64 and Counting: The Courts Keep Kneecapping Trump’s Authority—Harvard’s Just the Latest

Harvard’s lawsuit against Trump Administration was predictable, as was its request for a TRO. Will a court blindly issue a TRO, given there is no immediate harm per the letter? Probably.

 
Here is entire docket.

Also of note is “merits”: Contrary to what headlines suggest, termination of status is based on failure to comply w/ “reporting requirements,” which makes it a diff. case than termination cause I don’t like your DEA policies. I need to review reporting requirements to assess.

BREAKING: Obama appointee Allison Dale Burroughs enters TRO against Trump Administration in Harvard case WITHOUT a Trump attorney even appearing in case. Yes, TROs can be ex parte BUT THIS IS NUTS because . . .

Harvard’s lawsuit against Trump Administration was predictable, as was its request for a TRO. Will a court blindly issue a TRO, given there is no immediate harm per the letter? Probably.

The harm is for the upcoming academic year–months away and the letter even gave Harvard 72 hours to comply and that time has not even passed. No reason court couldn’t have set afternoon hearing.

And at that afternoon hearing, Trump Administration could explain that there is no immediate impact so no need for TRO. Here’s letter:

What are we even doing here

 
LINK