Another "Devastating testimony" that is a damn joke.
"I thought"
"I Felt"
"POTUS didn't follow past protocol. Does he have to? Well no he's POTUS!"This clown needs to be brought up on an UCMJ Article 88 and court martialed.
— Roscoe B Davis🎖⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@RoscoeBDavis1) November 8, 2019
Yeah.
You’d think all these Deep State’rs believe that Obama set all policy in stone to never be messed with by any followers into his office of President.
It’s not true, tho.
Each and every President is allowed to set new, even opposing policy.
Look at 20 years + ago when Ronald Reagan roared, “Tear Down This Wall!” to the commies in East Berlin.
Two years later they did just that.
Ron Reagan went in opposition to every president who simply accepted the Berlin Wall as a given.
Proves he provided classified information to a spy. The spy then scurried off to Schiff with his findings. Schiff brought up the WB, aka spy, not Jordan. What a set up. Something tells me Solomans reporting about Ukraine was a bit too accurate and the vermin needed a ruse.
I guess it’s clear to see why Schitt doesn’t want the hearings open, fair and public. These “witnesses” are so weak and unsubstantial that they crumble under serious questioning. Schitt wants to feed them loaded questions with leakable answers. The truth of the matter is quite different from what the fabricated dialogue the Democrats want assemble to support their coup.
So, Vindman’s concern was asking a foreign country to investigate a US citizen? Well, if the crime occurred in the foreign country, who ELSE would investigate the US citizen, unless that country allowed US law enforcement to come in and run the investigation? I don’t read anywhere that Vindman was concerned a US citizen might have COMMITTED a crime, only that Trump asked for help finding out if one did.
Liberal putzes think they make foreign policy, not the President of the United States.