1. Bergdorf Goodman has no surveillance video of the alleged incident.
2. There are zero witnesses to the alleged sexual attack.
3. Carroll first came forward — conveniently — with the allegations while promoting her book What Do We Need Men For? in 2019, which featured a list of “The Most Hideous Men of My Life.”
4. Carroll was unable to remember when this alleged attack even occurred. She told her lawyer in 2023, “This question, the when, the when, the date, has been something I’ve [been] constantly trying to pin down.” She has jumped years — originally beginning with 1994, then moving to 1995, and even floating to 1996. She cannot remember the season in which the alleged attack occurred either.
5. The Donna Karan blazer dress she claims to have worn during the alleged incident was not even available at the time of her claims. Trump Attorney Boris Epshteyn told reporters, “She said, ‘This is the dress I wore in 1994.’ They went back, they checked. The dress wasn’t even made in 1994.”
“And that’s why the date’s moved around. This is the 80s. Is it the 90s? Is it the 2000s? President Trump has consistently stated that he was falsely accused, and he has the right to defend himself,” he added.
6. She never came forward with these allegations over the years despite constantly being open about sexuality, posting things that were very sexual in nature on social media — many of which Trump has shared. They include remarks such as “How do you know your ‘unwanted sexual advance’ is unwanted, until you advance it?” and “Sex Tip I Learned From My Dog: When in heat, chase the male until he collapses with exhaustion … then jump him!”
7. She said she was never raped, telling the New York Times’ podcast, The Daily, “Every woman gets to choose her word. Every woman gets to choose how she describes it. This is my way of saying it. This is my word. My word is ‘fight.’ My word is not the ‘victim’ word. I have not — I have not been raped,” she continued. “I have — something has not been done to me. I fought. That’s the thing.”
Eight more at Breitbart
The whole Jury in this case should be investigated and see where they come from and their political algence
Their bank accounts should be audited for any suspicious deposits.
If this was anyone but Trump, not only would this case be thrown out of court, no attorney would have even taken it. It is actual solid and irrefutable proof that these cases are nothing but political attacks.
The case was structured and planned to go after Trump. No case this bizarre reaches a trial level. Judges have discernment in cases and before wasting time and the public’s money will seek clarification from counsel and prosecution to go forward.
There must be some behind the scenes coordination to launch this frivolous attack.
We now know both the fat ass willis case and jack shits case have had WH involvement.
How many election fraud cases, backed by evidence, were refused on “lack of standing” or other excuses? The judges follow their political orders.
The whole statute that was created out of nothing, and was only articulated against one person, should be stricken as what it is.
It’s only in effect for 12 months…
Figures