by Ace
I could swear this was a Conspiracy Theory That Would Get You Deplatformed just last week.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Wednesday said younger males should consider waiting longer between doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in order to reduce the risk of a rare form of heart inflammation.In an update on its website, the agency suggested an eight-week interval between the first and second doses of a primary mRNA vaccine schedule.
The “mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective at the FDA-approved or FDA-authorized intervals, but a longer interval may be considered for some populations. While absolute risk remains small, the relative risk for myocarditis is higher for males ages 12-39 years, and this risk might be reduced by extending the interval between the first and second dose,” the agency said.Whoops!
Whoopsie!
How long has this been denied for?The CDC cited studies in adolescents and adults showing the small risk of myocarditis associated with vaccines might be reduced and peak antibody responses and vaccine effectiveness may be increased with an interval longer than four weeks.”Extending the interval beyond 8 weeks has not been shown to provide additional benefit. There are currently no data available for children ages 11 years and younger. Therefore, an 8-week interval may be optimal for some people ages 12 years and older, especially for males ages 12–39 years,” the CDC said.
Well since we’re still learning about this vaccine, and we have no data for children under 12, we definitely should go forward with plans to vaccinate all children between two to five, who have no risk from covid whatsoever.
Don’t be too upset, though. It’s not personal.
The CDC just makes it a habit of withholding all important data from you.The CDC has been withholding large portions of COVID-19 data from the public.The New York Times reports that the CDC has published only “a small sample of the data” because it fears the public would not properly understand the data, that the public is too dumb.
“The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective,” the Times reports.
In other words, if there’s proof that the vaccines against COVID are less effective than promised — as each triple-vaxxed COVID positive individual proves — you don’t deserve to know about it. So don’t ask.
Among the hidden data points are the hospitalization rates broken down by age and vaccination status, in addition to the effectiveness of booster shots. Just the important stuff.
Two weeks ago, the CDC published the effectiveness of boosters in adults younger than 65. Yet that information did not include tests among adults ages 18 to 49, the group least likely to benefit from booster shots because the first two doses left them well-protected.
When Kristen Nordlund, a CDC spokeswoman, says the public would “misinterpret” this data, she means the public would see how the CDC is lying to them. That cannot happen.Say — withholding data about the efficacy of boosters among young adults…? Would that include young males, the same group at elevated risk for myocarditis…?
I sure hope the CDC wasn’t hiding data that showed that the vaccine wasn’t doing very much to protect young men from covid, at the same time it was also withholding data showing that the vaccines were increasing the risk of myocarditis in young men.
But I’m sure they wouldn’t have done that. I’m sure they wouldn’t have withheld data which would permit people at very low risk for serious covid harm from making rational choices about their own health, just for purposes of supporting a politically-decided vaccinations-at-any-cost propaganda mission.
Right?67 While absolute risk remains small, the relative risk for myocarditis is higher for males ages 12-39 years, and this risk might be reduced by extending the interval between the first and second dose,” the agency said.
Is this supposed to be reassuring?
Posted by: Jordan61Shut up and take your Science Pills, peon.
I’m pro-vax but I’m now wavering some. And I am more committed than ever against vax mandates, and the government, or corporations, telling citizens what they must inject into their bodies.
Below, Sagar and Krystal say something crazy-naive about the CDC’s mission being to “inform the public,” not lie to it.
In fact, the CDC’s mission is entirely about lying to the public.
I’ve told this story so many times you’re probably sick of reading it. During the ebola outbreak, Obama, the International Cosmopolitan, decided he would not ban travel to the West African countries where ebola was breaking out.
That would be privileging American lives over African ones, which is not something an American President should do.
[the_ad id=”157875″]
Therefore, Tom Frieden, then the head of the CDC, was sent out to Reassure the Public that The Science (TM) supported this policy. Remember, at that time, this was a political hot potato, because people wanted the borders closed until the outbreak was over.
To support the president’s political choice, Frieden straight-up lied in an interview with CNN’s Sanjay Gupta, claiming that ebola could not be spread by a sneeze, because ebola was not “airborne transmissible.”
Gupta probed him on this, trying to get him to change his story, because he knew Frieden was misrepresenting the medical facts, but Frieden clung to his politicized lie.
Ebola is not, in fact, airborne transmissible, but that is a doubletalk distraction, because a sneeze is by definition not an example of airborne transmission, but an example of direct contact, and yes, ebola is very much transmissible by direct contact, as by a sneeze. (I think one of the spread in the US was through a sneeze.)
But Frieden lied because… oh, what excuse would he give? What would Francis Collins or Fauci or Rachel Walenski say…? Because he didn’t want to “confuse the public” with “scientific details that would mislead them,” so he offered a “simplified version of the truth” that would “steer them to the right conclusion.”
Next conspiracy theory um spoiler alert Fauci hospital protocol is premeditated murder, or the jabbed are shedding the disease.
We can live with this disease, we need to focus on mandates, passports and chips that can be programmed to carry the jab status and other stuff the NWO needs to use, to track compliance.
AKA slavery.
https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/10/exclusive-80-of-the-most-common-adverse-events-reported-after-covid-19-vaccination/
It took years, more than a decade, to prove the leaders of the global warming research was completely faked.
Michael Mann (the hockey stick guy) is still trying to fight his losing battle.
The CDC and FDA and Post Office and other acronym federal orgs are colluding to prevent anything but the gov’t/media narrative from being published.
Unfortunately for them other governments and independent researchers are crunching numbers and testing out alternative treatments.
Then they publish their results, forcing the feds to ”lead from behind.”
Individual states took the lead, the real lead, well before the feds loosened up on their mask mandates.
What was “dangerous misinformation,” just days and weeks ago is being accepted as fact even by the CDC.
There happens to be a nasal treatment that KILLS covid and all viruses while it is still in the nasal area, before the body can be compromised. Countries like India, Israel, Thailand, Bahrain and Indonesia are using this.
A new vaccine is being manufactured, but not in the USA, that is a classic style vaccine, based on a killed virus, not on mRNA and spike proteins.
Meanwhile CA tries to criminalize doctors for even speaking outside the “approved gov’t narrative.”
Seems there are no allowable 2nd opinions anymore.
It took years and hundreds of millions of dollars for special interest propagandists to CONVINCE YOU that it was faked. Global warming is real, and accelerating, and anyone paying attention to reliable, factual news outlets is beginning to see the evidence in more than charts, graphs, and computer projections. Recurring uncontrollable wildfires are now the norm. Extreme weather is increasingly common. Methane is being released from beneath permafrost that’s no longer permanent. Tropical disease vectors are moving north, along with pine beetles that are already destroying the forests of central Europe. At this point, humanity is probably screwed. Disaster will arrive before fusion power can turn up to save us. The wealthiest will flock to their little lifeboat enclaves like on Soylent Green. Somebody back then had a crystal ball. Or maybe they were just paying attention during their early 1970s science classes.
Denial is a very widespread adaptation these days. There’s an increasingly long list of Obvious Things, Totally Denied.
Like idiot Biden, like the leftist media, like the Democrats, climate change is BULLSHIT.
Sure guy.
Shall we recall climate gate? The 2009 leak of emails showing climate scientists faking climate data. Do you believe in faked data?
Here’s an oldie but a goodie. My favorite part is seeing NY going under water. I wonder how they are getting along now submerged.
How about that 97% of scientists.
That’s just one of many places one can find the 97% discussed.
After hurricane Katrina we were told it was a sure sign of climate change. We would see more hurricanes, more severe and more frequent. Then we went more than a decade without severe storms of the Katrina severity and frequency did not rise. Another false prophecy from the climate mongers. History is full of failed climate predictions. Funny how no one in the legacy media revisited that claim. No sense in reminding people of a failed narrative and prophecy.
If the earth is too warm today, what is the correct temperature?
If we do all the things YOU believe need doing to mitigate climate change what happens.
How much will the temperature drop? How long will it take? How much will the seas recede? How long will that take? What’s the average temperature drop per year going to be? What does the science say? What is the correct PPM of CO2 we should have? These are the what do I get for my money questions.
In the past has CO2 been higher than today? Answer yes. Up to 5000ppm and yet it was not warmer than today’s approximately 400ppm.
You might want to tell Obama not to build his new home so close to where it’s going to flood. I guess he didn’t get the news.
https://www.amlu.com/2020/08/22/president-barack-obamas-hawaii-beach-house-being-built-on-idyllic-site-of-magnum-p-i-mansion/
The science isn’t settled. Science is not about consensus. If you believe it is and is then you don’t know science.
“The agency has been reluctant to make those figures public, the official said, because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective,” the Times reports.
Hmmm. Really. Yet, they went ahead and provided all the OTHER data without worrying about “misinterpretation”. Seems only information about possible health risks are in danger of being misinterpreted, not information about how effective the vaccines are.
It’s pretty important that people trust organizations like the CDC. Democrats have destroyed that trust.