All Race, All the Time

Spread the love

Loading

In his column posted last night, New York Times editor Andrew Rosenthal asserts: “There is a racist undertone to many of the Republican attacks leveled against President Obama for the last three years.” Rosenthal maintains “you can detect the undertone in the level of disrespect for this president that would be unthinkable were he not African-American.”

Apparently, Mr. Rosenthal was out of the country during the Bush presidency.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Race will be one of 0-bama’s strategies in the next election. He certainly can’t run on the issues or his record. You will also hear the MSM keep asking why Mitt can’t win. Of course they have ignored the fact that he is polling very close to 0-bama and he isn’t even the nominee.

Perhaps Obama’s supporter, Andrew Rosenthal, would rather have Antony’s art of rhetoric and irony as seen in his “friends, Romans and countrymen,” speech in Shakespeare’s, Julius Caesar.

Brutus (think Andrew Rosenthal ) would only allow Antony (think all Republicans) to speak at all IF Antony does not put down the conspirators (think Obama and his Administration) who murdered Caesar (think the America Obama promised to transform).

Antony’s speech is wonderfully artistic and ironic as he skewers Brutus and the other conspirators with his faint praise and rhetoric.

Here it is:

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interréd with their bones;
So let it be with Caesar. The noble Brutus
Hath told you Caesar was ambitious:
If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Caesar answer’d it.
Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest—
For Brutus is an honourable man;
So are they all, all honourable men—
Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral.
He was my friend, faithful and just to me:
But Brutus says he was ambitious;
And Brutus is an honourable man.
He hath brought many captives home to Rome
Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill:
Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?
When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:
Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:
Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;
And Brutus is an honourable man.
You all did see that on the Lupercal
I thrice presented him a kingly crown,
Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?
Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;
And, sure, he is an honourable man.
I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke,
But here I am to speak what I do know.
You all did love him once, not without cause:
What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason. Bear with me;
My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,
And I must pause till it come back to me.

—Act III, sc. ii

@DrJohn, #3:

The difference is that thinly veiled or open disrespect for Obama’s person has come from a lot of people from whom we should be able to expect a much higher level of decorum; from elected officials and from prominent political commentators, for example. No elected democrat ever shouted out “You lie!” at George W. Bush from the floor of Congress in the middle of a speech. Few prominent elected democrats routinely displayed a high level acrimony regarding the person of George W. Bush. With Obama the hostility is oddly personal, just as it was personal with Bill and Hillary Clinton. The word “hate” comes to mind.

Disrespect shown by members of the general public is a different matter. Any crank can make an offensive comment, carry an offensive sign, or put an offensive image up on the internet. Cranks commonly feel compelled to do so.

@Greg:

No elected democrat ever shouted out “You lie!” at George W. Bush from the floor of Congress in the middle of a speech.

Uh, bullsh*t, Greg.

In 2004, Democrats delivered a “Chorus Of Boos” during Bush’s Bush’s State Of The Union when he called for renewal of the Patriot Act., according to the Washington Times.
In 2005, Dems howled, hissed and shouted “No!” when Bush pushed for Social Security reform in the SOU: “Foreshadowing the contentiousness of the coming debate, Democrats broke decorum and booed twice,” according to the National Journal.
At the time, CNN’s Bill Schneider remarked, “It was unusual. I had never heard it at least at that level before. The Democrats clearly were booing, heckling, saying no when the president talked about the crisis in Social Security.”

http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0909/Dems_heckled_Bush_but_Wilson_was_different.html

Did Rosenthal say “during speeches”?

No.

Yet Wilson was right. But then there’s this:


Reid called Bush “liar,” stood by comment

Stark calls Bush a liar on the House floor.

You’re breaking my heart, Greg.

@Greg:

Selective, or simply short memory.
And in pointing these egregious acts by elected democrats out I am not trying to make a case that, ”well, they did it, too!”
That is a fallacy, called tu quoque.
Rather this is simply meant to refresh your obviously faulty memory.
You do watch these State of the Union speeches, right?

In 2004, Democrats delivered a “Chorus Of Boos” during Bush’s Bush’s State Of The Union when he called for renewal of the Patriot Act.

In 2005 at the next State of The Union CNN’s Bill Schneider remarked, “It was unusual. I had never heard it at least at that level before. The Democrats clearly were booing, heckling, saying no when the president talked about the crisis in Social Security.”
See it here:

Guys, this was told to Greg before. He knows he’s lying, but all he cares about is spreading left wing propganda.

Reid didn’t shout that out that Bush was a liar during a nationally televised Presidential speech from the floor of Congress.

Until Tim Russert brought it up on Meet the Press, Reid’s comment was only known by way of an attributed quote that appeared in an obscure Nevada newspaper. I haven’t even been able to find out where and when the original statement was actually made.

Rather different situations, in my opinion. One is not the equivalent of the other.

@Greg:
Full transcript right here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6646457/#.TwVoSfJYXTo

Reid did NOT deny it, but openly accepted those were his words…..

MR. RUSSERT: When the president talked about Yucca Mountain and moving the nation’s nuclear waste there, you were very, very, very strong in your words. You said, “President Bush is a liar. He betrayed Nevada and he betrayed the country.”

Is that rhetoric appropriate?

SEN. REID: I don’t know if that rhetoric is appropriate. That’s how I feel, and that’s how I felt. I think to take that issue, Tim, to take the most poisonous substance known to man, plutonium, and haul 70,000 tons of it across the highways and railways of this country, past schools and churches and people’s businesses is wrong. It’s something that is being forced upon this country by the utilities, and it’s wrong. And we have to stop it. And people may not like what I said, but I said it, and I don’t back off one bit.

As a side note, Obama ought to listen to Reid:

SEN. REID: No. I hope we don’t have to go to war. As I said, Tim, I’d rather dance than fight. But people have to understand that the president controls the White House, of course. The House of Representatives, the Senate–if he wants to get something done, he has to come to us. We are constitutionally empowered by the Constitution to have certain powers that are inherent in this body, and we want to work with the president. But they can’t jam things down our throats. The American people wouldn’t want us to do that.

@Greg:

Bill Maher, the comedian-pundit, was having a conversation with John Kerry. He asked the senator what he had gotten his wife for her birthday. Kerry answered that he had taken her to Vermont. Maher said, “You could have went to New Hampshire and killed two birds with one stone.” (New Hampshire is an early primary state, of course.) Kerry said, “Or I could have gone to 1600 Pennsylvania and killed the real bird with one stone.”

New York comptroller, Alan Hevesi, spoke to graduating students at Queens College. He said that his fellow Democrat, Sen. Charles Schumer, would “put a bullet between the president’s eyes if he could get away with it.”

Betty Williams, the Irishwoman who won the Nobel Peace Prize, said, “I have a very hard time with this word ‘non-violence,’ because I don’t believe that I am non-violent. . . . Right now, I would love to kill George Bush.”

And don’t forget the film, Death of a President.