Excuse me, but….

Spread the love

Loading

 

Fox News has suspended Jeanine Pirro for some comments she made about Ilhan Omar



Pirro suggested during her March 9 show that Omar’s religious beliefs were at odds with the U.S. Constitution.

“Omar wears a hijab, which, according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested.” Pirro said. “Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?”

Fox News condemned Pirro’s comments, saying it had addressed the matter directly with the host.

Pirro asked a very fair question. Sharia law is not compatible with the US Constitution.

This is self-evident in the fact that Islamic theocracy rules throughout the Islamic world, crushing human rights such as those delineated in our Bill of Rights. In some “secular” states like Turkey and Egypt, democracy is tolerated for Western acceptance, but trying telling a Coptic Christian in Egypt, for example, about the freedom of religion or try imposing aa government dictate contrary to Islam, the way ObamaCare imposes on pro-life Christians, on Muslims. Under Islam and Shari Law, there is no freedom of religion or speech and equal rights are forbidden to women and non-Muslims. If you should convert to Christianity, you have signed your death warrant.

And she’s right. Omar is the representative from ISIS. She is a cancer in the US House of Representatives.

But never mind that for a second.

Fox News suspended Pirro because she touched the third rail of political correctness- Islam. Why must she be punished for her criticism of Omar when left the wing media says the most stupid of things? I can think of nothing more stupid than calling Trump a “Russian agent.”

Margaret Brennan implied it.

Rachel Maddow said it.

John Brennan called Trump a “clear and present danger.”

Jon Meacham called Trump a traitor.

These are some heavy duty comments, especially since they are all based on the dossier hillary clinton and the DNC paid for with the sole intent of destroying Donald Trump. It was the FBI’s insurance policy to take Trump from office if somehow he was do the impossible and win the election.

And these are especially grievous comments once you know that Christopher Steele’s information came from a fake website.

Steele testified that he used a 2009 article from the crowd sourced news site CNN iReport, for instance, to check information he learned about Webzilla, one of the three related entities that had sued BuzzFeed for defamation. BuzzFeed published the dossier in full — explaining they hadn’t verified it — on January 10, 2017, after CNN reported that President Barack Obama and President-elect Donald Trump had been briefed about it.

When asked if he had an understanding of what CNN iReport was, Steele said he did not know. He thought the information on the site had “some kind of CNN status. Albeit that it may be an independent person posting on the site,” Steele said during the deposition.

CNN iReport was a separate citizen journalism initiative from CNN’s editorial news service that allowed users to contribute stories, photos or videos.

“Do you understand that they have no connection to any CNN reporters?” an attorney asked Steele during his deposition last June. “I do not,” he answered, according to the transcript.

The fake information from the fake website was used to secure a FISA warrant which was then used to attempt to frame Carter Page and George Papadopooulos as part of the effort to destroy Trump.

Excuse me, but why is Janine Pirro being punished for asking a reasonable question while the pretty much the entire left wing media is guilty of conspiracy to overthrow a duly elected President? What will the the punishment be for that?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Posted in Uncategorized
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments