by Ace
Gee, could it be that these two paragons of manhood are upset by a woman praising manly men?
By the way: Look at what Candace Owens was criticizing when she made this statement.
But the Ambiguously Gay Duo just couldn’t let her insult to their (shriveled) manhoods stand.
There is no society that can survive without strong men. The East knows this. In the west, the steady feminization of our men at the same time that Marxism is being taught to our children is not a coincidence.
It is an outright attack.Bring back manly men. https://t.co/sY4IJF7VkK
— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) November 14, 2020
David French, who has previously expressed his support of gender-fluidity by praising transgender storytime hour at public libraries for very young children as a Blessing of Liberty (TM) , rushed to attack her:
It's so hard to take right-wing masculinity Twitter seriously after it spent four continuous years hyping a incompetent, cruel boy-child president as a culture war avatar. He dodged the draft. He serially cheated on and preyed on women, but tell us more about "strong men." https://t.co/VSPaZ5EiYg
— David French (@DavidAFrench) November 16, 2020
This mincing little bitch actually tweeted this out within hours of calling Trump a “boy-child:” More childish squeeing for a SuperFriends recut movie.
Glorious. https://t.co/oRygSL7VNT
— David French (@DavidAFrench) November 17, 2020
Jay Nordlinger took a moment from yapping endlessly about fashion and Broadway to stick up for non-traditionally-masculine men:
Everyone has his own idea of manliness and manhood. Millions think populist-nationalists such as Trump and Bolsonaro are "real men." You may have a different idea. Anyway, a potpourri of a column, with every item controversial. https://t.co/gCBiG4W0RO
— Jay Nordlinger (@jaynordlinger) November 16, 2020
This is from this effeminate twat’s breezy simperings:
I would like to bring up kind of an offbeat one: manliness, or manhood. A solid understanding of manliness. In recent years, people on the right have had some screwy ideas of manliness, equating it with belligerence and vulgarity.
It’s amazing how quickly political discussion can get sexualized. Express disapproval of Donald Trump and Trumpism, and you’ll get “Grow a pair!” etc. Many of us can testify on this score.
I said earlier this year that right-wing politics can seem an endless round of “Quien es mas macho?” (Who is more macho?) This was a sketch that Saturday Night Live had, eons ago.
At the dawn of the Trump administration, a leading personality on the right said, “The alpha males are back.” Other people are called ‘beta.’ Donald Trump is a real man, you see — an “alpha.” John McCain, Mitt Romney, and others are girly men, or “betas.”
What makes you beta, apart from genetics and your yearning to be held by Big Strong Arms, is your craven craving of approval from your peers.
It’s disgusting to watch “men” compete for Social Validation Points like eighth grade girls.
And that’s what they mean by “Grow a pair,” you ridiculous pansy. They mean, “Have the courage to stand alone without soliciting the approval of your leftist peer group.”
But you never will.
Skirts are fine if they are actually a kilt, if one of you girly men want to know what a Scott wears under his kilt go ahead reach for the hem and time travel to next week.
What the soyboy model is wearing aint no kilt. Vogue and Vogue teen have gone where no man should go. Not exactly duluths ballroom jeans and the ruffles could get dangerous on a ladder to clean the gutters, might get caught in the wheels of a creeper.
Keep in mind that the left has constantly worked to make our military less effective by turning it into a social club where every social group gets to play. It is more important to the leftists to allow gays and trans to have their “rights” in the military than being able to train as a cohesive unit and fight effectively.