2013 Was Not A Good Year For Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Climate Warming

Spread the love

Loading

Anthony Watts:

European Space Agency – CryoSat – Click the pic to view at source

Image Credit: European Space Agency – CryoSat

By WUWT regular “Just The Facts”

For anyone keeping track, 2013 has not been a good year for those who propagate the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) Narrative, also know by a litany of increasingly nebulous buzzwords including “Climate Change“, “Climate Disruption”“,“Global Weirding”, “Ocean Acidification”, and “Extreme Weather“. Regardless of efforts to nebulize CAGW to explain all forms of climatic and weather variation, in 2013 every loosely falsifiable prediction of the CAGW narrative seems to have failed. The apparent complete failure of the CAGW narrative in 2013 could make the most fundamentalist agnostic wonder if Mother Nature sometimes takes sides, aka the Gore Effect, but before we praiseGaia, let’s take a look at some CAGW predictions and the associated 2013 data.

Global Temperature:

“For the next two decades, a warming of about 0.2°C per decade is projected for a range of SRES emission scenarios. Even if the concentrations of all greenhouse gases and aerosols had been kept constant at year 2000 levels, a further warming of about 0.1°C per decade would be expected. {10.3, 10.7}

Since IPCC’s first report in 1990, assessed projections have suggested global average temperature increases between about 0.15°C and 0.3°C per decade for 1990 to 2005.” IPCC AR4 2007

“Gulledge says some current projections point to a rise in average global temperature of 0.5°C (slightly less than 1°F) by the year 2030.” National Geographic 2005

“Global temperatures are increasing” NASA 2009

Global Temperatures through November 2013 had not increased for between 8 years and 11 months to 17 years and 3 months. depending on data set and Remote Sensing Systems (RSS)  reached 17 years in October, 2013:
WoodForTrees.org – Paul Clark – Click the pic to view at source

17 years has significance because in this 2011 paper “Separating signal and noise in atmospheric temperature changes: The importance of timescale” by Santer et al., found that:

Because of the pronounced effect of interannual noise on decadal trends, a multi-model ensemble of anthropogenically-forced simulations displays many 10-year periods with little warming. A single decade of observational TLT data is therefore inadequate for identifying a slowly evolving anthropogenic warming signal. Our results show that temperature records of at least 17 years in length are required for identifying human effects on global-mean tropospheric temperature.

So during the “at least 17 years” “required for identifying human effects on global-mean tropospheric temperature” Earth’s Temperature has been flat/Paused, making it quite difficult to identify any “human effects on global-mean tropospheric temperature”, unless they are of a stabilizing nature. Also, in 2013 “The Pause” in Global Temperature finally received widespread media coverage, i.e.:

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We just hit the solar max of solar cycle 24, the next part is the solar min.

Solar activity affects weather. We have solar maximums and minimums with the ‘Little Ice Age’ being the most famous minimum. Before that we had the Maunder Minimum.

With weak solar activity, cold weather follows.

2008 – no sunspots observed on 266 days of the year (73%).
2009 – no sunspots observed on 317 days of the year (87%).
2013 – flash forward to the peak year of solar cycle 24.

Space.com:

The sun’s current space-weather cycle is the most anemic in 100 years, scientists say.

Our star is now at “solar maximum,” the peak phase of its 11-year activity cycle. But this solar max is weak.

After the maximum it enters the minimum part of the cycle, and if the max is weak and cold temps are breaking records…

This year: Antarctica Recorded Lowest Ever Temperature On Planet.
This year: 2,000 Snow, Cold Records Broken So Far This March.

Next solar cycle (iirc solar cycle 25 starts 2020) will be worst, if solar activity doesn’t increase.

All this was predicted by NASA in 2006:

May 10, 2006: The Sun’s Great Conveyor Belt has slowed to a record-low crawl, according to research by NASA solar physicist David Hathaway. “It’s off the bottom of the charts,” he says. “This has important repercussions for future solar activity.

If the trend holds, Solar Cycle 25 in 2022 could be, like the belt itself, “off the bottom of the charts.

The 11 year solar cycle is only part of a larger super-cycle.

The year 1810 was the last full calendar year without any sunspots being observed.

1816 is noted in historic records as the year without summer. Granted there was a huge volcanic eruption that year; but was that event a conciliatory data point for the warmest cult? Or did it exasperate the cycle?

I ask because coincidentally 1810 was a year which began a massive migration to America of Irish* and Germans because of crop failure. And incidentally, China had famines in both 1810 and 1811 resulting in a dozen millions deaths.

Climate records indicate that the decade of AD 1810–1819 including “the year without a summer” (1816) is probably the coldest during the past 500 years.

*Random Internet Quote: “There is only one reason for the potato blight. It is not a native plant to this continent and in cold wet conditions [a potato] is vulnerable to blight.

The results obtained for various tree-ring chronologies indicate palaeoclimatic oscillations in the range of the de Vries /Suess (∼ 200-year) solar cycles through the last millennium.

1810 + ~200yrs = ~2010.

The year 1810 was the last full calendar year without any sunspots being observed.

Solar activity is declining, we will see its trajectory next year.