Let’s talk about immunity, beginning with Obama


Oh my. Liberals haven’t thought this through at all.

There is a flood of limp wristed hand wringing transpiring among liberal circles following the SCOTUS ruling on Presidential immunity. They should be grateful instead, but they are short sighted and lacking in memory. Let’s have a look at the histrionics from a couple of left-wing Biden sycophants. First, the ever-hyperbolic Elie Mystal.

Well, yes. It’s been done. Barack Obama killed four Americans in drone strikes. No indictment, no trial, no jury of their peers. Just BOOM.

On Wednesday, the Obama administration publicly acknowledged for the first time that four Americans were killed in drone strikes since 2009 as part of U.S. counterterrorism activities surrounding al Qaeda . Of the four, only one of them, Anwar al-Awlaki, was targeted, according to Attorney General Eric Holder in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy. The following are descriptions of the four men killed in drone operations.

The other three- sorry about that!

One was 16-year-old Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, the son of Anwar Al-Awlaki.

He was killed at age 16 in a drone strike on Oct. 14, 2011, in Yemen. It, too, was a controversial extra-judicial killing. Some U.S. officials called it a mistake.

…He had no known ties to terrorism. Former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, stated that his death was justified, and that he “should have had a more responsible father.”

It was Biden’s FBI who was authorized to use lethal force when raiding Mar a Lago.

The current SCOTUS ruling protects Obama from prosecution. Anyone with half a bloody brain recognizes that were any President to attempt to have an opponent killed it would NOT be an official action.

Here’s the logorrheic Tristan Snell

Glad you brought that up, Snell.

Barack Obama’s administration used the IRS to target conservatives.

Biden sent the FBI after PTA moms.

Biden ignored Supreme Court rulings.

Biden pressured Merrick Garland to prosecute Trump.

And if he’s really of sound mind, Biden can be prosecuted for violation of the Espionage Act. He could be held as accomplice to murder for Americans killed at the hands of illegal aliens.

We can dig into that motive thing too.

The irony is so thick you need a machete to cut it. They have presented what they felt were their fears in an abstract sense but rather was a history of real democrat Presidential actions. If not for the current ruling, all of these actions would be fair game for prosecution by a Trump administration.

Liberals should be thanking SCOTUS for this decision.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

He had no known ties to terrorism. Former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, stated that his death was justified, and that he “should have had a more responsible father.”

Does that mean Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden can be drone-killed?

It wouldn’t be so much of a problem if Supreme Court Justices were investigated as long as ALL were investigated and treated equally. But, would Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden prosecute Sotomayor for taking $3.6 million from Penguin-Random House and then voting on a case involving them?

Immunity has nothing to do with Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden’s stealing classified documents case. He has none. So, he absolutely should be prosecuted, just as the left did Trump, and imprisoned (because there is no doubt he is would be found guilty). Democrats simply believe none of the rules apply to them so they don’t fear the onerous precedents they force to be established.

In reality Joe is already imprisoned,.. in his head . The only thing he lacks to be done to him is his charge . God will soon have that duty . Since it seems like our system can’t stomach to do it .

For a sec I though that half of the cover image was Clock Boy