Catholic Bishops Oppose Compromise on Birth-Control Insurance

Spread the love

Loading

Catholic bishops said Friday night that they would not support the Obama administration’s proposed compromise on a controversial rule that requires most employers to fully cover contraception in their workers’ health plans.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which had led opposition to the regulation, issued a statement saying that they didn’t believe their concerns were addressed by a new policy offered by President Barack Obama on Friday morning to allow religious employers who object to the use of birth control to turn over responsibility for covering it to insurance companies.

Under the new policy, religious employers that don’t want to offer contraception could exclude it from their policies. Insurance companies instead would be required to provide access to contraception for plan participants who wanted it, without explicitly charging either the religious employer or worker.

The shift is intended to ensure that women working at religious hospitals, schools and charities who want to use contraception can obtain it in the same way as women who work for secular employers. It also means the cost of providing the coverage for those women is likely to be spread across all policyholders by insurers.

The bishops had earlier expressed cautious optimism about the announcement, saying that it was “a first step in the right direction” but that they would have to study it.

In their later statement, they said they still had “serious moral concerns,” noting that the proposal didn’t contain provisions for religious employers who self-insure, meaning the employer takes on the underlying risk of covering employees’ health care.

The bishops also said that the current structure of the proposal meant that if an employee and insurer agreed to add contraception coverage to a health plan, it would still be financed in the same way as the rest of the coverage offered by the employer.

“These changes require careful moral analysis, and moreover, appear subject to some measure of change. But we note at the outset that the lack of clear protection… is unacceptable and must be corrected,” the statement said.

The White House declined to comment.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

They rejected it because Obama’s so called “compromise” is nothing of the sort. The premium payers still end up paying for indirectly.

@Ditto:
I think everyone is missing a crucial point in this matter; one that will ensure it will not go away until the SCOTUS ruling. The WH showed its hand and they had a pair of deuces. The unrestricted power Obamacare gives the executive branch will not stand. And liberals need to understand that when a conservative takes the WH again, (and they will, maybe not this time, but they will) a conservative WH will be able to impose their will on the masses. If SCOTUS upholds this law, a conservative president can say insurance companies will no longer be allowed to fund abortion, contraception, or abortifacients. They will have a SCOTUS precedence to back them up.
Don’t think it can’t happen, Obama just proved it can. First he tells Catholics what they must cover, then backs down and tell insurance companies that provide for Catholic institutions that they will now cover abortifacients and contraception for Catholic institutions free of charge. FREE OF CHARGE.
I feel better about this law being overturned this summer than I ever have. Maybe we can have a real debate about healthcare and do it right. No more employer provided healthcare. Abolish one of the relics from wage and price controls. That would be a debate worth having.

I know this isn’t an Obamacare thread, per se, but this just piles on to the huge number of lies told during the healthcare debate.
Obamacare architect: Expect steep increase in health care premiums
http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/11/obamacare-architect-expect-steep-increase-in-health-care-premiums/