Dem Strategist: Palin Saying “Waterboarding Is How We Baptize Terrorists” Is Offensive To Muslims

And to think, this idiot was actually and seriously considered a candidate for next in line of leader of the greatest and most powerful country on God’s green earth.

Let.us compare…..Palin makes a comment that a majority of Americans would support ridiculing islamic terrorists bent on killing or subjugating all non muslims, and that is somehow offensive. Kerry warns that Israel is becoming “an apartheid state” because Israel refuses to negotiate with palestinian pseudogovernment that has aligned itself with the muslim terrorist group Hamas….and that is considered brilliant statesmanship?

I didn’t hear say anything about ISLAMIST terrorists. What I heard was TERRORISTS. Now the clip was short and I don’t know what else she said but based on what I saw, it is the democrats making a mountain out of molehill. Obama has never said there are Islamic terrorists so I guess based on his status as a risen savior his sucka^^ toadies shouldn’t see it in everything that is said.

“Yeah, but look at the uneducated….”.

In the English language, one can construe “yeah, but” to be an agreement with exceptions, to concur yet include varibles, or maybe say ” yes, you’re right but consider”.

In your case, we all know you’re about bashing Obama, hating Obama, and never missing an oppotunity of reminding us of that. That is in fact, the function of this blog.

But your argument comes up short in presntimg those exceptions, varibles, or considerations as all it does is simply states that you do in fact agree with me about Palin (yeah, but) yet all you have to rebut is a reminder of your hatred of Obama.

To add to my argument that you shoot from the hip with hatred rather than substance, you actually called him uneducated.

Dumbass!

@MAKAYA: I suppose I could rewrite it but your comprehension level is beyond my control.

If you don’t understand what I just wrote, I could rewrite it but again, well…

RJW

#9 Please do.

But your argument comes up short in presntimg those exceptions, varibles, or considerations as all it does is simply states that you do in fact agree with me about Palin (yeah, but) yet all you have to rebut is a reminder of your hatred of Obama.

Not a model of coherence, grammar, or spelling, is it? Or does my singular lack of comprehension blind me to such brilliance?

Sarah Palin’s remark was about”terrorists.”
The funny (ironic) thing is that it is THE LEFT that is suddenly presuming that ALL TERRORISTS are Muslims.
What about all those Christian terrorists who need water boarding?

@Nanny G:

What about all those Christian terrorists who need water boarding?

You make it sound somewhat like a child needing a spanking.

So, are we to water board to deter terrorism or do we do it to extract information from terrorist? Previous arguments from the right led us to believe not only the latter but that water boarding wasn’t torture. If it isn’t torture, that undermines your “need to water board” theory.

You folks indeed talk in circles.

@Ronald J. Ward:

To add to my argument that you shoot from the hip with hatred rather than substance, you actually called him uneducated.

I’m afraid that that’s just not the case, Ronald.

The Collective often confuses brilliance with agreeance. Drones believe President Obama to be brilliant, because he says all of the demented things they’re thinking. So of course they think he’s brilliant, because they agree with each other. Unfortunately, brilliance or lack thereof is not dependent on agreeance. The Collective also confuses it’s heavy handed political indoctrination on today’s campus’ with a true education, which of course are two entirely different and separate things.

Clearly though, this just isn’t the case. President Obama is easily one of the most ignorant and misguided human beings to have ever walked the face of the Earth. After all, it should be remembered that as a professor, Obama taught the tenets from one of Alinsky’s books, that would more accurately be titled, “Rules for Retards.” It doesn’t get more uneducated than finding value in Alinsky. At the end of the day, thinking people recognize that only an uneducated person subscribes to Keynesian redistributionism. This is a man, who has never run any kind of private business at any point in his life, yet seemingly knows all about how businesses ought to operate, presumably based upon the things that he and his colleagues in academia made up. Only a truly uneducated person, or as some might say “useful idiot,” entertains or embraces tenets of Marxism. Obviously today’s professorship is evidence of this.

@MAKAYA:

Not a model of coherence, grammar, or spelling, is it? Or does my singular lack of comprehension blind me to such brilliance?

RJW is likely borderline schizophrenic and this has been discussed elsewhere. He routinely responds to points that no one makes, and is unable to process information that runs counter to the narrative that the Collective has assigned to him. Clearly he’s suffering from some kind of dementia, perhaps Asperger’s Syndrome.

@Kraken:

To add to my argument that you shoot from the hip with hatred rather than substance, you actually called him uneducated.

I’m afraid that that’s just not the case, Ronald.

This may come across as anger which isn’t my attempt but I really don’t know much other way of dealing with blatant stupidity and abject denial of reality.

I’m afraid that is that case as it says it right there in black and white. @Kraken:

Yeah, but look at the uneducated Marxist piece of garbage occupying the White House now.

What the hell do you call that?

Once again we see the same damn sock puppet tactics, saying something that’s in black and white and then denying what’s right in front of you.

That seems to be the norm of the average kowtower here. What the hell is wrong with you people? Can you not even read what you wrote?

Again, not anger but I just don’t know how to communicate with people that can’t keep track of their dishonesty from one comment to the next.

@Ronald J. Ward:Kraken is an advocate of home schoolin–er schooling.
Obama’s Columbia and Harvard degrees are worthless.
I better shut up. He may counter with “W” and the value of his 2 Harvard degrees. He’d have a point.

@Ronald J. Ward:

you actually called him uneducated.

technically he is. There is no record of him attending or graduating from any school after high school. If you want to claim there is, supply a link to a photocopy of a diploma.

@Ronald J. Ward:

sock puppet

tell us again, what the OFA definition of sock puppet is.

@Kraken:

Is it true that cannibals don’t eat clowns because they taste funny?

That’s certainly true of the humerus bone.

Part of what Ms. Palin was doing was to get just a reaction just like we are seeing from RJW here. And he bit down HARD. The laughs are flowing.

Sometimes the left is just like Pavlog’s dog.

@Ronald J. Ward: Which would have been ten times better than what we got instead!!

@Redteam: You are correct. As I noted in Dr. J’s post ‘W” was in fact a Yalie. He was prez. of Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity–fondly known as drunken Dekes–I was a brother at Colgate. He was also a cheerleader.

MAKAYA
HI,
the reason he cannot answer is because he is a nominal nonentity,
he only come to expectorate his QUE,
no question is reaching it,
BYE

Rich (W): we can only hope…
BEE: nominal nonentity? May I use that?
Rich (tco): Oh no!, You think?

MAKAYA
he , THAT RICH, is surely one of us, he behave like a CONSERVATIVE, which mean he is intelligent,
BYE