Conservative anger growing over Obamacare decision

Spread the love

Loading

I ran into a prominent conservative member of Congress Friday night just before the huge storms moved through Washington.  He was, he said, far angrier on the day after the Supreme Court Obamacare decision than he had been the moment he learned Chief Justice John Roberts had joined the Court’s liberal bloc to uphold the individual mandate at the heart of Obamacare.  He didn’t resort to histrionics or profanity, but he was spitting mad — and his anger was growing, not diminishing.

A short time later, I saw another conservative lawmaker who said much the same thing.  And yet another conservative leader who was in the same frame of mind.

At the same time, a backlash was forming in response to analyses by some formidable conservative writers — George Will, Charles Krauthammer, and others — who argued the Obamacare decision was actually a victory for conservatives because it placed a limit on expansive interpretations of the Constitution’s Commerce Clause.  In the Wall Street Journal, Berkeley law professor and former Bush Justice Department official John Yoo called such silver-lining analyses “hollow hope” and wrote that Obamacare is precisely the disaster for conservatives it appears to be:

The outer limit on the Commerce Clause in Sebeliusdoes not put any other federal law in jeopardy and is undermined by its ruling on the tax power…Justice Roberts’s opinion provides a constitutional road map for architects of the next great expansion of the welfare state.

Early polling also shows signs of increasing intensity among conservatives and Republicans in the wake of Roberts’ decision.  In the first survey since the ruling, Gallup found that Americans are split down the middle — 46 percent to 46 percent — on the question of whether they agree or disagree with the Court.  But when asked what should happen next, significant differences emerged.  Sixty-five percent of Democrats said they want to see the law kept in place and the government’s role in health care expanded.  But 85 percent of Republicans said they want to see Obamacare repealed either in whole or in part.  It’s possible that in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling, a long-running trend in opinion — that Republicans dislike Obamacare more than Democrats like it — will become more, not less, pronounced.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

How could anyone tell? Anger seems to be the right’s normal emotional state.

@Greg:

Really, Greg? Anger is the stalwart of conservatives? Shall we compare the TEA Partiers to the OWS crowd, with all its rapes, murders, et al? Shall we compare the shouting of the left in Congress to the rationale of the right side of the aisle? Anger, Greg? Saul Alinsky wrote the book on the use of anger. And he’s your guy, not mine.

Correct…and his book’s dedicated to who?

Ofraud tells us that health care is ‘too high’ so, he forces all of us to buy it…

@retire05:
Well said!
Greg seems to troll; he’s so cocooned in his bubble, never contribute to a thoughful comment – it’s always about refusing to rational thought.
If conservatives are so angry Greg, why are you coming to this site so frequently? Would it not be better to go to your homies blog and discuss your opinion?

Anger is growing because Roberts violated his oath to uphold the constitution, something we care more deeply about than the left – it’s an anger of disappointment and hope, because the ultimate institution – The Supreme Court – has caused great damage to us ‘We the People’!

The ultra-right wing thinks the Constitution is so simple it can be read and comprehended by a child—to quote another conservative site on which I blog. One of the principle duties for which the Supreme Court was established was to interpret legal documents, like the Constitution. Unlike modern day ultra-conservatives, the Founding Fathers realized that the English language is, by its very nature, vague and ambiguous, and subject to interpretation. I also that most of the Founders also realized—as opposed to the minority of religious radicals in their number, who believe in the literal interpretation of bible (including the age of the earth and the story of all the species in the world, according to Noah)—believed that the Constitution was not ordained by god, and must be interpreted in light of future circumstances. Sometimes your views win out, sometimes they don’t. Get used to it.