With the Republican presidential nomination still up in the air, the possibility of a brokered convention is looking increasingly likely. Under the party’s rules, the delegates won by Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and the others in the primaries and caucuses are obligated to vote for their assigned candidate only on the first ballot. If no candidate wins the required number of votes, the delegates can throw their support to anyone. There’s speculation that party insiders, unhappy with the current field, might float the candidacy of someone not now in the race, like New Jersey Governor Chris Christie or Jeb Bush.
While Christie and Bush might be fine candidates, perhaps the Republicans should consider a more inspired and game-changing pick: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Far-fetched? Maybe. But a Thomas candidacy would energize Republicans in a way that few other Republicans can and would steal tremendous media attention from President Barack Obama.
Unlike the flip-flopping Mitt Romney, Thomas is a true conservative who could appeal to all of the segments of the Republican coalition. Tea Partiers would see Thomas as one of their own. Not only has he been a consistent voice to curtail the power of the federal government but his wife Ginni, a Tea Party activist herself, has been a leader in the fight to repeal Obama’s healthcare reform law. Wall Street Republicans would be buoyed by Thomas’s opposition to environmental regulation and his free market philosophy. Blue-collar workers could embrace Thomas’s up-by-his-bootstraps story of rising from incredible poverty–until he was 7, his home had no indoor plumbing–and his votes to end affirmative action and preserve the Second Amendment. Evangelicals will like that he’s against abortion, gay rights, and limits on prayer in school.
Thomas is also very smart. When he first joined the Supreme Court, some people thought he would just mimic Justice Antonin Scalia, the intellectual leader of the Court’s conservative wing. Over the years, however, Thomas has become a powerful voice for his brand of constitutional conservatism and has proven himself a more devout believer in originalism than even Scalia. Today, it seems as if Scalia is more likely to follow Thomas.
Interesting premise. I can’t see it happening, but it is fun to think about.
One problem with that suggestion. Clarence Thomas would have to resign from the Supreme Court, before the inauguration, leaving Obama free to appoint a far-left ideologue to replace a supreme court seat currently held by a conservative.
Bad idea.
I’d rather have Justice Thomas exactly where he is. Opposing the two liberal/progressive judges on the court that Obama gave us is better accomplished by someone like Thomas who is as close to an originalist as one can find.
I love Justice Thomas and know he would be one of our greatest Presidents of all time, but we simply can’t afford to lose him from the high court. Perhaps it will happen one day. If we can ever get another true conservative in the White House, maybe the court will be able to pick up another to allow Thomas to run, but not now. As hard as it was for him to overcome the racists and liars from the left to get confirmed, coupled with the fact it’s a lifetime appointment, I doubt he would want it anyway. The way they treated him was despicable and no way for any citizen of this country to treat another. To this day, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, et. al. continue to deride his intelligence when none of them are worthy enough to clean his shoes.