Site icon Flopping Aces

Economics for Politicians Chapter Six: – You are Greedy – This is a Bad Thing [Reader Post]

In Chapter Five we discussed how, because of its direct and indirect benefits to society corporate greed is not necessarily a bad thing. Now we’re going to look at a form of greed that is always bad, namely yours.

This lesson will actually be the lightest in terms of economic theory, but will probably be the most difficult for you to accept. Unfortunately for you, this lesson will show that many of your actions end up doing more harm than good.

It was either after the 2006 or 2008 elections (I can’t recall which) that House Majority Speaker Nancy Pelosi addressed her incoming Freshman class and advised them something to the effect of, “You’re number one priority is to get re-elected.” Her reason for this makes sense from a beltway perspective – in order to push grand changes your party needs to gain and hold power. Obamacare and how it was passed is a perfect example of this. Government takeover of the health care industry has been a holy grail for leftists for some time (Apparently the rest of us are too unenlightened to want to emulate systems that will bring 18 month standard waiting periods for surgery or turning family doctors into an endangered species ), and the majorities that the 2008 election provided were the perfect opportunity. After it was over leftists were angry (when are they not angry, anyway?) that it did not include the single payer option that they so dearly coveted. The Democratic leadership realized that they would face a slaughter in the midterm 2010 elections (for this among many other reasons), but recognized that if they pushed too hard too quickly there was a possibility of a veto-proof Republican majority being elected that would overturn the bill. So instead of including single payer immediately the bill was instead crafted to eventually strangle any private insurers under insane amounts of regulation to drive them out of business, leaving one insurer standing. That would be the government, and the house always wins.

That may have seemed like a lengthy tangent to an Economics lesson, but the entire picture was necessary to illustrate fundamental differences between business and government. Look at the timeline for where businesses have to think. Some take a short run view of cash flow an ensuring enough profitability to survive the next shareholder meeting, but any business leader who wants to keep his job or gain a promotion needs to be thinking farther down the road – years and possibly decades if the company is to grow and gain market share.

Your motivation is unfortunately far shorter term. While I understand Nancy Pelosi’s statement on priorities from a political perspective, as a taxpayer I find her remarks to be one of the most disgusting things to hear coming from the mouth of someone who works on a job that calls itself “public service”. This is why you put the good of your party over the good of your country and over the best interests of the local constituents that you represent.

Sadly, this is a social contract that we as voters have come to expect. So how does this affect us economically? Look at the impact of your greed versus that of a business. A business’ greed leads it to produce more of a product that is so vastly superior to all of the other choices on the market that people willingly choose to give up some of their hard earned income to buy it. You can read about the rest of the positive impacts of a business’ greed in Lesson Five.

Contrast this with the products of your greed. Donations from powerful teachers’ unions force you to trap inner-city minority children in failing schools. Money from defense contractors compels you to fund projects for military equipment that our forces may not want or need only because the contractor has operations in your district. I’m using two quick examples from both sides of the aisle to highlight the fundamental differences between you and business. The business’ money gets invested where it will be rewarded by producing the most of a good or service that society wants. You choose to allocate money based not on its economic benefit or societal good but rather on how effectively it can be used to get you re-elected.

I know that you’re going thinking that you do not think strictly short term. Development of military vehicles, building bridges, or destroying a health care system all take time to plan and execute. But ultimately the decisions for all of these go back to what will serve best to get you re-elected. This is also why you are so ready to not speak honestly to voters about issues and prefer to give them the pandering that will excite them into voting for you. If you are truly motivated by long term then why haven’t you done the following:

For that matter, if your thinking were truly long term, how did those permanent majorities that the Republicans achieved in 2004 and the Democrats’ in 2008 work out? This can not be an easy lesson for you to hear, so we’ll stop here as you (hopefully) follow the sage like advice of Obi-Wan Kenobi and go home and rethink your life. The next chapter will only be slightly less painful as I elaborate on how…

Lesson Seven: You Don’t “Invest”, You Spend

Previous Lessons:

Lesson One: It’s Not Your Money

Lesson Two: Intro to Microeconomics, or Why Prices Matter

Lesson Three: Intro to Macroeconomics. or So that’s Where Government Fits In!

Lesson Four: You Don’t Create Jobs – It’s Time to Get Over FDR!

Lesson Five: Businesses are Greedy – That’s Not Necessarily a Bad Thing!

* The role of the US in global security is probably the the most complicated out of these topics. I wrote about it a little bit here, and this subject will warrant its own post outside of this series

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Exit mobile version