate fallout, the donor exodus, the vanishing of campaign surrogates, the polling collapse, to see that the illusion could not survive contact with reality.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

My wife wanted to buy the book. I asked her, why? WE already know all this; we saw it going on in real time. Which begs the question, why could we (all of us) see all this when geniuses like Tapper, Scarborough, Whoopie, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, et all could not see it? Does this finally prove, once and for all, that we on the right are infinitely more intelligent than those on the left?

Well.. yeah, but it also confirms how totally corrupt and dishonest the left is, and that includes the DNC and Ministry of Propaganda, the leftist media. They lied about every stumble, every trim, every bicycle tumble, every lie, every gaffe, every fantastic story. Even as we argued it and pointed it all out in real time, they denied and defended it. Then, all at once, in a debate, it all came tumbling down. The rat was out of the bag.

So, are we supposed to believe that all this revelation comes from intensive investigation and digging? Were lives at stake collecting this top-secret information? Bullshit. Aside from some of the inside baseball tidbits, all this was well known throughout Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden’s corrupt regime. Now, all they can do is pretend they were fooled along with everyone else (except, of course, for us). They all either knew or refused to know… which meant they knew. They didn’t report it because they didn’t “see” it? Well, they damn sure reported on Trump calling Nazis “fine people”, quid pro quo, Russian collusion, calling veterans “suckers and losers” even though NO ONE saw any of it. Again, bullshit. They are simply liars. Every damned last one of them.

There is not a single reputable Democrat anywhere. Not one. They all either lied about the truth or denied the evidence without looking deeper into the accusations. Every Democrat that voted the party ticket was in on it.

That f**king idiot Jon Stuart was having a great time making fun of Tapper for trying to sell the news they should have been giving us for free. All that is true enough, but Stuart, of course, leaves out one important detail: he is guilty, too.

The UN/Soros/Schwabe Gates, Etc. are Pulling the Strings

Anita Dunn was one of the top three rulers when joe was “president.”
Recall her past.
She had to stand down from an Obama appointment because of her praise of the Chinese Communists.
So, we just had four years of our country being run by a Chinese communist sympathizer, her Chinese Communist sympathizer husband, Bob Bauer, and Ron Klain. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/05/22/ed-martin-named-the-top-three-suspects-in-the-biden-autopen-fiasco-n2657436
It was not good.