[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gaHJz7qz4s[/youtube]
In Iowa, Gingrich branded himself as the positive campaigner. In Florida, he became the Mitt Romney bulldozer. For Super Tuesday, Gingrich is trying a new route: a $2.50 gasoline promise.
The Gingrich campaign rolled out a new logo and signs today: a gas pump with the price set at $2.50, with the Newt 2012 logo on the pump. He also promoted a new hash tag on Twitter: #250gas.
Gingrich has been pushing the $2.50 a gallon gas since President Obama’s speech on energy, saying he chose $2.50 “as a stabilizing price for capital investment reasons.”
“It could easily go down to $2 and here’s a fact, it was $1.13 when I was speaker, it was $1.89 when Obama was sworn in,” Gingrich said Monday in Tulsa. On Friday, Gingrich asked for attendees at his rally in Washington to “give a gallon of gas” to his campaign by donating $2.50 online.
…“After I came out with a program to get to $2.50 a gallon gasoline, Obama decided he had to make a speech on energy,” Gingrich said. “I really hope every American will read his speech in Miami. It is a very revealing speech. It is factually false, intellectually incoherent, deeply conflicted on policy and in some places just strange.
…“Our choice is between energy independence and never again bowing to a Saudi King; and $2.50 a gallon gasoline,” Gingrich said. “His side is a series of fantasies in which your tax money is thrown away on products that are not commercially feasible while you pay higher and higher and higher prices.”
Gingrich quoted Obama as saying, ‘High gas prices are like a tax right out of your paycheck.’
“So you can think of gasoline prices when you go fill up your car as the Obama tax,” Gingrich said. “This is the new Obama tax right out of your pocketbook; I’m just quoting the president’s own words.”
GEORGIA we love you for welcoming NEWT GINGRICH, our guy, that many here choose able to get AMERICA on her feet marching like the GIANTS WHO MADE THIS NATION GREAT, thinking great for that AMERICA INVINCIBLE from those who dared to hurt her people, these years last, by wanting to change her so beautiful and gracefully so tolerant and compassionate, they have transgress the laws of the LAND WRITTEN BY GREAT MEN SPECIALY FOR HER AND FOREVER, THEY HAVE HUMILIATED THESES
PEOPLE WHICH ROOTS ARE DEEP IN THE GROUND, THESE PEOPLE WHO SPILL THEIR BLOOD SINCE THE PAST CENTURYS FOR AMERICA THEIR BELOVED COUNTRY, THEY HAVE OPEN DEEP RIDGES TO SEPARATE THESES PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL, THEY HAVE SOWN THE SEED OF HATE AMONG THESES
PEOPLE, and their times are counted for them to pay the measure of their transgression,
GO NEWT, WE HAVE YOUR BACK, GO GEORGIA YOU KNOW WHO IS THE BEST, TO TAKE AMERICA FROM THEM, AND RETURN IT TO THE PEOPLE
MATA
NEWT WON GEORGIA, A PROJECTION FROM FOX NEWS BRET BAIR,
@ilovebeeswarzone:
What gets me, Bees, is that our fellow Americans are happy as a stupid cow to have their national resources plundered by these corporations and sent to Brazil.
All in the name of some phoney religion. Free Traitors are just as bad as liberals with their inability to accept their failed policies.
There ya go again, Ivan. Pray tell, what “free traitor” agreement was involved with the approval of drilling permits in the Gulf by Obama?
Hint… none. The US has no “free trade” agreement with Brazil.
What Obama did do last March is to sign an expanded “trade and economic cooperation agreement [which] is ‘among the first steps on the road to a free-trade agreement’ “ last March, prior to the approval of their drilling permits. The summary of such is found on the Uruguay publication, MercoPress. I find no actual text on that specific agreement, which notes that more are to follow as it specifically relates to aviation energy.
It is, however, a bilateral expanded trade agreement with one of the Mercosur nations, required since nations would be foolish to engage in any trade based on a handshake and no criteria stated in a contract. That’s what I keep trying to say to you about trade agreements… it’s not that they are a bad idea. It’s the specifics within the agreement, if badly negotiated, that are detrimental. Yet to this day, you cannot point to any specific language or negotiated point in particular that has rocked your small world. Instead, if it’s any trade agreement, it’s bad in your opinion.
Well, feel free to find any of those specifics again… I repeat the offer of details and additionally, I’ve provided you the link (above) to all the US Free Trade Agreements in place. Pull out one of the unfair negotiation points, or ill thought out concessions, and you might find me in agreement…. or not. But unlike you, I do not blanket-ly dismiss all trade agreements as the devil. Trade with foreign nations is a fact of life and can be healthy for our economy, when negotiated properly.
Whether there are objectionable negotiating points in that US/Brazil trade and economic agreement last year, who knows? What it did was create another of those famous “commissions” to explore commerce and tariffs, while not obligating to anything specific INRE tariffs. And in case you don’t know, the removal of tariffs between signatory nations is the very definition of a “free trade agreement”… ergo, no tariffs, ergo “free”.
Brazil has been resisting any US overtures for a FTA to this date.
Therefore the permit approval to Brazil for GOM drilling did not require a FTA, nor is there one in place. Your “free traitor” tangent is a totally unrelated subject.
Do I agree with Brazil’s Petrobras getting that permit approval, when Obama was busy in permitorium for US enterprises? Hell no. I would have preferred a US E&P company had the gig, but I don’t know that anyone applied for that field. However that’s a different story than WTA.
IVAN
HI,
you have a good point with BRAZIL, a big point to my mind,
I’ll tell you what came to my mind, when OBAMA REFUSE THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE,
I remember that he had made a deal with BRAZIL, AND GAVE THEM A REAL COMMITMENT,
TO USE THEIR OIL, do you remember?
so most likely he is behind what is going on more than WALLSTREET he is the one responsible
for the umongoose DEBT which cause the BERNANKE AND GEITNER TO devalue the dollar,
AND no matter how they try to cover it or give it a different name , they are carrying the boulder chained to their ankles, and OBAMA STILL DOING IT AS WE SPEAK asking for more moneys,
the one only on paper now,
bye
See Beezy? He is suddenly silent once the challenge has been made.
anticsrocks
hi, this BRAZIL BUSYNESS is definitly involve in what is going on, and I think also
at the numbers at the pump, and IVAN put is finger on it too, and the more we digg in previous actions from the WHITE HOUSE, benefiting other COUNTRIES OVER THIS GREATEST AMERICA,
the more we see where their favorites are, which is not the UNITED STATES, and their way of thinking are that the people are too stupid to make the
arithmetic of 2 plus 2 eqhal transgression of their duty to favor AMERICA IN EVERY DECISIONS, THEY WHERE ELECTED FOR ONLY.
bye
MATA
GEEZ YOUR GOOD you can find a needle in a hay stack,
I remember also that he had a banker with him as it was said on where I read it,
he gave money to build the facility for the olympic in there sometimes later from that date,
and the talk was about oil drilling he would buy from them,
that’s what come back to mind why the banker following him,
Mata shoots. Mata scores.