Roe Is the Problem

Spread the love

Loading

by CHARLES C. W. COOKE

What do you think of the abortion law in Texas?” a friend asked me this morning.
 
I’ll tell you: I think that the question makes no sense. Properly understood, the abortion law in Texas is not really an abortion law, but a key designed to interact with one of the world’s most preposterous Rube Goldberg machines. What Texas has done is a response to what the Supreme Court has done, which is a response to what previous Supreme Courts did, which was a response to what even earlier Supreme Courts did. And all of it, right from the start, has been nonsense.
 



 
Which is to say that the core problem here is not Texas’s law, or the order it prompted, or the case law that it put at issue. The problem is Roe. The problem has always been Roe. It is not this or that law; it is not this or that precedent; it is not this or that state or legislator or governor. It’s not the trimester rule or the viability standard or the shift from strict to undue burden; it’s not the details that were presented in that case from 1991, or the circumstances in which that 2017 appeal was heard, or the judicial philosophy of the judges who heard that brief up in Pennsylvania; and it’s not this or that “ism,” either. It’s Roe. Because, legally, Roe has always been utter nonsense — and because, deep down, we all know it. In this country, there exist profound and sincerely held differences of opinion on the question of abortion — views that run from the insistence that all abortion ought to be banned without exception to the claim that abortion is a positive good that ought to be celebrated. But there does not exist a set of rival cases for RoeRoe is a lie, a contrivance, a calculation. It is a 50-year-old imposter that has distorted our fundamental law, corrupted our politics, and damaged our Constitution. It is a gremlin.
 
As the pro-choice legal scholar John Hart Ely noted a few months after the decision was handed down, Roe was indefensible in every conceivable way that a Supreme Court decision could be indefensible. From whole cloth, Ely wrote, Roe created a “super-protected right” that “is not inferable from the language of the Constitution, the framers’ thinking respecting the specific problem in issue, any general value derivable from the provisions they included, or the nation’s governmental structure,” and thus answered “a question the Constitution has not made the Court’s business.” Roe “is bad,” he concluded, “because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”
 

 
It is from here that all our subsequent problems have flowed. Roe was the spider, and the resulting litigation — DoeCaseyWhole Women’s Heath, and the rest — is the tangled web it has woven. Eventually, there will be no choice for the Supreme Court but to nuke Roe in toto, because there is no manner in which it can be plausibly amended, squared, resolved, or preserved. No further inquiry or inspired approach can possibly rescue Roe, because there was nothing to Roe in the first place. “One of the most curious things about Roe,” the pro-choice legal scholar Laurence Tribe has noted, “is that, behind its own verbal smokescreen, the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found.” Sometimes, there really is smoke without fire.
 
When backed into a corner, advocates of Roe and its descendants like to talk about “democracy.” This, too, is irrelevant. The United States Supreme Court is justified in striking down a democratically enacted law when, and only when, that law conflicts with a superior democratically enacted law: namely, the Constitution of the United States. If the Constitution prohibits that law, it goes; if the Constitution does not prohibit that law, it stays. Everything else is noise. The popularity of the two provisions in question is immaterial, as are the popularity of the Court, the reputation of the Court’s staff, the broader debates over the underlying political question, and the feelings of the public toward any relevant precedents. Roe could be beloved or detested or somewhere in between, and it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference, because the pertinent question is whether it is juridically correct. And it is not juridically correct. It is not even juridically debatable. It is tosh.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Since it is believe men can get pregnant, do I get to have an opinion on abortion now?

You have a right to conduct your private life however the hell you want. You have NO right to dictate how others must live theirs. Once you do, YOU become the tyrant. YOU become the Taliban. At that point, YOU can go to hell.

Oh… you mean OTHER than forcing people to wear useless masks or take a vaccine they don’t want?

No one forces someone to go out and get pregnant. I think the quickest way to Hell is to support killing babies to promote promiscuity.

greggie, your soap box is empty and starting to crumble on the corners. Hope you are making plans for your future while you still have a shred of sanity left.

So now children in Texas have a better chance at life. For you anyone who supports this is Taliban?
You are out of your pea sized mind. Next time you decide to post another inane comment, abort it first.
Maybe you need to take your mask off for awhile.
https://thefederalist.com/2021/09/02/a-look-at-scientific-evidence-suggesting-face-masks-damage-your-health/

2022 Democratic election meme:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D6uKeC2XoAAivSx?format=jpg&name=small

Gov. Abbott’s assistance is much appreciated.

Afghanistan.

Yep, that’s “the plan”, I’m sure. It’s been obvious for for a week. Unfortunately for “the plan”, one year from now Biden will be the guy who ended a 20-year war a year ago, and Abbott will be the guy who’s still angering women voters a year later.

Afghanistan disaster.
Border Crisis.
COVID19 resurgence (related to border crisis).
Economy.
Inflation.
Unemployment.
Energy.
Taxes.
MASSIVE deficits.

No part of US life has not been shit on by idiot Biden. Your lies about abortion don’t even begin to chip away at that.

Everything on your list is part of the Trump legacy, but you’re too stupid to understand that.

comment image

Actually greggie, this was all you and Biden Even CNN, MSNBS and the rest are now pointing to Biden. There is quite a lot of regret out there for voting for Biden. Only the most ignorant voters have not started to regret! Guess that includes you!

Nice try, crybaby. That’s idiot Biden’s disaster and that’s just in 8 months. Trump had them all in great shape and idiot Biden trashed it all.

Blame, blame, blame. Kinda hard to do when you hold all the power.

The Trump Legacy:

Four years talking about leaving Afghanistan, but not actually doing it;

Four years of pretending a 2,000 mile long fence would solve the problem of illegal immigration;

A year of telling people the COVID pandemic was no big deal and pitching bogus remedies, while resisting common-sense pandemic measures;

Four years of doping an already recovered economy with unsustainable tax cuts and suppressed interest rates so that the richest could grow even richer;

Which of course LED TO inevitable INFLATION, because that’s what happens when you simply print more money to cover deficits;

Huge, PERMANENT high-end tax cuts, when he was already running up federal debt FASTER THAN ANY PRESIDENT IN MODERN HISTORY, with ridiculous empty promises that the working and middle class’s cuts would at some point become permanent too;

Resistance to renewable energy programs, as if fossil fuels would last forever, while ramping up domestic fossil fuel production so that money could be made by EXPORTING resulting surpluses;

Four of climate change denial, with the western United States having increasingly massive wildfires every summer, and regional hurricanes and flooding becoming more severe with every passing year. (Maybe Biden should go to Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and New York to throw out some rolls of paper toweling.)

Not to mention the fact that this fraud-of-a-small-p-president promoted anger, hatred, and division to his personal advantage, flagrantly abused his official powers of office to commit and conceal his crimes, lied like a dog on a daily basis, and tried to overturn the election when a HUGE majority of American voters kicked his excessively HUGE butt out of the White House.

21 Quotes by Margaret Sanger that Will Probably Make You Sick

These quotes by Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, reveal the wicked roots of the abortion movement and expose the twisted mindset behind the present-day Culture of Death. In her own words, Sanger peddles racism, eugenics, contraception, abortion, while demonstrating a visceral hatred for children, parenthood, marriage and the Catholic Church.

If you want to open more eyes to the truth, please share these quotes far and wide. Only when the abortion agenda is fully rejected in our culture will America be ready to turn back to God.

1. “But for my view, I believe that there should be no more babies.”
— Interview with John Parsons, 1947

2. “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
— Woman and the New Race, Chapter 5, “The Wickedness of Creating Large Families.” (1920) http://www.bartleby.com/1013/

3. “We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population…”
— Letter to Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, December 10, 1939, p. 2
https://libex.smith.edu/omeka/

4. “I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan… I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak…In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.”
— Margaret Sanger, An Autobiography, published in 1938, p. 366

5. “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world, that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically… Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin—that people can—can commit.”
— Interview with journalist Mike Wallace, 1957

6. “The most serious evil of our times is that of encouraging the bringing into the world of large families. The most immoral practice of the day is breeding too many children…”
— Sanger, Margaret. Woman and the New Race (1920). Chapter 5: The Wickedness of Creating Large Families. http://www.bartleby.com/1013/5

7. “Eugenics without birth control seems to us a house builded [sic] upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit.”
— Sanger, Margaret. (1919) Birth Control and Racial Betterment. The Birth Control Review.

8. “As an advocate of birth control, I wish to take advantage of the present opportunity to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’ admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes.”
— Sanger, Margaret. (1921) The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda. The Birth Control Review, p. 5. http://birthcontrolreview.net/

9. “The most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”
— Sanger, Margaret. (1921) The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda, Birth Control Review, p. 5
https://www.nyu.edu/projects/s

10. “No more children should be born when the parents, though healthy themselves, find that their children are physically or mentally defective.”
— Sanger, Margaret. (1918) When Should A Woman Avoid Having Children? Birth Control Review, Nov. 1918, 6-7, Margaret Sanger Microfilm, S70:807.
https://www.nyu.edu/projects/s

11. “A marriage license shall in itself give husband and wife only the right to a common household and not the right to parenthood.”
— Margaret Sanger, “America Needs a Code for Babies,” Article 3, 27 Mar 1934.
https://www.nyu.edu/projects/s

12. “No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for parenthood.”
— Margaret Sanger, “America Needs a Code for Babies,” Article 4, March 27, 1934.

13. “Permits for parenthood shall be issued upon application by city, county, or state authorities to married couples, providing they are financially able to support the expected child, have the qualifications needed for proper rearing of the child, have no transmissible diseases, and, on the woman’s part, no medical indication that maternity is likely to result in death or permanent injury to health.”
— Margaret Sanger, “America Needs a Code for Babies,” Article 5, March 27, 1934.

14. “No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth…”
— Margaret Sanger, “America Needs a Code for Babies,” Article 6, March 27, 1934.

15. “Apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.”
— Sanger, Margaret. “My Way to Peace,” Jan. 17, 1932. Margaret Sanger Papers, Library of Congress 130:198. https://www.nyu.edu/projects/s

16. “… these two words [birth control] sum up our whole philosophy… It means the release and cultivation of the better elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extinction, of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”
— Margaret Sanger, “High Lights in the History of Birth Control,” Oct 1923.
https://www.nyu.edu/projects/s

17. “Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease…”
— Sanger, Margaret (1922). The Pivot of Civilization.

18. “My own position is that the Catholic doctrine is illogical, not in accord with science, and definitely against social welfare and race improvement.”
— Margaret Sanger, “The Pope’s Position on Birth Control,” Jan. 27, 1932.
https://www.nyu.edu/projects/s

19. “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class… Knowledge of birth control is essentially moral. Its general, though prudent, practice must lead to a higher individuality and ultimately to a cleaner race.”
— Margaret Sanger, “Morality and Birth Control,” Feb-Mar 1918.
http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sa

20. “Feeble-mindedness perpetuates itself from the ranks of those who are blandly indifferent to their racial responsibilities. And it is largely this type of humanity we are now drawing upon to populate our world for the generations to come. In this orgy of multiplying and replenishing the earth, this type is pari passu multiplying and perpetuating those direst evils in which we must, if civilization is to survive, extirpate by the very roots.”
— Margaret Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, 1922
https://www.scribd.com/documen

21. “Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives… If we are to make racial progress, this development of womanhood must precede motherhood in every individual woman.” — “Woman and the New Race,” 1920

Yeah, that’s what the left stands behind.

what is wonderful is that none of the ignorant, loudmouth, dolt snowflakes, millenniums or ass wipe zero generation were even alive when Roe vs Wade was reviewed by SCOTUS. in all of the major cities and towns in America illegal abortion clinics operated without impunity. Septic abortions were high and the outcome on a very septic patient was zero survival.
As for margaret sanger’s psychiatric stability-she need treatment now. demonstrates elements of a homicidal maniac-very sick woman. it was a shame that she was not aborted, but term delivery followed by strangulation or drowning, the common practice methods used to kill viable term infants. Note, when a nurse or a doc’ strangles or drowns a new born they make no sound-silence is all that is left as life leaves the body.

No wonder catholic bishops refuse to give biden communion. Seems as though he has strayed from the catholic doctrine

‘Devout Catholic’ Joe Biden Says Life Does Not Begin at Moment of Conception

Most Democrats are anti science.

Certainly anti-intelligence.

Remember Bill Clinton vetoed a bill to ban certian Abortions while having thousands of acres of land set aside as National Monuments and Rivers listed as Wild and Scienic the Draft Dodger put protecting inanimate Lands and Rivers more important ten the lives of the unborn