Charles Grassley: When the FBI Finally Produced the Document Alleging That a Burisma Executive Paid Off Joe and Hunter Biden $5 Million Each, They Redacted the Claim That the Executive Has Recordings of Calls With Both

Spread the love

Loading

by Ace

Recordings made for “insurance purposes” — in other words, for purposes of blackmailing the US “president.”

A few days ago it was revealed that these recordings exist.

But that didn’t come from the redacted version of the document that the FBI produced.

The FBI hid the fact that the “president” is now highly blackmailable by a Ukranian with ties to Russian intelligence.

That doesn’t protect “sources and methods.”

That just protects the Democrat the FBI worked so hard to “elect.”

Grassley: FBI Redacted References to Recordings in Biden Allegation Shared with Congress

Last week, I came to the Senate Floor to give a speech about the Biden Justice Department and FBI playing games with the American people by hiding the FBI-generated 1023 document from Congress.

Director Wray was going to be held in contempt for refusing to produce the 1023 that I told Chairman Comer about. Then, instead of contempt, the FBI committed to showing the 1023 and related documents to Congress.

So, the FBI showed but didn’t provide possession of that 1023 to the House Oversight Committee last week.

As the public knows that 1023 involves an alleged bribery scheme between then-Vice President Biden, Hunter Biden and a foreign national. The same allegations that Chairman Comer and I made public on May 3 of this year.

And on the same day that the FBI provided a redacted version of the 1023 to the House Oversight Committee, the Justice Department announced that former President Trump had been indicted and charged with 37 crimes relating to his alleged mishandling of classified records.

Attorney General Garland signed off on prosecuting Trump for conduct similar to what Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton engaged in. Two standards of justice in this country will turn our constitutional Republic upside down. Thanks to the political infection within the Biden Justice Department and FBI, we’re well along the road for that to happen.

This senator will do all that he can to fight that political infection. And you fight it by bringing transparency to what the government does. The public’s business ought to be public. Transparency brings accountability.

With respect to the 1023 shown to that House Committee, from what I’ve been told by folks who’ve reviewed it, it’s filled with redactions. So, Director Wray placed redactions on a document that’s already unclassified.

More than that, the FBI made Congress review a redacted unclassified document in a classified facility. That goes to show you the disrespect the FBI has for Congress. On a previous time on the Senate Floor, I asked my fellow senators what’s so unusual about an unclassified document being given to the public, when on May 18 of this year, there was leaked to the New York Times a classified document and even the name of a confidential human source. So, we’re kind of in a strange situation here. A classified document can be leaked to the New York Times, but an unclassified document can’t be made public to 300 million Americans.

Accordingly, Congress still lacks a full and complete picture with respect to what that document really says. That’s why it’s important that the document be made public without unnecessary redactions for the American people to see.

Let me assist for purposes of transparency.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Grassley says “the FBI made Congress review a redacted unclassified document in a classified facility.” So why didn’t Congress hold the FBI in contempt? GOP is run by pussies.

They are the same as Dems.

Uniparty.

More than that, the FBI made Congress review a redacted unclassified document in a classified facility. That goes to show you the disrespect the FBI has for Congress.

That goes to show that the document is terribly damaging to the idiot Biden regime and the FBI is engaged in an effort to cover that fact up. Why would the FBI redact the fact that audio recordings of Hunter and idiot Biden getting the bribes exist? The FBI of ALL people should understand the process of someone asking questions they probably already have the answers to; Grassley and Comer have already seen the full document (though, unlike garbage like Schiff, they haven’t leaked it) and know all the details. All the FBI has done is exposed its subservience to idiot Biden and his treasonous corruption.

Imagine the lightning quickness these documents and recordings would have been dumped on the public, bypassing everyone else, if it was Trump and Trump Jr. getting the bribes. The 1023 would have been sent to the NYT, WaPo and CNN before the ink was dry and there would be an ABC special for all 17 of the tapes. But, when it is idiot Biden and the Democrats involved, the FBI suppresses, then redacts the information and the Ministry of Propaganda goes full radio silence on perhaps the most explosive story involving a US President since Kennedy was assassinated.

Look for, in the future, an accusation of just that against Trump. If the Democrats follow their usual pattern, they commit the crimes first to see how bad they look in the light of day, THEN accuse Trump or some other prominent Republican of committing that crime.

Gosh, it would be a terrible shame and a “threat to democracy” if the 1023 and those recordings got accidentally “leaked”.