Critical Race Theory as a Leftist Hammer

Spread the love

Loading


 
By Ned Ryun

You have to hand it to the Left: they are relentless and always at war on a thousand fronts. As my father once told me when he was in Congress, “The shame is our people come and go, while evil never sleeps.” As I have pointed out, leftists are on the level of religious zealots; politics and government are their religion, the vehicle by which perfection and utopia will be achieved in this world.

The worst that can be said about many on the Right, however, is that they are just careerists. Most are nine to five types on weekdays and politics is not a religion for them. They consider politics a necessary evil. So if it seems like the Left is always on the move, it’s because politics is a lifestyle for them and they fully intend to reshape this country into their vision for it, everything else be damned.

Roots in Cultural Marxism

One of the vehicles with which they intend to achieve this transformation is critical race theory (CRT). As the 1776 Report noted, CRT is not a new or even a recent concept. Though it has captured the imaginations of many because of the way it has taken root in everything from inclusivity training to cancel culture, more people need a primer for understanding how CRT will be used in all the Left intends to accomplish.

The genesis for undermining the American Republic really started in the early 20th century with European thinkers, prominently Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci, who argued that the focus should “not be on economic revolution but instead on taking control of institutions that shape culture.” He argued for creating a counterculture to subvert and destroy the “established order.” If that reminds you of Marxist ideology, it should. It is Marxism, but through the back door instead of through violent revolution.

Many of America’s Marxist thinkers realized the majority of the white working-class was not going to answer the call of a global revolution so instead, the Marxists had to control the institutions that shaped society’s thinking. That’s how we got the un-American Left’s long march through our institutions.

In short, the poor peasants’ thinking needed to be molded so that they would understand how the world worked (at least according to these Marxists).

Gramsci’s work would be a major influence on the “Frankfurt School,” which, building on Gramsci’s thinking regarding institutional control as the vehicle by which to overthrow the established order, formally developed Critical Theory, the social philosophy that societal problems and oppression stem more from flaws at the societal level than at the individual level.

This idea was transported to the United States when Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt School immigrated here in the 1940s and became the intellectual godfather of American identity politics. Once in this country, Marcuse focused on “instigating cultural conflicts around racial identity.” But it was not until the 1970s that CRT really became an explicit theory. Derrick Bell, the first tenured black law professor at Harvard, fleshed out critical theory into critical race theory arguing that everything should be seen through the lens of race—arts, institutions, law, everything. Therefore people can choose to accept or reject anything based on whether they believe it is racist or not.

Social Justice as Deity

Today CRT is the worldview of many on the Left, almost to the point of a religion where the deity is “social justice.” This religion has the Oppressed and the Oppressor—the Elect and the Unelect as some have described it—all based on the color of one’s skin.

But in this story, there is no redemption for white people; they can never be “saved.” They will always be the Unelected because they are white. Whites will spend the rest of their lives apologizing for being born white and never truly be forgiven for that grievous sin. But more importantly, whites must submit to whatever the Elect wants because, well, they are irredeemable, deplorable white neanderthals.



But we must understand the ultimate end they seek: Gramsci wanted to overthrow the established order because of his Marxist beliefs. Out of that thinking would eventually come critical race theory, which prompts people to believe they can choose to reject anything as illegitimate if they can tar it with racism. Thus the founders, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution are illegitimate because they are tainted with the stain of racism. If you believe all of that, your “religion” compels you to reshape and reimagine the entire country and its society.

There really is a fusion of Marxism and Progressivism on this point.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Swing that hammer, Lefties!

Because of authorities following critical race theory instead of science, I (white & over 70) will be allowed to wait and watch to see how POC react to these new “vaccines” for covid 19.
The Websters Dictionary just changed the definition of what a vaccine is to accommodate the RNA fiddling done by this covid shot.
Here was the old (up until February 5th, 2021) definition:
comment image

And here is the new definition:
comment image

The new vaccines now tamper with the mRNA in your body so is it really accurate to call them vaccines?
This is an entirely new biological pathway to viral defense with no long-term data, so is it really ethical to treat it as though it is identical to the previous methods used for so many years for which there is already data?

I’m kind of glad people of color will produce the early data as to how this affects the HUMAN* body.

*HUMAN, all people of any age, of any shade from albino white to ebony black.