A Damning Admission: Zelensky’s Call for Fresh Draft Reflects Grim Realities

Spread the love

Loading

by Simplicius The Thinker

Putin and Zelensky both made a series of interesting, contrasting statements. Zelensky’s PR team forced him to hold a town hall type presentation to buoy his sagging image, particularly in light of Putin’s recent high-visibility events of this sort.

The general direction is that Putin has been signaling more and more ‘realpolitik’ admissions of late. What with yesterday’s confession that he was ‘naive’ in the opening portion of his presidential career. This time he delivered some unfiltered and quite candid explanations for Russia’s involvement in Ukraine:


 
This likewise extended to what appeared as a frank admission that Russia will take what’s rightfully hers in Ukraine, and will no longer seek to appease the West. Any future negotiations will be done purely on the behalf of Russia’s interests:


 
Zelensky for his part finally officially announced that ~500k new men will be drafted:

 


 
But the news that shocked the world most was a figure floating around which stated Ukraine requires 20k men per month just for upkeep of losses, which would obviously serve to give us an indirect insight into their true casualties:

 
At first the 20k/month seemed unsourced as it wasn’t part of the official announcement for the new 500k mobilization.

However I dug around and found the source, which was Rada Deputy Maryana Bezuhla who, perhaps unwittingly, gave up a state secret in a post that was meant as a condemnation of Zaluzhny (he’s the one linked in blue at top):

 
Keep in mind a similar figure was reported many months ago, but this appears to be the first ever high level official confirmation from Ukrainian authorities. That means Ukraine is losing minimum 20k per month and needs this amount of mobilized just to keep at parity. This amounts to a precise 666 casualties per day, though she did mention the problem ‘growing in the summer’ so perhaps it’s meant to represent post-counteroffensive loss trends.

Then again, I’ve been posting the official numbers from Russian MOD on AFU’s manpower losses whenever I happen to see them, and they’re always roughly in that range.

Example of past month:

 

 
825, 605, 635, 695 men lost per day. It matches up with the 20k per month figure remarkably well.

Recall that at 20k a month, after about 22 months of war, they would be at around 22 x 20k = 440,000 losses, which is roughly where a lot of tallies peg them now. After all, Zelensky’s own announcement is for exactly 450-500k new men, as per the video I posted—so this would line up perfectly with how much they need to replenish.

Another corroboration is Budanov’s new video, which I posted last time, where he states that a steady 1.1M armed forces figure has to be maintained “at all times”—which tells us that Ukraine’s doctrinal principle is to always maintain the same equilibrium of men, which logically explains why 450-500k total losses would require 450-500k new men, as opposed to 500k new men for an ‘expansion’ of some sort.

I make this distinction specifically because Russia itself famously announced its own ~500k new enlistments for 2023, but these are precisely for an expansion of several new military districts, rather than to make up for losses like in Ukraine’s case. In fact, below you’ll see that Shoigu announced exactly this:

➡️Due to Finland’s NATO membership and Sweden’s imminent accession, the formation of the Leningrad and Moscow military districts continues.

In light of that, we have a slew of new videos pretty much confirming the insanely high losses. For instance, this AFU officer recounts how his battalion commander drove 350 Ukrainian soldiers to death in only 8 hours of time during a particularly hot fight:


 
350 dead in just a single battalion, in a single day, in a single tiny sector of the theater. It becomes very easy to imagine 600+ total daily casualties over the entire front.

Another Ukrainian soldier outright says they’re losing in every conceivable way:


 
Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

53 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Turn out the lights, the party is over.

Why are you gleeful about the idea of a sovereign nation being dismantled by our biggest adversary?

If it means war over and no more senseless death whooopeee!

Should the world have simply let Hitler take what he wanted in the name of ending the killing?

That also was not our problem until propaganda and bullshit pulled us into ANOTHER world war f’n democrats again.

Been saying this for some time. What happens when Zelenskyy runs out of bodies to fight? Ask for Americans?

a frank admission that Russia will take what’s rightfully hers in Ukraine

How is any part of Ukraine “rightfully” Russia’s?

comment image?801

Okay. If we’re going back that far, doesn’t the land you live on belong to Native Americans? Doesn’t Palestine belong to the Palestinians?

Yup Israel lost it to the Romans so lets give it to Italy.

If we’re going back that far, doesn’t the land you live on belong to Native Americans?

Well, clearly the land you live on belonged to Native Americans. When can we expect you to send your deed to the tribe that held it before the white guys took it away?

Doesn’t Palestine belong to the Palestinians?

I thought you “teach” history. What kind? The Howard Zinn kind?

There is, and was never a Palestine. It was a slanderous name the Romans give the Jews and Arabs that live in that region.

The proper name for them would be the Gazans, like calling someone a Californian. It’s a regional term. That land belonged to the Jews over 3,000 years ago when Arabs were nomads.

You are incredibly stupid. You should not be allowed near a school, much less inside of one.

When can we expect you to send your deed to the tribe that held it before the white guys took it away?

I’m not the one saying that Ukraine belongs to Russia because it was part of Russia four hundred years ago. That’s kitt. I’m just trying to figure out whether her position is consistent.

What does kitt’s position have to do with yours?

I don’t understand why you expect me to pursue a policy that I haven’t advocated.

The war was lost months ago, but the Marxist media continued to hide that fact to protect another Biden failure.

It would seem bidens strategy for Ukraine has been no better than his Afghanistan strategy.

John Kirby Denies Biden Regime Left U.S. Weapons in Afghanistan, Calls Accusations a ‘Fallacy’ and ‘Farce’ (VIDEO)

The stark reality is that Trump-puppeteered republicans intend to hand Ukraine over to a murderous Russian tyrant 3 months ahead of an election that could depose him, in order to discredit Joe Biden and restore their criminal cult leader to power.

Biden’s strategy from the start has been to deny Putin victory until a war-weary Russia finally removed him. It’s the only way to defeat a territorially aggressive nuclear-armed tyrant.

Unfortunately Biden’s success would be the end of Trump. Consequently Ukraine must be surrendered, and the geopolitical trainwreck that follows must be blamed on Biden.

Last edited 8 months ago by Greg

Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden’s one and only strategy is to get a lot of taxpayer money in flow so a large portion can be stolen by his corrupt family and other Democrats.

Biden’s strategy to deal with Putin’s territorial aggression and nuclear blackmail has been clear from the beginning, and consistently followed. Putin has been held at bay for 667 days.

You whine about dollars. Thousands of Ukrainian patriots have sacrificed their lives. You say it’s not our problem. Some of you have also said that Hitler was not our problem.

I said it, and he wasnt he was Europes issue. Imagine if diplomacy could have won, and we didnt have to rebuild europe$$$ Now money is again fed to the IMC not on science and engineering to advance humanity, where will the money come from to rebuild Ukraine?
Smash, rebuild smash rebuild. Figure out who gets rich off that you war monger.

Last edited 8 months ago by kitt

 Where will the money come from to rebuild Ukraine?

Ukraine has estimated gas reserves of 1.870 trillion cubic meters and is one of the world’s top agricultural producers. Why do you think Putin wants to steal it?

Ukraine has estimated gas reserves of 1.870 trillion cubic meters and is one of the world’s top agricultural producers. 

If that is reality and the case, then Ukraine doesn’t need our money, now do they?

If that is reality and the case, then Ukraine doesn’t need our money, now do they?

The question was where would the money come to rebuild Ukraine—after the war. In the middle of a war, the activities that bring in the money are halted or, at best, greatly reduced. Because of, you know: the war. Which is happening right now.

If the Russians go home, Ukraine can get back to being the breadbasket of Europe.

Well then let him rebuild Ukraine, reopen the Churches, have elections, and more than 1 media voice there, all things Zelensky the dictator has stopped.

So, it’s good for Ukraine to exploit their fossil fuels but bad for the US to?

Thousands of Ukrainian patriots have sacrificed their lives.

And hundreds of thousands of Americans have died from China produced, Mexican cartel facilitated import of deadly drugs into our nation. And you say nothing.

You say it’s not our problem.

Why is it our problem more than it seems to be the problem of the nations that border Russia but don’t seem to be willing to protect not only Ukraine’s borders but their own, as well? Aren’t you the same idiot that bitched for years about us going to war in Iraq and Afghanistan and how much it was costing us? Why, yes, yes you are.

Some of you have also said that Hitler was not our problem.

Name them and quote them verbatim.
But you won’t because you are nothing but a liar. A cheap liar. And a twofaced POS.
Why do you care more about Ukraine than you do our nation?

I am “some” he is a coward not to name me, Hitler declared war on the US a tiny country across a bid damn ocean, but the Democrat in the White House had to begin a 2 front war and have 286,959 US casualties, Our best young men.
Ukraine should do what the US did sell war bonds, ration, and fire up an industrial base, or surrender.

Ukraine should do what the US did…fire up an industrial base, or surrender.

The only reason the U.S. could “fire up its industrial base” during World War II is because we were protected by oceans in both directions—thus, our factories weren’t getting commandeered by Nazis or being reduced to rubble.

The Russians had to pack their entire industrial infrastructure on trains and haul it hundreds of miles across the country, out of the reach of the Nazis.

Ukraine has neither of those luxuries, and so it can’t just “fire up its industrial base.”

Sucks to be them they should negotiate peace.

Russia, Germany and Japan managed to maintain their industrial output. Germany had actually INCREASED output by 1945, despite the devastating air campaign.

Try again.

I explained about Russia in the comment to which you’re replying.

Germany was able to keep going because it was the country commandeering or berubbling the infrastructure of other countries.

Your assertion about Japan is either grossly ignorant or a plain old lie.

No, by 1945 Germany was fighting from Germany. They accomplished it because they did everything possible to maintain production. So, your remark that the only reason the US was so productive is because we were out of the war zone is not true.

If Roosevelt hadn’t aided Britain, all of Europe would have become a vast racist Nazi empire. The militaristic Japanese Empire would taken control of the Pacific.

Last edited 8 months ago by Greg

“Sucks to be them,” would, I’m guessing, be her response.

Name them and quote them verbatim.

It was kitt, in this thread, and she said it in response to a question I asked, which was “Should the world have simply let Hitler take what he wanted in the name of ending the killing?”

 Reply to  Michael

 2 hours ago

That also was not our problem until propaganda and bullshit pulled us into ANOTHER world war f’n democrats again.

Named. Quoted verbatim. Try again.

“Some” implies more than one. Where are the rest?

some

[səm]

PRONOUN

an unspecified number or amount of people or things:

Sounds like a plural definition “teacher”.
You see in Gregs political bigotry he thinks we are like Democrats mindless sheep with a single TV driven opinion.

Sounds like a plural definition “teacher”.

“Give me some of your sandwich.”

“Try to retain some shred of your dignity, kitt, by refraining from commenting on things you don’t understand. “

From your idiocy people or things:
People more than one, not a fraction
Things ending in S indicating more than 1

Hey where is that meat you were going to fill my house with?
Or was that just another one of your immature attempts at being intelligent.
Go make your own sandwich beggar.

Yet somehow I was able to use the word “some” two times in my response to you without either instance indicating or even implying plurality.

I was wrapping Christmas presents for my Grandchildren not watching hollywood propaganda fairytales. fa-lalalala lalalala.

Out of context to Gregs post.
Like most of your garbage immature.

Shorter kitt: “I’m proud of my crazy-ass take on a pivotal event in world history—an opinion so crazy that nearly all thinking adults in the modern world would vehemently disavow it!”

Go back to watching your stories.

Right. As opposed to, say, “kitt”. What is it with you gutless leftists, anyway?

What’s the gutless part? And what are you talking about, anyway?

Last edited 8 months ago by Michael

All that’s been clear is that Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden is a weak, incompetent criminal that Putin regularly takes advantage of and that none of this would be happening if Trump was President. Who has said Hitler was not our problem? Who? You just make shit up to try to justify your stupidity in your own mind.

Who has said Hitler was not our problem? Who? You just make shit up to try to justify your stupidity in your own mind.

It was kitt, in this thread, and she said it in response to a question I asked, which was “Should the world have simply let Hitler take what he wanted in the name of ending the killing?”

 Reply to  Michael

 2 hours ago

That also was not our problem until propaganda and bullshit pulled us into ANOTHER world war f’n democrats again.

It seems that you owe Greg an apology.

No, because he routinely makes up shit that justifies the stupidity in his own mind.

Correct.
Any lesser lefty who parrots the line that we should keep backing Ukraine is another useful idiot joe uses to continue to enrich his own family.

BTW, look at a search of Zelensky wants to join NATO and see how he’s wavered on that since joe took office.

Zelensky knows his people are in the meatgrinder because NATO membership is the Red Line Russia stated would not be allowed to happen.
Russia enjoyed a neutral buffer for years until joe’s crime family amped up the conflict as a way to get more money (from US taxpayers.)

If and when joe ends his lust for cash, this Ukraine/Russia conflict can end peaceably via mediation talks.

Without election fraud and Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden’s totally stupid energy policies and his incompetent withdrawal from Afghanistan, there would be no war in Ukraine. Ukraine is paying the price for installing a leftist puppet in the White House. It’s all on YOU and Democrats, scooter.

Ukraine latest — men aged 25 to 60 living abroad “to report for military service”

Last edited 8 months ago by TrumpWon