Berlin Speech: 200,000 for Obama in 2008; Only 4,500 Today

Spread the love

Loading

Scared Monkeys:

Looks like Obama has also lost that Lovin’ Feeling of the German people as well … Obama’s tried to “TAP” into Germany and fails.

The International rock star status of Barack Obama has gone the way of the do-do bird.  Remember in 2008 when Barack Obama spoke in front of over 200,000 people. Everyone fawned over the “Hope & Change” candidate. However, that was then, this is now and Obama experienced a far different experience this time.  As stated at the Weekly Standard, Obama spoke to only 4,500 people today in Berlin, Germany at the Brandenburg Gate. It would appear that the Germans have wizened up to Obama’s game. It was simply Barack Obama’s Spinal Tap moment. Not only does the emperor have no clothes, he also has no audience, influence or magic.

…Just curious, what was the point why Obama went to speak at the Berlin Wall? Could it have been any more weak? Could Obama have looked any smaller?President John F. Kennedy spoke at the Brandenburg Gate (VIDEO) following the Berlin airlift. President Ronald Reagan (VIDEO) made his famous “tear sown this Wall” speech there. Obama, well Obama spoke from behind a glass wall and just looked small. Just how “Lost in Smallness” could Obama be? Who on earth thought that having him speak here was a good idea? The visual of 200,000 vs. 4500 is simply embarrassing.

Before and after videos here

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

If I remember correctly, obama usually followed a concert or something else that drew a large crowd, and most of the people were already there. They just stayed around since they were there anyway. Smart move for the democrats.

One article I read said the 4,500 were INVITED. Does this mean many fewer would have shown up if they hadn’t been INVITED?

Hope and change, baby!

Tear down the barriers between peoples, Obama said…..from behind 8 inch panels of bullet-proof glass.
Towards the end Obama said his ideas about al Qaeda were ”evolving.”

Now, we (most of us, anyway) recall when Obama ”evolved” his view on gays…..his policies did a 180!
He went from being against gay marriage to for it, he went from dragging his feet for years on gays in the military to opening it to out of the closet gays.
Where will his policy about al Qaeda ”evolving” lead?
They SEEM to be his newest allies.
And, man!, they are the MOST tone-deaf allies an American president ever had!
As he reaches out toward them, they attack American interests, infidels and others.

al Qaeda is alive and well. Do not believe one word from that terrorist’s mouth, opie. Like the Klan, their power, political presence and money is growing.
The person you work for or with or socialize with could be a al Queda terrorist.
No joke!

CNN said that his speech was historic. I say its histrionic

@Nan G: #3
Could it be possible that obama is on THEIR side?

Russia: Nuclear cuts proposed by Obama will require factoring in other weapons

Russia says non-nuclear weapons must be taken into account if Washington and Moscow discuss further reductions in atomic arsenals.

President Barack Obama has said he wants U.S. and Russian nuclear stockpiles reduced by one-third, more than required by a treaty that took effect two years ago.

But Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told The Associated Press and Bloomberg news agencies Friday that talks on further nuclear reductions should also factor in new types of American weapons.

Those include so-called “prompt global strike” weapons that would let the U.S. strike targets anywhere in the world in as little as an hour.

More proof that the Russians plan to take full advantage of Obama’s extreme far-left agenda to demoralize and dismantle America’s military capabilities and turn us unto a sitting duck.

@Ditto: #7
I remember when obama was running for the presidency, he said he would get rid of the world’s nuclear weapons by reducing ours. Other countries would be embarrassed, and reduce theirs. We would all keep reducing them until they disappear. I had never heard of using EMBARRASSMENT as a weapon. For it to work, it would have to be weaponized embarrassment.

1st time, they were taken in by his BS.. like virtually all of Europe was. THIS time, they are aware it was ALL BS!!!
Fool me ONCE…….
the Germans didn’t go for TWICE.. like Stupid Liberals HERE DID!!!

The public complains of using animal for research and development-why not liberals and tree huggers?
Most lawyers would follow second choice..
That means opie, biden, clinton hagal, kerry, clapper, holder, reid, feinstein, polosi and ohio’s douche bag “boner” would all qualify.
Quick, notify the reasearch committees in the university, private and military sector that they now have unlimited access to new research animals.