Cristina Laila:
As Obamagate heats up, more and more people are admitting that they had knowledge of the wiretaps.
Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager, Robby Mook confirmed to Fox News that he had knowledge of wiretaps being used during the campaign.
Of course he knew; Hillary tweeted about the wiretaps one week before the election.
Fox News reporter:
“Today Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager told Fox he had knowledge of wiretaps being used during the campaign but he suggested they were targeted at Russian officials, not directly at Trump Tower.”
It’s funny to watch Democrats split hairs as they try to dance around the wiretapping scandal. It’s hard to believe that Mook really thought the wiretaps were meant for Russian officials when the entire reason for the wiretaps was to take down Trump – the man running against his boss, Hillary.
Well, as the screw turns, the truth comes out!
More clinton dirty work more reasons you can never trust a draft dodger ora wife of a draft dodger
Anyone that would run guns to Mexican cartels to weaken the 2nd Amendment or use the IRS to attack political opponents would certainly wiretap an opposition candidate. With his corrupt reputation it is up to Obama to prove he is guiltless.
Robbie mook
What’s a mook?
Entirely lawful FISA-authorized wiretap surveillance on foreign nationals who are known Russian intelligence contacts recorded multiple conversations where the other party turned out to be some high-placed person inside the Trump organization.
So, shall we just stick our fingers in our ears, put our hands over our eyes, zip our lips shut, and pretend that didn’t happen?
I don’t think so. Such inadvertently recorded conversations may not be inadmissible as evidence in criminal prosecutions, but that sure as hell doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be full considered in evaluating a public official’s trustworthiness, or considered in evaluating the existence and severity of a potential national security threat. Failure to take them into account would be just plain stupid.
For someone sworn to protection the security of the nation, failure to take them into account would arguably be criminal negligence, dereliction of duty, or possibly borderline treason. An investigation is not optional. It’s obligatory.
Graham ready to subpoena for Trump wiretap information
Please proceed, with all due haste. Pull that loose thread, and keep pulling until you get to the end of it. Let’s see what all unravels.