Jim Hoft:
The Obama administration is going to offer the Iranian regime technical aid for its nuclear program in exchange for less jihad in the region. The move will put Israel in great danger.
The Jerusalem Post reported:
At a security conference in Munich, the two leaders met to discuss ongoing negotiations over the nuclear program— and that program only, according to American officials. But the warning from Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif underscored core motivations driving Western diplomats in the talks: The realignment of Tehran towards cooperation with Washington elsewhere in the region, from Syria and Iraq to Yemen and Lebanon.
That is a departure from their original goal, set explicitly at the beginning of negotiations, to dismember Iran’s nuclear program thoroughly and permanently.
Rare is Zarif’s acknowledgment of US influence in Iranian politics: The 1979 revolution, and the regime born from it, was a sweeping rejection of American involvement in Iran’s domestic affairs. Today, politics within the country fiercely debate whether to accept a nuclear deal— or any deal— with the government’s oldest foe.
But reports began surfacing last week that the Obama administration is offering Iran technical concessions on its nuclear infrastructure in exchange for Iran’s use of its leverage to tamper regional turmoil.
Meeting for over two hours with Kerry, Zarif said that discussions focused on how sanctions will be lifted once a deal is reached, and how many uranium-enriching centrifuges will remain.
Zarif also met with European Union high representative Federica Mogherini, who said publicly that the time was ripe to reach an agreement. The two acknowledged conversations went beyond the nuclear file and covered the conflicts embroiling much of the Middle East.
Three months ago Ambassador John Bolton said Obama was giving Iran, “An open path to nuclear weapons.”
Told you he was a muslim terrorist, and his hatred for Jews is astonishing. He will bury Israel for a high payment from iran.
Providing technical aid for its nuclear program in exchange for less jihad in the region will not happen. The fool demands entitlement but gives noting in return. Technical assistance will place a nuclear missile in Jerusalem in less than two years just about the time he leaves office and this country.
Best to monitor the Russification of the Balkan, it is occurring right under your nose
Iran can SAY it will tamp down jihad in the region, but it can no more succeed in that goal than Arafat could in the past, than Abbas can now or any other Muslim ”leaders” could in the past of can now.
The problem with jihad is its diffuse organizational nature.
Small groups can collude in private anywhere, plot, plan then execute in public not caring if they live or die afterwards.
Iran has no better ability to stop this than anyone.
One thing Iran can do is take over on the ground.
Obama is giving Iran a cleared path to establishing (or trying to) their own version of a caliphate across more of the ME.
That might be the plan.
But tamping down ISIS, al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Hezb’allah, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood and all the others will NOT happen.
“OK, OK, hang on, if you try to stop breaking my legs with your baseball bat, I will make sure you have Magnum in your holster, but please promise me you won’t shoot me with it. Deal.”
@Nanny:
Hard to argue against that one, Nanny. And yet, . . . what is the Soros/Jarrett/Obama gang really doing?
The Iranian leadership will NEVER, ever, change – they’re buried in religious ideology, just like you cannot change the mind of a socialist. They will only be removed by revolution, which many Iranians wish for.
I heard a complaint from an Iranian friend recently who said the Ayatollahs have their “eyes” distributed in North America, many actually spying on expatriated Iranians and reporting back to Teheran.
Considering obama’s track record for calming the waters, why would anybody be surprised if we get hit with a GIANT tsunami?
It is clear that at every turn Obama sides with our enemies. This is utterly insane, if true.
#5
obama has been letting us know who’s side he is on from the beginning. A few day after he got the democratic nomination to run for president the first time, he said he wants a national civilian security force that is as strong as, and equally funded as the military. Why would a president need such a CIVILIAN force, except to defeat the military? Can ANYBODY suggest a reason when such a CIVILIAN force might be necessary? Keep in mind that he said he wants it to be as large as the military.
Why not agree to bomb Israel for them?
Cut out the middleman.
That would make O the 12th Imam.
And the Ayrabs would. Wuv usn’s forever!
Just watch. It has gotta happen.
ValJar has got it on her list.
@Smorgasbord: He did make that statement. It is to control the masses. Obama has done nothing to twart Islamic terrorist during his reign and will not do anything. He will do nothing to slow Iranian nuclearization.
#8
“Obama has done nothing to twart Islamic terrorist during his reign and will not do anything. He will do nothing to slow Iranian nuclearization.”
As I have mentioned different times, a person tries to HELP those they support, and HINDER those they do not support. Look at who obama is HELPING, and who he is HINDERING and a neutral minded person can easily figure out which side obama is on.
With Iranian born Valerie Jarret as Obama’s chief adviser and assistant, Iran has a the most powerful and influential lobbyist ever firmly entrenched in the White House. Which makes it no surprise that Obama bows down to Iran’s demands while refusing to meet with Bibi.