by Sundance
In Bridgeport, Connecticut, State Judge William Clark has thrown out the results of the September Democrat primary election and ordered a new primary to be scheduled and conducted [Court Order Here]. The issue was ballot harvesting and ballot fraud – both violations of state law.
The Judge reviewed CCTV footage showing Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member, working to support the party approved candidate. Both Ms Geter-Pataky and Ms Martinez participated in absentee ballot fraud, ballot harvesting and ballot stuffing at drop boxes. Both women invoked the Fifth Amendment when confronted as witnesses by the judge.
BRIDGEPORT – A judge ruled on Wednesday to overturn the city’s Democratic primary election, initially won by incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, following claims of absentee ballot fraud by his opponent, John Gomes.
After two weeks of evidentiary hearings for Gomes’s absentee ballot fraud lawsuit, Judge William Clark ordered a new Democratic primary based on 180 pieces of evidence presented by Gomes’s legal counsel.
In the 37-page ruling, Clark said the video footage presented by Bill Bloss – Gomes’s attorney – was particularly alarming.
“Mr. Ganim was also correct to be ‘shocked’ at what he saw on the video clips in evidence that were shown to him while he was on the witness stand,” Clark wrote. “The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.
Ganin was one the many city officials called to the Fairfield Judicial District Superior Courthouse for questioning, along with Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member accused by Gomes of stuffing ballot dropboxes.
At the witness stand, Ganim told the court he was “shocked” by an 18-minute video – subpoenaed by Gomes from Bridgeport police – that appeared to show 12 instances of Geter-Pataky either depositing stacks of ballots herself or handing ballots to others from behind her reception desk, and four instances of Martinez dropping off ballots.
Asked about the footage during the hearings, both Geter-Pataky and Martinez asserted their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination . Ganim, who appeared to win the primary by 250 votes after a count of absentee ballots, denied any involvement in the alleged fraud. (read more)
You don’t need to guess the ideology of the ballot harvesting participants. You know.
Well, it looks like even the democrats are finally admitting there is election fraud. Sorry greggie, you are wrong again? (Actually, greggie has proved to be wrong on everything he comments on!)
Dems were the only ones running.
Dems on both sides got caught cheating.
Dems even were the ones who caught them cheating.
Dems will win anyway.
Interesting. This video captured using similar techniques employed in the documentary 2,000 miles was found to confirm fraud. But, in 2,000 mules it was not fraud because a democrat won in a stolen election over a republican opponent.
Must be some sort of law the judge use to determine fraud vs non fraud.
The MAJOR difference is that the judge actually agreed to SEE the evidence, something most judges presented with cases after 2020 refused to do. See the evidence, see the fraud.
Wait… what? A judge actually looked at the evidence of election fraud presented and…. and…. and… SAW the election fraud? What a novel concept! Thank God the one and only incident of Democrat election fraud ever happening was caught and addressed!
Oh… I declare this will be a Greg-free zone.
This is what happens when there actually IS credible evidence.
It didn’t happen in over 60 cases relating to Trump’s “massive election fraud” lie because THERE WAS NONE.
Three years later, and he still hasn’t produced any.
No, this is what happens when a judge does his job and actually HEARS the evidence. In case after case regarding 2020, judges, afraid of what they would see, refused to see any of the evidence and dismissed cases. But here, we have Democrats accusing Democrats and THAT makes a difference.
STATE FARM ARENA.
The “evidence” was so ludicrous it didn’t meet the minimal standards of admissibility. False news and social media conspiracy theories aren’t actually evidence, no matter how many people believe them. Actual courtrooms are not stages for populace politicians to perform their rally acts.
The only thing that made it “inadmissible” is that it proved Democrat election fraud.
I see Comrade Greggie is offering his legal expertise again.
What an idiot.
RNC Convention Webside
Comrade Greggie, shouldn’t you be more interested in the Democrat/Marxist convention?
Of course, you provide a link to a bogus website. It has nothing to do with the Republican Party or Republicans.
You’re really a piece of cr@p.
╭∩╮( ͡° ͜つ͡°)╭∩╮
FU back, Lenny.
Go out in the garden and Eat Worms you weasel
What is a “webside”?
Ballot stuffing like 2000 mules?
Of course like any total fool you believe everything you see on the fake news programs and what you read in the NYT’s daily rag