After Damning Video of Ballot Stuffing Goes Viral, True Warrior of the Constitution Georgia Governor Brian Kemp Finally Calls for Signature Audit After Refusing to Do So for Weeks

Spread the love

Loading


 
by Ace:

This corrupt sonofabitch.

“Our” party is one of incompetents, cowards, and simple grifters.

Put them all out of office and start over.



@kylenabecker
GEORGIA.🚨GA Gov. Kemp is calling on Sec. of State Raffensperger to call for a *SIGNATURE AUDIT* of votes.

Kemp appeared on The Ingraham Angle in the wake of damning security cam footage that showed poll workers in Fulton County illegally processing ballots with no observers.

So only in the wake of that video does he decide that it might be a good idea to bother checking of the signatures on the ballots even resemble those of the voters allegedly casting them.

The Secretary of State, however, is refusing to conduct the signature audit. He’s making up excuses.

Again.

Larry O’Connor had a good column earlier, in which he said, I’m not saying the Democrats rigged the election, but they took every single step you’d take if you wanted to rig an election.

This column does not in any way allege that Democrats, Joe Biden, the Mainstream media, Big Tech, or any other entrenched, left-leaning institution in this country rigged the 2020 election.

God forbid anyone would think such a thing.

If this column were to even come close to making such an assertion, it would be flagged, banned, and removed from social media platforms and other avenues of entry to this website in an effort to prevent the unwashed masses from informing themselves of the facts surrounding this past ballot process.

So, let us repeat: This column does not accuse the Biden campaign or the Democratic Party of cheating in the 2020 election.

Got it?

That said if they were going to cheat… here’s what they would have done.

First, they’d make sure that the voter rolls were full of ineligible voters. Deceased people, non-citizens, and people who have moved out of state would not be purged from the rolls, and there would be no mechanism in place to purge those ineligible voters.

Further, they wouldn’t have any preemptive check to ensure that only eligible voters registered in the first place….

Next, they’d modify existing election laws so that voters could mail-in ballots on a whim and not for a specific “absentee voting” reason. This way, in-person voting (the most secure kind of voting) would diminish, and mail-in voting (the least secure) would increase.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Deplorable Me, #49:

Election officials have denied that anyone was asked to leave the ballot counting area owing to a water main break. The story originated with a lawyer named Jacki Pick, a Trump legal team volunteer and aspiring conservative media personality, who claimed she had affidavits that this had occurred. When she was asked to produce the alleged affidavits by the Athens (Georgia) Daily Herald, she failed to do so. Have you seen them? Neither has anybody else. Like Rudy and the rest, she’s just saying things that she hasn’t support with a shred of credible evidence. The narration accompanying the video is based on nothing her imagination. It’s a load of conspiracy theory.

December 5, 2020 – Fact Check: Video doesn’t show ‘suitcases’ of illegal ballots in Georgia

@Greg:

Election officials have denied that anyone was asked to leave the ballot counting area owing to a water main break.

Oh… the same election officials that stayed behind after the counting was stopped and continued counting?

Poll observers in Atlanta were told to just go home… counting continued
https://www.theepochtimes.com/georgia-poll-observers-say-they-effectively-were-told-to-go-home_3605825.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-05-1

Huge spike in Biden votes in Georgia when most of the election workers were sent away due to a “water main leak” and then the counting of ballots stored under tables was begun
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/update-ruby-freeman-elections-supervisor-shaye-ross-strange-pass-also-caught-video/

Counting votes in Georgia routinely giving Trump votes to Biden, monitors limited to 1 per 10 tables

BREAKING: Project Veritas: Georgia Recount Auditors Call Multiple Ballots For Joe Biden That Were Actually Marked For President Trump (VIDEO)

How was that “Russian collusion” you believed so faithfully proven? Where were the affidavits for that? Where was the proof of that? Where was he evidence of that? You’ll believe anything…. unless it’s the truth.

@Greg:

What purpose do you serve on this blog?

Seems all you know how to do is be an apologist for the corruption you inwardly know happened.

And how do you feel about the FDA keeping the vaccines held back until after the election? Not a peep out of you on that, yet you accuse Donald Trump of killing people.

Mafia Dons had more honor than you do. At least they killed other bad guys. Your left wingers killed innocent Americans.

@kitt:

We have video of Ralph Jones taking time out to speak with Ruby Freeman while she was filmed counting ballots.

And neither one properly wearing their masks. Democrats should be outraged.

But, you know, Democrats always show such integrity and credibility that we should have no suspicions. Nothing to see here.

@retire05: Well, obviously, neither his nor AJ’s purpose is to answer simple questions, such as other than fraud, what was the purpose of making up a “water main break” episode in order to stop vote counting, chase everyone out, then when all the monitors were gone, resume counting votes secured under a covered table, which resulted in a MASSIVE SPIKE of Biden votes? I guess they are here to redirect our attention to constant lying about Trump.

@Deplorable Me: Gregs post This story is provided by FactCheck.org. https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/annenberg-foundation/summary?id=D000031561
So Gregs fact checker debunked as another democrat operative.

@kitt: Greg doesn’t care if it’s true or not. He only cares if it supports his bias. That’s why he doesn’t have an answer for my question because, other than fraud, there IS no answer.

Running an equal number of Trump and Biden votes through sequestered Dominion counting machines in Ware county, Georgia, Biden got 26% more votes

https://noqreport.com/2020/12/06/ware-county-tested-dominion-tabulators-equal-number-of-votes-yielded-26-lead-for-joe-biden/

@Deplorable Me: Getting closer to confirming these machines and software are foreign election tampering

BREAKING HUGE: Major National Security Issue Identified Related to China’s Connection to Dominion Voting Machines

@kitt: I didn’t think any voting machines were supposed to be connected to the internet or electronic communication. It’s like they INVITED interference and fraud.

@Deplorable Me: Obama lied when he said they were secure no shock in that

@Deplorable Me, #52:

Poll observers in Atlanta were told to just go home… counting continued

A careful reading of the observer’s affidavit reveals that they were not told that counting was ended for the day, nor were they told to leave.

Point #8 states counting slowed sometime after 10 PM. The supervisor then instructed most of the staff to go home, not all. In addition to the supervisor and Regina Wallace, two other employees remained.

#9 suggests there was something devious about Regina Wallace’s failure to tell them how many ballots had been counted. It doesn’t clarify whether or not Ms. Wallace even knew the answer. She may well not have known at that point, and been disinclined to state a number that would be taken as an official statement. When known, the official answer would be published on the website. That wasn’t evasion, it was fact.

#10 indicates that the observers decided to leave themselves after concluding they weren’t going to get a their answer. Nobody told them to go, nor had any official stated there weren’t ballots left out that needed to be run through the counter before the day’s activities concluded. The fact that two other employees remained behind with the supervisor and Wallace suggested there was still more to do before closing down at the end of the day. The explanation for sending most employees home might be as simple as a decision to pay overtime to two necessary remaining workers rather than to an entire roomful.

There were no “suitcase ballots”. What’s seen in that part of the security camera video has been fully explained, and the explanation is what most reasonable people would have concluded to begin with.

No official observers were run off because of a water main break.

If people want to see something sinister in every little detail, or to believe things that never even happened, no one can keep them from doing so. In this case they’re being strongly encouraged to misinterpret. That is purposeful manipulation, by people who are unworthy of the trust that’s been placed in them. It’s a betrayal. It’s pure treachery.

@Greg: Horse pucks the Braids lady made an announcement, even the film crew thought they were done and also left. She wouldnt provide them meaningful access nor information.CNN and other major outlets reported a water main break caused the early recess of ballot counting.
You look for any thread to grasp, the ballots should not have been counted by GA law without witnesses as a supervisor Braids lady knew that and willfully ignored the opened ballots on the tables and pulled out the rolling cases to process.
Where did those ballots originate from?
Where are the affidavits from Mom Daughter and Mayoral race seller?
Lead Stories claims it is funded by Facebook, Google, and ByteDance. The latter is the Beijing-based and China Communist Party-linked company known for TikTok. This seems to be foreign meddling.
I will believe my lying eyes where they broke the law willfully by talling ballots without witnesses.

Since president-elect Joe Biden will be be sworn in as our nation’s president on January 20th, and Trump’s powers will then instantly evaporate, I have no need to grasp for threads. Nor will I have any further need to think about all of the nonsense that preceded the moment.

Tomorrow, December 8, is “safe harbor day”—the final day that any state’s selection of electors can be legally challenged in court.

@Greg: You go with that brother there is no President elect Biden or Harris yet thats a media smoke screen. No dates for EC meeting are set in stone.

@kitt:

Clearly Comrade Greggie doesn’t know the difference between poll watchers and ballot counters.

But then, the only reason he’s here is to try to legitimize the election theft that has clearly gone on.

@retire05, #66:

The distinction is obvious. It also has nothing whatsoever to do with what I said about the affidavit: no election official told the observers to leave, and no one told them counting for the day was completely finished.

Just as the video doesn’t actually show what it’s claimed to show, the affidavit doesn’t actually say what it’s claimed to say.

@Greg:

A careful reading of the observer’s affidavit reveals that they were not told that counting was ended for the day, nor were they told to leave.

Um, yeah. I got a “fact check” on Facebook that cleared that all up. No, they were never “told to leave”. Instead, they were “told to stop working and come back in the morning.” So, that’s all cleared up… right?

That “fact check” PROVES you all KNOW denying the obvious and apparent fraud is nothing but BULLSHIT. You won’t answer questions, dodge the obvious evidence and come up with totally ridiculous excuses like that above to try and explain away a massive crime.

Of course, those “fact checks” aren’t meant to be read; they are merely intended to be attached to a story to give the impression of inaccuracy or false information. Just like Democrats indicting everyone in sight to make them appear guilty.

Fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud.

Tomorrow, December 8, is “safe harbor day”—the final day that any state’s selection of electors can be legally challenged in court.

Nope. Wrong.

CLEARLY, the water main excuse was used to get rid of observers and then the cheating MFers dragged out and began counting and duplicating all the votes they had stashed. No question. End of debate. Settled science.

@Deplorable Me, #68:

The bogus story is that the observers were told to leave. That IS NOT what the affidavit says. Moreover, the person making the statement only interpreted the supervisor’s verbal instruction to mean that all counters should leave. That interpretation is inconsistent with his own observation in the affidavit that two employees other than the supervisor and Wallace remained behind.

Read the affidavit yourself. It doesn’t matter what somebody on Facebook has to say about it.

Nope. Wrong.

Actually, I am correct. From The Congressional Research Service, October 22, 2020:

December 8, 2020: The “Safe Harbor” Deadline
The U.S. Code (3 U.S.C. §5) provides that if election
results are contested in any state, and if the state, prior to
election day, has enacted procedures to settle controversies
or contests over electors and electoral votes, and if these
procedures have been applied, and the results have been
determined six days before the electors’ meetings, then
these results are considered to be conclusive, and will apply
in the counting of the electoral votes. This date, known as
the “Safe Harbor” deadline, falls on December 8 in 2020.
The governor of any state where there was a contest, and in
which the contest was decided according to established
state procedures, is required (3 U.S.C. §6) to send a
certificate describing the form and manner by which the
determination was made to the Archivist as soon as
practicable.

If anyone is wondering how that’s relevant, look up “safe harbor day”. You should find plenty of articles.

The water main break story is a load of horse manure that originated with a Twitter post by Eric Trump. The leak occurred at 6:07 AM on Election Day and it was fixed within two hours. It had nothing whatsoever to do with the press and observers leaving.

@Greg: Yes, the water main story was a load of bullshit. No, it originated from within the State Farm center, everyone was told the counting was being shut down and they were told to leave. THEN counting resumed and the hidden ballots were dragged out and counted, many of them multiple times.

December 7, 2020 – Protesters gather outside Jocelyn Benson’s home, some armed, over the weekend

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is speaking out after dozens of protesters showed up outside her home on Saturday over the election.

The protesters went live on Facebook with people yelling “stop the steal” and urging her to come outside.

“Your neighbors will not get no sleep – you need to come out now!” someone yelled.

Lt. Mike Shaw from Michigan State Police said he believes some of the protesters were openly carriyng guns.

Benson said she and her 4-year-old son were finishing up Christmas decorating and about to watch a movie when the protests started.

The protests come days after the Michigan House Oversight Committee heard unverified and false claims about election fraud in the City of Detroit.

Attorney General Dana Nessel and Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy denounced the protest, calling it “mob-like behavior.”

Benson’s full statement is below.

“As my four-year-old son and I were finishing up decorating the house for Christmas on Saturday night, and he was about to sit down to watch How the Grinch Stole Christmas, dozens of armed individuals stood outside my home shouting obscenities and chanting into bullhorns in the dark of night.

I have always been an energetic advocate for the right and importance of peaceful protest as enshrined in the United States Constitution, however there is a line crossed when gatherings are done with the primary purpose of intimidation of public officials who are carrying out the oath of office they solemnly took as elected officials. The actions of these latest protestors are an extension of the noise and clouded efforts to spread false information about the security and accuracy of our elections that we’ve all endured in the month since the polls closed on November 3. Through blatantly false press releases, purely political legislative hearings, bogus legal claims and so called ‘affidavits’ that fail to allege any clear or cogent evidence of wrongdoing, those unhappy with the results of this election have perpetuated an unprecedented, dangerous, egregious campaign to erode the public’s confidence in the results of one of the most secure, accessible and transparent elections in our state’s history.The demands made outside my home were unambiguous, loud and threatening. They targeted me in my role as Michigan’s Chief Election Officer. But the threats of those gathered weren’t actually aimed at me – or any other elected officials in this state. They were aimed at the voters. Through threats of violence, intimidation, and bullying, the armed people outside my home and their political allies seek to undermine and silence the will and voices of every voter in this state, no matter who they voted for. Their goal is to overturn and upend the results of an election that are clear and unequivocal, and that 5.5 million Michigan citizens participated in.But their efforts won’t carry the day. Because our democracy is strong. The will of the people is clear. And I will stand up every day in my job for all voters, even the votes of the protestors who banded together outside my home. I began my career investigating violent neo-Nazi and white supremacist organizations throughout the country. A photo of Detroiter Viola Liuzzo, along with a replica of her Michigan license plate from the vehicle she was driving when she was murdered, hangs in my office. I am acutely aware of the risks borne throughout history of those working to stand guard over and protect our democratic process. Nothing about the incessant and graphic threats made outside my home, or those that flood my social media accounts, will deter me, my team, or the more than 1,600 election administrators across the state of Michigan from doing our jobs.

And that job is simple: to defend and protect every Michigan voter, their choice, and their votes. I will continue to guard every citizen’s vote because no matter how one voted or who they voted for, where they live, or what they look like, their vote is the lifeblood of our democracy. Ensuring it counts is central to our work as election officials. It’s in our oath of office, when we pledge to support the United States Constitution and that of the State of Michigan, both of which unequivocally and preeminently establish every citizen’s fundamental right to vote.

I have spent my career defending and protecting the right to vote of every eligible citizen. That commitment has never wavered, and it will not waver now. I will continue as Michigan’s Secretary of State, proudly protecting and defending every voter and every vote.”

@Greg:

The headline to your b/s article is misleading.

Quote:
“A local police chief said he also thought some of them were armed.”

He “thought” ? And how many localities were there since “a” local police chief had thoughts? Does the area Benson lives in have more than one Chief of Police?

And once again, you misread 3 U.S.C. §5. Where again did you get your law degree?

@Greg:

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is speaking out after dozens of protesters showed up outside her home on Saturday over the election.

I guess Democrats are reaping what they sowed, huh?

I have always been an energetic advocate for the right and importance of peaceful protest as enshrined in the United States Constitution, however there is a line crossed when gatherings are done with the primary purpose of intimidation of public officials who are carrying out the oath of office they solemnly took as elected officials.

Wow. There is almost as much hypocrisy there as there was voter fraud in Michigan. The time to oppose and denounce such behavior is when it begins, such as when Maxine Waters was openly calling for protests, intimidation and threats against anyone that opposes the Democrat agenda. Now, you’ll have to explain exactly why this is wrong, since you previously approved, supported and cheered it on when directed against Republicans.

Only when Democrats demonstrate THEY will respect civil rights and promote civility will it return. Think your spoiled-brat, inherently violent party can handle that?

@Greg: I read it it said the fat chick sent the workers home very clear, after they all cleared out the dude lied to the press about the water main break, they were told later the group continued counting and went back but they were already done breaking the law and gone.
We want the chain of custody for those illegally counted ballots so they can be examined. We know some dominion machines in Fulton county were given the “clinton treatment” against court orders. Both paper shreading and data shreading trucks filmed at the center.
2506 Felons
66248 Underage
2423 Not registered
1043 P.O. Box
4926 Registered After Date
10315 DEAD B4 Nov 3rd
395 Dual State Voting
15700 Nat’l Change of Address
40279 Crossed County Lines
Not allowed meaningful access to count or recount
Watch how reliable these scanners are with absentee to get all the cases completed they must have been pristine ballots. I can see her reset the machine before rescanning I reject this shows the ballots counted more than once.
https://79days.news/watch?id=5fcd5dc23cb31966a1b92ade

@kitt: You have to keep in mind that with people like Greg, zero evidence against Trump equals absolute guilt and a mountain of real, solid, valid evidence of voter fraud means… nothing.

In other words, leftists hate laws, justice and the Constitution.

Maybe we’ll see about “zero evidence” if Biden actually does what Trump only claimed he had done, and declassifies Mueller’s Russia investigation material. Biden might do that even if Trump pardons himself, just to establish what happened.

Arizona Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Election Challenge After Investigation of 100-Ballot Sample Finds 3% of the Ballots Were Deemed Fraudulent in Favor of Biden.

Ted Cruz said he will argue any supreme court case.
Ted 2024.

@kitt:

2506 Felons
66248 Underage
2423 Not registered
1043 P.O. Box
4926 Registered After Date
10315 DEAD B4 Nov 3rd
395 Dual State Voting
15700 Nat’l Change of Address
40279 Crossed County Lines

Where do these numbers come from?

@kitt, #77:

The Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to consider an appeal of a lower court’s dismissal of the suit, based on a review of the evidence already on record.

At issue are an estimated 103 votes. Biden won Arizona by over 10,000 votes.

12/07/2020 – Arizona Supreme Court Will Review Appeal In GOP Election Lawsuit

@Greg: ZERO evidence supporting ANY of your bullshit accusations. Even House testimony that Schitt withheld proves all of the people making the accusations knew there was nothing supporting the accusations.

Election fraud, however, has affidavits, video evidence, forensic evidence and historic evidence.

@Greg: It was a random sample that showed 3 out of 100 votes were fraudulent thats just 1 small sample. of 2 million cast in Maricopa county where zero people showed up for the Biden rally and a 96 mile long auto rally was formed with out Trump even present.
Not 103 votes math dude 3% found to be fraudulent.

@kitt, #80:

It was a random sample taken from duplicated ballots, not a random sample taken from all ballots.

Duplicated ballots were those which were made by poll workers from properly submitted ballots which could be read by a human being, but were damaged or completed in some fashion that rendered them unreadable by an automated scanning machine. Rather than disenfranchising all of the involved voters, election officials transferred the votes as cast on the original ballots to replacement ballots that could be properly scanned.

Kelli Ward has claimed that Trump votes were fraudulently changed to Biden votes in the process. The lower court noted that there was no evidence provided that any such thing had occurred. There was no legitimate reason to think that it had.

The sample found a small percentage of transfer errors, not evidence of fraud. That small percentage consisted of errors for or against both candidates. The overall percentage of errors in the sample was so small that it could have had no effect on the outcome of the election.

@Greg: The Supreme court of AZ wants a closer look than the lower court. Might be that observers were not given the ability of proper oversight. Im sure few the duplicate ballots are not the only issues that will be raised in the court. Perhaps the signature verification machine setting to accept any scrawl. Who knows?