Site icon Flopping Aces

Liberals don’t mind children dying – just not with assault rifles

Recently Obama played the guilt card in his campaign for gun control as he cranked up the tears.

President Obama made an emotional plea for Congress to pass gun-control legislation, telling the political world “shame on us” if it has forgotten the 26 people killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School less than 100 days ago.

“Shame on us if we’ve forgotten,” Obama said Thursday at a White House event where he was flanked by more than a dozen mothers whose children were the victims of gun violence.

The president paused for effect several times in his remarks, stating: “I haven’t forgotten those kids. Shame on us if we’ve forgotten.”

Characteristically, Obama reminds us that he might be the only person on Earth who hasn’t forgotten Newtown. Yet he might also have described those children as “fetus(es) outside of the womb” and there are a bunch of kids he seems to have forgotten about back in Chicago.

Exactly what age do children have to reach before they are no longer forgotten by Obama?

The Weekly Standard posted a video in which Planned Parenthood argues in favor of infanticide. From that video:

Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.

Alisa LaPolt Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

“So, um, it is just really hard for me to even ask you this question because I’m almost in disbelief,” said Rep. Jim Boyd. “If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that is struggling for life?”

“We believe that any decision that’s made should be left up to the woman, her family, and the physician,” said Planned Parenthood lobbyist Snow.

Rep. Daniel Davis then asked Snow, “What happens in a situation where a baby is alive, breathing on a table, moving. What do your physicians do at that point?”

“I do not have that information,” Snow replied. “I am not a physician, I am not an abortion provider. So I do not have that information.”

Rep. Jose Oliva followed up, asking the Planned Parenthood official, “You stated that a baby born alive on a table as a result of a botched abortion that that decision should be left to the doctor and the family. Is that what you’re saying?”

Again, Snow replied, “That decision should be between the patient and the health care provider.”

and then comes the hammer:

“I think that at that point the patient would be the child struggling on the table, wouldn’t you agree?” asked Oliva.

“That’s a very good question. I really don’t know how to answer that,” Snow said. “I would be glad to have some more conversations with you about this.”

Later another representative asked Snow, “What objection could you possibly have to obligate a doctor to transport a child born alive to a hospital where it seems to me they would be most likely to be able to survive?”

Snow said Planned Parenthood was concerned about “those situations where it is in a rural health care setting, the hospital is 45 minutes or an hour away, that’s the closest trauma center or emergency room. You know there’s just some logistical issues involved that we have some concerns about.”

Logistics.

In the warped Planned Parenthood universe “logistical issues” decide whether any effort ought to be made to save a life. (Think of the ramifications this could hold for Obamacare) Planned Parenthood loves abortion. It’s big business. They want to open abortion centers in schools and would open an abortion center in everyone’s home if permitted.

Here’s the video:

But that thing- logistics- I know I’ve heard that before.

While in the Illinois state legislature, Barack Obama voted against saving abortion surviving babies four times.

As can be seen on the vote docket, Obama first voted to amend SB1082 to add the “neutrality clause” from the federal version of Born Alive to the IL version to make them absolutely identical. (DP#1 means “Do Pass Amendment #1.)

Then Obama voted against the identical version. (DPA means, “Do Pass as Amended.)

Additional corroboration of Obama’s vote: IL State Senate Republican Staff Analysis of SB 1082, March 12-13, 2003, bottom of page 2

For 4 years following his 2003 vote Obama misrepresented it, stating the wording of the IL version of Born Alive was not the same as the federal version, and he would have voted for it if so. As recently as August 16, 2008, Obama made this false assertion.

But when evidence presented was irrefutable, Obama’s campaign on August 18, 2008, admitted the truth to the New York Sun.

The nonpartisan group FactCheck.org has since corroborated Obama voted against identical legislation as passed overwhelmingly on the federal level and then misrepresented his vote.

Obama has repeatedly lied about it. See here and here.

And what was the justification for letting those children die?

Logistics.

“That if that fetus, or child, however you want to describe it, is now outside of the mother’s womb and the doctor continues to think that it’s non viable but there’s lets say movement or some indication that they’re not just coming out limp and dead that in fact they would then have to call in a second physician to monitor and check off and make sure that this is not a live child that could be saved?”

Oh, bother.

Kermit Gosnell, who has to be a Planned Parenthood hero, is accused of making sure abortion-surviving children died- by cutting their spines with scissors.

Obama “weeps” for the children of Newtown but is completely unmoved by the deaths of the abortion survivor babies.

$500 million of your tax dollars go to an organization that espouses infanticide.

Liberals don’t mind children dying. They just want them killed with something other than assault rifles. Handguns, shotguns, curettes and forceps are all acceptable. In Barack Obama’s case, neglect will do.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Exit mobile version