The Obama Administration and Justice Department (with the help of progressive big city Democrat “usual suspect” Mayors,) has unilaterally launched the Strong Cities Network, leaving Congress completely out of the picture.
Mayor de Blasio on Tuesday announced the city’s involvement in the program — the first of its kind — at the United Nations, along with U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
Paris, Minneapolis, Rotterdam, and Montreal are among the 25 cities around the world that have also signed up for the program — dubbed “Strong Cities” — which encourages participants to communicate directly with one another about suspicious activity while “respecting the fundamental rights of citizens.
De Blasio, speaking at the UN, said New York joined because the group will target “intolerance” and make the city safer.
The group will “target intolerance?” Now, why does that make my ‘spider-sense’ tingle?
“We will be vigilant against all forms of violent extremism, whether it’s based in religious, or racial, or nationalistic or ideological intolerance,” (de Blasio) said.
Against “Nationalistic and ideological intolerance”? Knowing how far-left globalist progressives think, this doesn’t sound so comforting.
“The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration, ” said Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch. “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”
“…to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.” Let that sink in.So logically, if something might interfere with or disrupt this planned “social cohesion and community resilience” the globalist progressives have in mind for you, the UN and Strong Cities Network will mobilize to crush it.
Who are these threats to the globalist-progressive’s “social cohesion and community resilience” This reminds me of the “threat” posed to the NAZI party, such as the Jews in pre-WW2 Germany. Will these include other “threats” such as Israel over in the Middle East? Christians who oppose abortion or gay marriage? Constitutionalists and Conservatives who oppose the socialist transformation of the US or global governance by the UN? Who will decide what is “extremism” and how it is to be fought?