Site icon Flopping Aces

Today is the hottest day in the history of the universe.


Today is the hottest day in the history of the universe. And so was yesterday. And the day before that. And the day before that.

The hottest day ever. The hottest week ever. The hottest year ever. Ever. Hotter even than the big bang. The picture above is allegedly the latest picture from NASA/NOAA showing the effect of global warming.

This is an extraordinary claim. As they say, extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. What is one to do so that one wants to make extraordinary claims and the extraordinary proof is how to come by?

One gets creative, and that’s what those rascals at NOAA/NASA apparently have done. First, we find out that NASA/NOAA recorded record levels of heat in Africa.

 

 

Thing is, NASA/NOAA doesn’t have any sensors in those areas

 

 

And the satellite data says something else:

 

This kind of  chicanery might lead a cynical person to suspect that this was being done for a reason. Apparently that’s not a far fetched notion.

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

This paper was nicknamed the “Pausebuster.” It was intended to be a political tool for obama and other leaders to use as a tool to bludgeon opponents of global warming and their ongoing globalization effort. The results of the study cannot be verified by someone else because NOAA couldn’t be bothered to archive them (i.e. the dog ate it):

NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data. After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.

The whole paper, the process and consequently the warming argument could properly be described as a clusterf**k.

 

 

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Exit mobile version